Cited by 68Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A role for prefrontal calcium-sensitive protein phosphatase and kinase activities in working memory

Runyan, Jason D., Moore, Anthony N., Dash, Pramod K.·2005·Learning & Memory

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex is involved in the integration and interpretation of information for directing thoughts and planning action. Working memory is defined as the active maintenance of information in mind and is thought to lie at the core of many prefrontal functions. Although dopamine and other neurotransmitters have been implicated, the intracellular events activated by their receptors that influence working memory are poorly understood. We demonstrate that working memory involves transient changes in prefrontal G q/11-signaling and in calcium-dependent intracellular protein phosphatase and kinase activity. Interestingly, inhibition of the calcium activated phosphatase calcineurin impaired, while calcium/calmodulin dependent kinase II (CaMKII) and calcium-dependent protein kinase C (PKC) enhanced, working memory. Our findings suggest that the active maintenance of information required for working memory involves transient changes in the balance of these enzymes' activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.89405

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rodents, working memory deficits caused by pharmacological stress, cold water stress or administration of α1-agonists can be reversed by infusing PKC inhibitors directly into the prefrontal cortex.

    “In rodents the working memory deficits that are caused by pharmacological stress, cold water stress or administration of α1-agonists can be reversed by infusing PKC inhibitors directly into the PFC61,88.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Runyan, J. D., Moore, A. N., & Dash, P. K.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2005-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
103-110
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2063709171
Cited by
68
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 35457, R01NS035457)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
working memory, prefrontal cortex, calcineurin, CaMKII, protein kinase C, calcium signaling, Gq/11 signaling, protein phosphatase, protein kinases, information maintenance
MeSH terms
Animals, Discrimination Learning, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Phosphoprotein Phosphatases, Protein Kinases, Time Perception, Signal Transduction, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinases, Calcium Signaling, GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11, Rats, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review