Cited by 554Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage

Chun, Marvin M., Phelps, Elizabeth A.·1999·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The role of the hippocampus and adjacent medial temporal lobe structures in memory systems has long been debated. Here we show in humans that these neural structures are important for encoding implicit contextual information from the environment. We used a contextual cuing task in which repeated visual context facilitates visual search for embedded target objects. An important feature of our task is that memory traces for contextual information were not accessible to conscious awareness, and hence could be classified as implicit. Amnesic patients with medial temporal system damage showed normal implicit perceptual/skill learning but were impaired on implicit contextual learning. Our results demonstrate that the human medial temporal memory system is important for learning contextual information, which requires the binding of multiple cues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/12222

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training procedural skills is not entirely detached from declarative memory mechanisms, especially at an initial stage of training.

    “However, training such skills does not proceed entirely detached from declarative memory mechanisms, especially at an initial stage of training (e.g., Refs. 198, 533, 1013Refs. 198, 533, , 1014Refs. 198, 533, , 1042)).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [198]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chun, M. M., & Phelps, E. A.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Chun, Marvin M.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
1999-09
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
844-847
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2105173605
Cited by
554
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 34
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29mh050812-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH50812)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
hippocampus, amnesia, medial temporal lobe, implicit memory, contextual learning, contextual cuing, visual search, memory impairment, perceptual learning, skill acquisition, conscious awareness
MeSH terms
Adult, Amnesia, Hypoxia, Discrimination, Psychological, Encephalitis, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reference Values, Space Perception, Temporal Lobe, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review