Cited by 697Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Event-Related Activation in the Human Amygdala Associates with Later Memory for Individual Emotional Experience

Open access
Canli, Turhan, Zhao, Zuo, Brewer, James, Gabrieli, John D. E., Cahill, Larry·2000·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The role of the amygdala in enhancing declarative memory for emotional experiences has been investigated in a number of animal, patient, and brain imaging studies. Brain imaging studies, in particular, have found a correlation between amygdala activation during encoding and subsequent memory. Because of the design of these studies, it is unknown whether this correlation is based on individual differences between participants or within-subject variations in moment-to-moment amygdala activation related to individual stimuli. In this study, participants saw neutral and negative scenes and indicated how emotionally intense they found each scene. Separate functional magnetic resonance imaging responses in the amygdala for each scene were related to the participants' report of their experience at study and to performance in an unexpected memory test 3 weeks after scanning. The amygdala had the greatest response to scenes rated as most emotionally intense. The degree of activity in the left amygdala during encoding was predictive of subsequent memory only for scenes rated as most emotionally intense. These findings support the view that amygdala activation reflects moment-to-moment subjective emotional experience and that this activation enhances memory in relation to the emotional intensity of an experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.20-19-j0004.2000

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amygdala responses track affective intensity, especially for aversive stimuli like those photos used widely in reappraisal studies.

    “Furthermore, prior work shows that amygdala responses track affective intensity, especially for aversive stimuli like those photos used widely in reappraisal studies (Canli et al. 2000;Williams et al. 2001;Anderson et al. 2003;Cunningham et al. 2004;Ochsner et al. 2004Ochsner et al. , 2009;;Phan et al. 2004).”

    From Cognitive Reappraisal of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Human Neuroimaging Studies (2014) · cites this paper as Canli et al. 2000

    The Results report that bilateral amygdala activation correlated with participants’ ratings of emotional intensity, and the Methods describe the stimuli as negative-to-neutral pictures. The Discussion says the study could not separate arousal from negative valence; it therefore does not establish that responses track intensity especially for aversive stimuli. The paper also does not establish how widely these photos are used in reappraisal studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Amygdala response to emotionally intense negative scenes is predictive of subsequent recall.

    “Canli et al. (2000) reported that amygdala response to emotionally intense negative scenes was predictive of subsequent recall.”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Canli et al. (2000)

  • Amygdala-hippocampus interactions strengthen encoding and consolidation of emotionally arousing material.

    “Considerable research has shown that interactions between the amygdala and hippocampus enhance encoding and consolidation of emotionally arousing information (Cahill 2000;Canli et al. 2000;Packard and Cahill 2001;Phelps 2004).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]21. Shields SA (1991) Gender in the psychology of emotion: a selective research review. In: International review of studies on emotion (Strong- man KT, ed), pp 227-245. New York: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canli, T., Zhao, Z., Brewer, J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Cahill, L.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2000-10-01
Volume
20
Issue
19
Pages
RC99-RC99
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2140577010
Cited by
697
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 35
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
amygdala, emotional memory, memory encoding, emotional intensity, subjective emotional experience, individual differences, declarative memory, scene perception, memory enhancement
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Psychological Tests, Repression, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review