Cited by 202Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age-related decline of sleep-dependent consolidation

Open access

Abstract

Sleep-dependent memory consolidation is observed following motor skill learning: Performance improvements are greater over a 12-h period containing sleep relative to an equivalent interval without sleep. Here we examined whether older adults exhibit sleep-dependent consolidation on a sequence learning task. Participants were trained on one of two sequence learning tasks. Performance was assessed after a 12-h break that included sleep and after a 12-h break that did not include sleep. Older and younger adults showed similar degrees of initial learning. However, performance of the older adults did not improve following sleep, providing evidence that sleep-dependent consolidation is diminished with age.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.569407

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.350 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–202 of 202

Metadata

Authors
Spencer, R. M. C., Gouw, A. M., & Ivry, R. B.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2007-07
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
480-484
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2146233078
Cited by
201
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32NS048012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
sleep-dependent memory consolidation, aging, older adults, sequence learning, motor skill learning, age-related decline, sleep deprivation, learning performance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review