Cited by 1,652Thermal properties of materialsThermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and AlloysAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices

Thermal Conductivity of Silicon and Germanium from 3°K to the Melting Point

Glassbrenner, C. J., Slack, Glen A.·1964·Physical Review

Abstract

The thermal conductivity $K$ of single crystals of silicon has been measured from 3 to 1580\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K and of single crystals of germanium from 3 to 1190\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K. These measurements have been made using a steady-state, radial heat flow apparatus for $T>300\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}$K and a steady-state, longitudinal flow apparatus for $T<300\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}$K to give absolute $K$ values. This radial flow technique eliminates thermal radiation losses at high temperatures. The accuracy of both the low-temperature apparatus and the high-temperature apparatus is approximately \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}5%. Some special experimental techniques in using the high-temperature apparatus are briefly considered. At all temperatures the major contribution to $K$ in Si and Ge is produced by phonons. The phonon thermal conductivity has been calculated from a combination of the relaxation times for boundary, isotope, three-phonon, and four-phonon scattering, and was found to agree with the experimental measurements. Above 700\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K for Ge and 1000\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K for Si an electronic contribution to $K$ occurs, which agrees quite well with the theoretical estimates. At the respective melting points of Si and Ge, electrons and holes are responsible for 40% of the total $K$ and phonons are responsible for 60%. The measured electronic $K$ yields values for the thermal band gap at the melting point of 0.6\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.1 eV for Si and 0.26\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.08 eV for Ge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.134.a1058

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glassbrenner, C. J., & Slack, G. A.
Affiliations
General Electric (United States) (US)
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1964-05-18
Volume
134
Issue
4A
Pages
A1058-A1069
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036134495
Cited by
1,652
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 56
FWCI
11.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Keywords
thermal conductivity, silicon, germanium, lattice thermal conductivity, electronic thermal conductivity, phonon scattering, boundary scattering, isotope scattering, three-phonon scattering, four-phonon scattering, melting point, single crystals, low-temperature thermal conductivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review