Cited by 248Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesStress Responses and Cortisol

Stress administered prior to encoding impairs neutral but enhances emotional long-term episodic memories.

Open access
Payne, Jessica D., Jackson, Eric D., Hoscheidt, Siobhan, Ryan, Lee, Jacobs, W. Jake, Nadel, Lynn·2007·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Stressful events frequently comprise both neutral and emotionally arousing information, yet the impact of stress on emotional and neutral events is still not fully understood. The hippocampus and frontal cortex have dense concentrations of receptors for stress hormones, such as cortisol, which at high levels can impair performance on hippocampally dependent memory tasks. Yet, the same stress hormones can facilitate memory for emotional information, which involves interactions between the hippocampus and amygdala. Here, we induced psychosocial stress prior to encoding and examined its long-term effects on memory for emotional and neutral episodes. The stress manipulation disrupted long-term memory for a neutral episode, but facilitated long-term memory for an equivalent emotional episode compared with a control condition. The stress manipulation also increased salivary cortisol, catecholamines as indicated by the presence of α-amylase, heart rate, and subjectively reported stress. Stressed subjects reported more false memories than nonstressed control subjects, and these false memories correlated positively with cortisol levels, providing evidence for a relationship between stress and false memory formation. Our results demonstrate that stress, when administered prior to encoding, produces different patterns of long-term remembering for neutral and emotional episodes. These differences likely emerge from differential actions of stress hormones on memory-relevant regions of the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.743507

Cites

Statistics

25 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Claims the paper makes

0 of 53 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    No sex differences appeared in the memory analyses.

    “sex differences did not emerge in any of the memory analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    No significant correlations emerged between the memory measures and alpha-amylase or heart rate.

    “Significant correlations did not emerge between the memory measures and ␣-amylase or heart rate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Salivary cortisol was positively correlated with false memory recall.

    “Positive correlation between salivary cortisol and false memory recall.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The study found no sex differences in the memory analyses.

    “The second unanticipated finding concerns the lack of sex differences in the memory analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Interpretationcitation

    Plastic changes may be responsible for the lasting memory deficits often seen after stress before training.

    “These results suggest that specific plastic changes might underlie the long-term memory impairments frequently observed following pre-training stress exposure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • May combine two claims. 38
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 4
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Females reported higher self-reported anxiety than males during and after the stressor.

    “females reported significantly higher levels of self-reported anxiety than males during and after the stressor (t(74) = 2.4, P <0.02; t(74) = 2.1, P <0.05).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Exposure to the stressor increased self-reported anxiety immediately after and during the stressor, but stressed and control participants did not differ at baseline or the return visit.

    “exposure to the stressor elevated self-reported anxiety levels immediately after (t(74) = 8.2, P <0.0001), and during (i.e., “how did you feel during the stressor”) (t(74) = 14.0,P <0.0001) the stressor.”
    • Also stated in: § Subjective stress · plain
      “Stressed subjects did not differ from controls, however, at baseline or the return visit (t(74) = 0.37, P = 0.71; t(74) = 0.48, P = 0.63).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Stressed participants falsely reported more neutral slides than controls, while the groups did not differ in falsely reported emotional slides.

    “Follow-up t-tests revealed significantly more falsely reported neutral slides in the stress group than in the control group (t(36) = 4.7, P <0.05).”
    • Also stated in: § False memory · plain
      “There was no difference between groups for falsely reported emotional slides (P = 0.21).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In cued recall, stress increased recall of slides from the emotional story relative to controls, while the decrease in recall of neutral story slides in the stress group was only a trend.

    “stressed subjects recalled more of the slides from the emotional story a week later (58%), but fewer of the slides from the neutral story (36%), compared with the control group (44% and 42%, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    False memories correlated positively with cortisol levels overall, and this correlation was stronger among cortisol responders.

    “a positive correlation emerged between false memories and cortisol levels (r (76) = 0.23, P <0.05)-an effect which became even stronger when we analyzed cortisol responders separately (those secreting 12 nmoml/L or more in response to the TSST, [r (15) = 0.57, P <0.03, Fig. 5])”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In free recall, stress increased recall of the emotional story and decreased recall of the neutral story compared with controls.

    “while the controls showed similar recall of both stories”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One week after stress exposure, the emotional story was recalled better than the neutral story overall, and phase 2, which contained the emotional slides, was recalled better than phases 1 and 3.

    “demonstrating that 1 wk after stress exposure, the emotional story was better recalled than the neutral story overall, and that phase 2 (the phase containing the emotional slides) was better recalled than phases 1 and 3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the stress group, salivary alpha-amylase, an index of catecholamines, was higher after the TSST than before, while the control group showed lower levels at the second time point; baseline levels did not differ between groups.

