Cited by 1,811Electrical and Electromagnetic ResearchAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques

Thermal Agitation of Electricity in Conductors

Johnson, J. B.·1928·Physical Review

Abstract

Statistical fluctuation of electric charge exists in all conductors, producing random variation of potential between the ends of the conductor. The effect of these fluctuations has been measured by a vacuum tube amplifier and thermocouple, and can be expressed by the formula ${\overline{I}}^{2}=(\frac{2kT}{\ensuremath{\pi}})\ensuremath{\int}{0}^{\ensuremath{\infty}}R(\ensuremath{\omega}){|Y(\ensuremath{\omega})|}^{2}d\ensuremath{\omega}$. $I$ is the observed current in the thermocouple, $k$ is Boltzmann's gas constant, $T$ is the absolute temperature of the conductor, $R(\ensuremath{\omega})$ is the real component of impedance of the conductor, $Y(\ensuremath{\omega})$ is the transfer impedance of the amplifier, and $\frac{\ensuremath{\omega}}{2\ensuremath{\pi}}=f$ represents frequency. The value of Boltzmann's constant obtained from the measurements lie near the accepted value of this constant. The technical aspects of the disturbance are discussed. In an amplifier having a range of 5000 cycles and the input resistance $R$ the power equivalent of the effect is $\frac{{\overline{V}}^{2}}{R}=0.8\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}16}$ watt, with corresponding power for other ranges of frequency. The least contribution of tube noise is equivalent to that of a resistance ${R}_{c}=1.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\frac{{10}^{5}{i}_{p}}{\ensuremath{\mu}}$, where ${i}_{p}$ is the space current in milliamperes and $\ensuremath{\mu}$ is the effective amplificati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.32.97

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thermal noise is white noise and its spectral density does not depend on frequency up to 10^13 Hz.

    “Equation ( 3) and ( 4) demonstrate that the spectral density of thermal noise is also not depend on frequency and this is valid into 10 13 Hz.Thus, thermal noise is another white noise.”

    From True Random Number Generators Using Electrical Noise (2019) · cites this paper as [36]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, J. B.
Corresponding author
Johnson, J. B.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1928-07-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
97-109
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090888886
Cited by
1,811
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 45
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Electrical and Electromagnetic Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Keywords
thermal noise, electrical conductors, Boltzmann constant, thermocouple temperature measurement, vacuum tube amplifiers, transfer impedance, impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review