The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Systems of Self-Gravitating Particles in General Relativity and the Concept of an Equation of State
Abstract
A method of self-consistent fields is used to study the equilibrium configurations of a system of self-gravitating scalar bosons or spin-\textonehalf{} fermions in the ground state without using the traditional perfect-fluid approximation or equation of state. The many-particle system is described by a second-quantized free field, which in the boson case satisfies the Klein-Gordon equation in general relativity, ${\ensuremath{\nabla}}_{\ensuremath{\alpha}}{\ensuremath{\nabla}}^{\ensuremath{\alpha}}\ensuremath{\varphi}={\ensuremath{\mu}}^{2}\ensuremath{\varphi}$, and in the fermion case the Dirac equation in general relativity ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{\ensuremath{\alpha}}{\ensuremath{\nabla}}_{\ensuremath{\alpha}}\ensuremath{\psi}=\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\psi}$ (where $\ensuremath{\mu}=\frac{\mathrm{mc}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}}$). The coefficients of the metric ${g}_{\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\beta}}$ are determined by the Einstein equations with a source term given by the mean value $〈\ensuremath{\varphi}|{T}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}|\ensuremath{\varphi}〉$ of the energy-momentum tensor operator constructed from the scalar or the spinor field. The state vector $〈\ensuremath{\varphi}|$ corresponds to the ground state of the system of many particles. In both cases, for completeness, a nonrelativistic Newtonian approximation is developed, and the corrections due to special and general relativity explicitly are pointed out. For $N$ bosons, both in the region of validity of the Newtonian treatment (density from ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}80}$ to ${10}^{54}$ g ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$, and number of particles from 10 to ${10}^{40}$) as well as in the relativistic region (density \ensuremath{\sim}${10}^{54}$ g ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$, number of particles \ensuremath{\sim}${10}^{40}$), we obtain results completely different from those of a traditional fluid analysis. The energy-momentum tensor is anisotropic. A critical mass is found for a system of $N\ensuremath{\sim}{[\frac{(\mathrm{Planck}\mathrm{mass})}{m}]}^{2}\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{40}$ (for $m\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}25}$ g) self-gravitating bosons in the ground state, above which mass gravitational collapse occurs. For $N$ fermions, the binding energy of typical particles is ${G}^{2}{m}^{5}{N}^{\frac{4}{3}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}}^{\ensuremath{-}2}$ and reaches a value $\ensuremath{\sim}{\mathrm{mc}}^{2}$ for $N\ensuremath{\sim}{N}_{\mathrm{crit}}\ensuremath{\sim}{[\frac{(\mathrm{Planck}\mathrm{mass})}{m}]}^{3}\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{57}$ (for $m\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}24}$ g, implying mass \ensuremath{\sim}${10}^{33}$ g, radius \ensuremath{\sim}${10}^{6}$ cm, density \ensuremath{\sim}${10}^{15}$ g/${\mathrm{cm}}^{3}$). For densities of this order of magnitude and greater, we have given the full self-consistent relativistic treatment. It shows that the concept of an equation of state makes sense only up to ${10}^{42}$ g/${\mathrm{cm}}^{3}$, and it confirms the Oppenheimer-Volkoff treatment in extremely good approximation. There exists a gravitational spin-orbit coupling, but its magnitude is generally negligible. The problem of an elementary scalar particle held together only by its gravitational field is meaningless in this context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time
Fulling, S. A. (1973) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2850 · Cited by 1,044
Asymptotically flat black holes with scalar hair: A review
Herdeiro, C. A. R., & Radu, E. (2015) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271815420146 · Cited by 729
Liebling, S. L., & Palenzuela, C. (2017) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0007-y · Cited by 371
Holdom, B., & Ren, J. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.084034 · Cited by 159
Boson stars driven to the brink of black hole formation
Hawley, S. H., & Choptuik, M. W. (2000) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.104024 · Cited by 129
An ultralight pseudoscalar boson
Kim, J. E., & Marsh, D. J. E. (2016) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.025027 · Cited by 76
Eby, J., & Takhistov, V. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.00100 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- RUFFINI, R., & BONAZZOLA, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1969-11-25
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1767-1783
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093340885
- Cited by
- 1,183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.