Cited by 120Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

Materials challenges for trapped-ion quantum computers

Open access
Brown, Kenneth R., Chiaverini, John, Sage, Jeremy M., Häffner, Hartmut·2021·Nature Reviews Materials

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41578-021-00292-1

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of radio-frequency fields in trapped-ion traps presents several challenges to scaling, including requiring compatibility of chips with high voltages, managing power dissipation, and restricting transport and placement of ions.

    “However, the use of radio-frequencies presents several challenges to scaling, including requiring compatibility of chips with high voltages4, managing power dissipation5 and restricting transport and placement of ions6.”

    From Penning micro-trap for quantum computing (2024) · cites this paper as [4]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [58]58. Stephenson, L. J. et al. High-Rate, High-Fidelity Entanglement of Qubits Across an Elementary Quantum Network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 110501 (2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, K. R., Chiaverini, J., Sage, J. M., & Häffner, H.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Kenneth R.
Venue
Nature Reviews Materials
Published
2021-03-25
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
892-905
ISSN
2058-8437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082744264
Cited by
120
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Materials (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1818914, FA8702-15-D-0001)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (FA8702-15-D-0001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
trapped-ion quantum computer, ion trap, electric field noise, surface science, integrated photonics, integrated electronics, noise mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review