    “participants in the stress group had significantly higher catecholamine levels following TSST exposure (Time 2) than they did before exposure (Time 1) (Ms = 94.9U/mL vs. 79.0U/mL; t(35) = 3.5, P = 0.003).”
    • Also stated in: § Catecholamines · plain
      “participants in the control group had significantly lower catecholamine levels at Time 2 than at Time 1 (Ms = 92.2U/mL vs. 81.6U/mL; t(39) = 2.6, P = 0.01)”
    • Also stated in: § Catecholamines · plain
      “the stress and control groups did not differ in their ␣amylase values at the Time 1 baseline (Ms = 79.0U/mL vs. 92.2U/mL, P = 0.17).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In recognition memory, stressed participants were impaired for the neutral slide show and enhanced for the emotional slide show relative to controls, who performed similarly on both stories.

    “stressed subjects' recognition memory was both significantly impaired for the neutral slide show (t(36) = 5.1, P <0.05) and significantly enhanced for the emotional slide show (t(36) = 4.5, P <0.05), relative to control subjects, who showed similar scores on both stories”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The TSST elevated heart rate relative to the control group during speech preparation, the speech task, and after the TSST.

    “exposure to the TSST significantly elevated heart rate over that of the control group (baseline: t(64) = 1.6, ns; speech preparation: t(64) = 4.8, P <0.001; speech task: t(64) = 7.8, P <0.001; post-TSST: t(64) = 3.6, P <0.001)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Trier Social Stress Test significantly raised salivary cortisol in the stress group compared with controls immediately after and 30 minutes after the stressor, with no group difference at baseline or the 1-week return.

    “stress exposure significantly elevated cortisol levels immediately after the stressor and 30-min after the stressor (t(74) = 3.2, P = 0.002; t(74) = 3.1, P = 0.003, respectively).”
    • Also stated in: § Cortisol levels · plain
      “The stress group did not differ from the control group, however, either at baseline or at the return visit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Stress administered before encoding enhanced long-term memory for emotional material and impaired long-term memory for neutral material relative to a no-stress control condition.

    “The stress manipulation disrupted long-term memory for a neutral episode, but facilitated long-term memory for an equivalent emotional episode compared with a control condition.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “Memory for emotionally arousing material was enhanced by the pre-training stress exposure, while memory for closely matched neutral material was impaired.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The emotional and neutral slide shows were equivalent except for emotional arousal.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Stressed participants falsely recalled more slides than controls, but only for the neutral story.

    “Stressed subjects falsely recalled more slides than control subjects, but only for the neutral story.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Stress before encoding enhances memory for an emotional event but disrupts memory for a carefully matched neutral event.

    “In summary, we have demonstrated that stress administered before encoding can enhance memory for an emotional event but disrupt memory for a carefully matched neutral event.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The study found that stress improved recognition of the emotional story and worsened recognition of the neutral story compared with control.

    “Stress resulted in better recognition of the emotional story, but poorer recognition of the neutral story, compared with the control condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The study found that stress increased recall of emotional story elements and decreased recall of neutral story elements compared with control.

    “Stress resulted in recall of more elements from the emotional story, but fewer elements from the neutral story, compared with the control condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The study found no overall advantage for emotional over neutral stories in memory; the emotional enhancement appeared only in the stress group relative to controls.

    “The first is the fact that we did not obtain generally better memory for emotional stories than the neutral ones (the effect only emerged in the stress relative to control group).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Glucocorticoids encourage a consolidation mode accompanied by impaired retrieval.

    “As Roozendaal (2002) has suggested, GCs encourage a consolidation mode that is accompanied by impaired retrieval.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roozendaal (2002)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    When stress is given before retrieval, memory is usually impaired irrespective of whether the material is emotional.

    “Stress administered before retrieval generally produces memory impairment, regardless of stimulus emotionality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kuhlmann et al. (2005a,b)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Amygdala-hippocampus interactions strengthen encoding and consolidation of emotionally arousing material.

    “Considerable research has shown that interactions between the amygdala and hippocampus enhance encoding and consolidation of emotionally arousing information (Cahill 2000;Canli et al. 2000;Packard and Cahill 2001;Phelps 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cahill 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Canli et al. 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Packard and Cahill 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although high cortisol reduces hippocampal function, the hippocampus in interaction with the amygdala appears capable of processing and storing emotional memories.

