Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thermal Conductivity, Electrical Resistivity, and Seebeck Coefficient of Silicon from 100 to 1300°K

Fulkerson, W., Moore, J. P., Williams, R. K., Graves, R. S., McElroy, D. L.·1968·Physical Review

Abstract

Results are presented of measurements of the thermal conductivity (90-1328\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K), the electrical resistivity (300-1273\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K), and the Seebeck coefficient (350-1273\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K) for single-crystal and large-grained polycrystalline specimens of 99.99+% pure silicon. The thermal conductivity above 387\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K was measured by an absolute radial-heat-flow technique; below 350\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K, by an absolute longitudinal technique. Some intermediate thermal-conductivity measurements from 300-400\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K were made on the polycrystalline material using a comparative longitudinal-heat-flow apparatus. The estimated errors of these three thermal-conductivity methods were \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2%\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K, \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.2%\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.1\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K, and \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}4.0%\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K, respectively. The estimated error for the electrical-resistivity measurements was \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.4%\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K, and for the Seebeck measurements \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.6%\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K. The thermal-conductivity values were compared with conflicting data from the literature, and they corroborate the higher-temperature results obtained by Glassbrenner and Slack. Therefore, we agree with their conclusion that the electronic contribution is reasonably close to theoretical estimates which include a large ambipolar-diffusion term. The temperature dependence of the lattice thermal resistance has been compared to various theoretical models but no approach seems to explain the data in detail. An abrupt slope change in the thermal resistivity at about 670\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K is a major cause of the difficulty.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.167.765

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Fulkerson, W., Moore, J. P., Williams, R. K., Graves, R. S., & McElroy, D. L.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1968-03-15
Volume
167
Issue
3
Pages
765-782
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052201268
Cited by
239
References
1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.