    “Thus, although hippocampal function is reduced by high cortisol levels (de Quervain et al. 2003), the hippocampus nonetheless, in its interactions with the amygdala, appears capable of processing and storing emotional memories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites de Quervain et al. 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By this model, emotional or stressful experiences briefly intensify hippocampal processing enough to capture the essence of an unfolding emotional episode, after which hippocampal processing is impaired.

    “By this model, emotional and/or stressful experiences briefly intensify hippocampal processing, and this is enough time to capture the essence of an unfolding emotional episode.Shortly thereafter, however, hippocampal processing is impaired”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Diamond et al. (2007) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cortisol elevations lead to changes in hippocampal structure and function and to pronounced memory deficits.

    “Cortisol elevations lead to demonstrable changes in hippocampal structure and function, and to pronounced memory deficits (e.g., for review, see Lupien and McEwen 1997;de Quervain et al. 2000;McEwen 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lupien and McEwen 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites de Quervain et al. 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McEwen 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Stress's short-lived activation of the hippocampus could account for the persistence of some neutral information in memory.

    “Interestingly, the brief activating effect of stress on hippocampal function may also explain why some neutral content remains in memory”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Hormones may promote storage only of memory elements that are themselves emotionally salient.

    “Via these interactions, hormone release might encourage encoding and consolidation of only those memory elements that were themselves emotionally arousing and salient (Abercrombie et al. 2006;Roozendaal et al. 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Abercrombie et al. 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Roozendaal et al. 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In rats, predator stress before training or before retrieval disrupted spatial memory; pretraining stress also reduced hippocampal spinogenesis, while pre-retrieval stress did not.

    “One recent study demonstrated that predator stress disrupted spatial memory in two groups of rats, one exposed to the stressor before training and another before memory retrieval (Diamond et al. 2006).”
    • Also stated in: § Potential mechanisms underlying stress-based neutral memory impairment · plain
      “Pretraining stress led not only to a pronounced impairment in spatial memory, but also to a reduction in hippocampal spinogenesis.”
    • Also stated in: § Potential mechanisms underlying stress-based neutral memory impairment · plain
      “Pre-retrieval stress, on the other hand, led to a similar disruption of memory, but had no effect on spinogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Diamond et al. 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The basolateral amygdala may have been preferentially activated by the emotional slide show, allowing glucocorticoids to enhance memory for emotional content but not neutral content.

    “These findings suggest that the BLA may have been preferentially activated by our emotionally arousing slide show, thus enabling GCs to enhance memory for emotional content, but not by the neutral slide show”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The stress-related enhancement of emotional memory and impairment of neutral memory likely arose from stress hormones acting on different memory systems.

    “Both the stress-based enhance-ment of emotional memory and the stress-based disruption of neutral memory likely arose from the impact of stress hormones on different memory systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The temporal dynamics model proposes that stress briefly enhances hippocampal activity for seconds to minutes, followed by a long refractory period of dramatically reduced hippocampal function.

    “The other possibility, as specified by Diamond et al. (2007), is based on a temporal dynamics model by which hippocampal activity is briefly enhanced by stress (on the order of seconds to minutes), followed by a long refractory period during which hippocampal function is dramatically reduced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Diamond et al. (2007) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cortisol elevations can disrupt the hippocampus and parts of the prefrontal cortex, which are required for normal memory, and can result in disruptions in memory for neutral information.

    “cortisol elevations can disrupt the functioning of the hippocampus and parts of the prefrontal cortex, which are required for normal memory function, and can result in disruptions in memory for neutral information (Kirschbaum et al. 1996;Kim and Diamond 2002;Jelicic et al. 2004;Payne et al. 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kirschbaum et al. 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kim and Diamond 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jelicic et al. 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Numerous studies suggest that amygdala activation underlies stress-based emotional memory enhancement, whereas hippocampal inactivation underlies stress-based neutral memory impairment.

    “Numerous studies suggest that amygdala activation underlies stressed-based emotional memory enhancement, whereas hippocampal inactivation underlies stress-based neutral memory impairment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The amygdala and hippocampus interact during retrieval of emotional memories.

    “Interestingly, the hippocampus and amygdala also play interactive roles in emotional memory retrieval (Dolcos et al. 2005;Kensinger and Schacter 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dolcos et al. 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kensinger and Schacter 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    For some conditions, stress before retrieval harms negative arousing material more than neutral material.

    “Indeed, Kuhlmann et al. (2005a,b) have demonstrated that, under certain conditions, negative arousing material suffers more than neutral material.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kuhlmann et al. (2005a,b)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Assay accuracy and linearity for cortisol were 103% and 96%, respectively.

    “Method accuracy, determined by spike recovery, and linearity, determined by serial dilution were 103% and 96%, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The emotional memory enhancement effect is robust and was observed by the authors in a similar prior study.

    “This”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Payne et al. 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Assay accuracy and linearity for alpha-amylase were 101% and 96%, respectively.

    “Method accuracy, determined by spike recovery, and linearity, determined by serial dilution were 101% and 96%, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Neutral memory recall was reduced even though the stress group showed a bias toward more false recall.

    “At the same time, the impaired recall of neutral memories appears to occur despite a bias shift toward more false recall.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Stress administered before encoding can influence later remembering, and the effects are complex.

    “We add to these findings by demonstrating that stress administered prior to encoding can influence later remembering, and that these effects are quite complex.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Most studies of human stress and memory have focused on either retrieval impairment or consolidation enhancement.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Payne et al. (2006) found that a brief delay after stress can leave neutral memory impaired while emotional memory is preserved, which suggests encoding may contribute.

    “Payne et al. (2006) showed that stress can produce neutral memory impairment and emotional memory preservation after a brief delay, which suggests that encoding processes could support these findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Payne et al. (2006)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Free and cued recall responses were scored by two judges blind to experimental condition; free recall agreement exceeded 90%.

    “Two judges, blind to experimental condition, scored these data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In these pharmacological experiments, cortisol was manipulated before encoding but reached its highest levels after stimulus encoding was completed.

    “In these experiments, cortisol was manipulated prior to encoding, but reached its highest levels after stimulus encoding had been completed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Salivary cortisol provides an index of bioavailable free cortisol and is a more accurate measure of cortisol responsivity than plasma cortisol.

    “Cortisol was assessed via saliva, which provides an index of bioavailable free cortisol and is considered a more accurate measure of cortisol responsivity than plasma cortisol (Kudielka and Kirschbaum 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kudielka and Kirschbaum 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Kuhlmann and Wolf (2006) demonstrated enhanced recall of emotional pictures and reduced recall of neutral pictures when cortisol was administered before encoding, similar to the present findings.

    “Interestingly, Kuhlmann and Wolf (2006) demonstrated enhanced recall of emotional pictures and reduced recall of neutral pictures when cortisol was administered prior to encoding, which is very similar to the findings reported here.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kuhlmann and Wolf (2006)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several pharmacological studies suggest that the present results are more likely due to influences on consolidation.

    “several pharmacological studies suggest that our results are more likely due to influences on consolidation (Buchanan and Lovallo 2001;Abercrombie et al. 2003;Kuhlmann and Wolf 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Buchanan and Lovallo 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Abercrombie et al. 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kuhlmann and Wolf 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Stress-related increases in salivary alpha-amylase can be inhibited by adrenergic antagonists and stimulated by beta-adrenergic agonists.

    “Stressrelated increases in salivary ␣-amylase can be inhibited by adrenergic antagonists and can be stimulated by ␤-adrenergic agonists (Speirs et al. 1974;Gallacher and Petersen 1983).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Speirs et al. 1974

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gallacher and Petersen 1983

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The TSST combines social evaluative threat and uncontrollability, which together produce a large HPA response in humans.

    “The TSST combines social evaluative threat with stressor uncontrollability, which together produce a large HPA response in humans (Dickerson and Kemeny 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dickerson and Kemeny 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The authors' previous finding was that stress increases false memories.

    “These false reports were of special interest given our previous finding that stress increases false memories (Payne et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Payne et al. 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Trier Social Stress Test is a well-established method for inducing a significant HPA response in the laboratory.

    “The TSST is a well-established method used to induce a significant HPA response in laboratory settings (Kirschbaum et al. 1993(Kirschbaum et al. , 1996;;Kuhlmann et al. 2005b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kirschbaum et al. 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kirschbaum et al. 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kuhlmann et al. 2005b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Eleven participants did not return for the one-week follow-up, leaving 65 who completed the protocol.

    “Eleven subjects failed to return at the 1-wk follow up session, resulting in a total of 65 subjects who completed the entire protocol.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
49 of 49
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The emotional and neutral slide shows were equivalent except for emotional arousal.

    “The stress manipulation disrupted long-term memory for a neutral episode, but facilitated long-term memory for an equivalent emotional episode compared with a control condition.”
    “two visually identical slide shows, distinguished only by an emotionally arousing (vs.neutral) narrative.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most studies of human stress and memory have focused on either retrieval impairment or consolidation enhancement.

    “To date, most studies of human stress and memory have focused either on the impairing effect of stress on retrieval, or the (generally) enhancing effect of stress on consolidation.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behavioral and pharmacological studies in humans showed enhanced long-term memory consolidation for emotional stimuli after stress or glucocorticoid (GC) treatment directly before or after encoding, while impairing the consolidation of neutral material.

    “Behavioral and pharmacological studies in humans showed enhanced long-term memory consolidation for emotional stimuli after stress or glucocorticoid (GC) treatment directly before or after encoding, while impairing the consolidation of neutral material [56], [57], [58].”

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value: t(35) = 1.3, p = .14

    Minor

    The paper reports p = .14 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .202 (two-tailed). The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p = .14 · recomputed p = .202

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upt(35) = 1.3reported p = .14 · recomputed p = .202

    “t(35) = 1.3, p = .14”

  • Consistentt(74) = 3.2reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .002

    “t(74) = 3.2, p = .002”

  • Consistentt(74) = 3.1reported p = .003 · recomputed p = .003

    “t(74) = 3.1, p = .003”

  • Consistentt(35) = 3.5reported p = .003 · recomputed p = .001

    “t(35) = 3.5, p = .003”

    The paper states a correction for multiple tests

  • Consistentt(39) = 2.6reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .013

    “t(39) = 2.6, p = .01”

  • Consistentt(74) = 8.2reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(74) = 8.2, p < .0001”

  • Consistentt(74) = 14reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(74) = 14.0,p < .0001”

  • Consistentt(74) = 0.37reported p = .71 · recomputed p = .712

    “t(74) = 0.37, p = .71”

  • Consistentt(74) = 0.48reported p = .63 · recomputed p = .633

    “t(74) = 0.48, p = .63”

  • Consistentt(74) = 2.4reported p < .02 · recomputed p = .019

    “t(74) = 2.4, p < .02”

  • Consistentt(74) = 2.1reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .039

    “t(74) = 2.1, p < .05”

  • Consistentt(64) = 1.6reported n.s. · recomputed p = .115

    “t(64) = 1.6, ns”

  • Consistentt(64) = 4.8reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(64) = 4.8, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(64) = 7.8reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(64) = 7.8, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(64) = 3.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(64) = 3.6, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(37) = 2.1reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .043

    “t(37) = 2.1, p < .05”

  • Consistentt(35) = 2reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .053

    “t(35) = 2.0, p < .05”

  • ConsistentF(1, 68) = 8.2reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .006

    “F (1,68) = 8.2, p < .01”

  • Consistentt(37) = 2.4reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .022

    “t(37) = 2.4, p = .02”

  • Consistentt(36) = 5.1reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(36) = 5.1, p < .05”

  • Consistentt(36) = 4.5reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(36) = 4.5, p < .05”

  • ConsistentF(1, 68) = 4reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .049

    “F (1,68) = 4.0, p < .05”

  • Consistentt(36) = 4.7reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(36) = 4.7, p < .05”

  • Consistentr(76) = 0.23reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .043

    “r (76) = 0.23, p < .05”

  • Consistentr(15) = 0.57reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .017

    “r (15) = 0.57, p < .03”

25 of 25

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Memory analysis implies more participants than completed the study

    Major

    The eight-cell memory ANOVA reports 68 residual degrees of freedom, implying 76 participants. The methods state that only 65 returned for the memory test.

  • Return-visit comparison uses the original sample size

    Minor

    The return-visit t-test has 74 degrees of freedom, implying 76 participants in an independent-groups comparison. Only 65 participants reportedly returned.

  • Control-group amylase values conflict across time-point descriptions

    Minor

    The comparison lists 92.2 before 81.6 while describing Time 2 as lower than Time 1. The subsequent baseline comparison identifies 92.2 as the control group's Time 1 value, indicating that the earlier pair is in the opposite order.

  • Heart-rate time effect has the wrong numerator degrees of freedom

    Minor

    The heart-rate model specifies four assessment times, for which an omnibus time effect has three numerator degrees of freedom. The reported main effect instead has one, although the time-by-group interaction has three.

4 of 4

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 248

Authors
Payne, J. D., Jackson, E. D., Hoscheidt, S., Ryan, L., Jacobs, W. J., & Nadel, L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2007-12
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
861-868
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2080743035
Cited by
248
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
psychosocial stress, emotional memory, episodic memory, memory encoding, cortisol, salivary cortisol, alpha-amylase, catecholamines, false memory, hippocampus, amygdala, stress hormones, heart rate
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Catecholamines, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Hippocampus, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Mental Recall, Repression, Psychology, Stress, Psychological, Prefrontal Cortex, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review