Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatially resolving classical and quantum entanglement with structured photons

Peters, Cade, Ornelas, Pedro, Nape, Isaac, Forbes, Andrew·2023·Physical Review A

Abstract

Nonseparability in classical and quantum states of light gives rise to the notions of classical (local) and quantum (nonlocal) entanglement, usually defined as global features of the fields and states. Here we use concurrence as a measure of this nonseparability and show that it can be spatially resolved, revealing regions of maximum nonseparability and regions with no nonseparability. We use the topical examples of vectorial structured light and its quantum analog, a hybrid spatial mode and polarization entangled states, to test the approach on both local and nonlocal forms of entanglement. Our work has wide reaching implications, for instance, in understanding the spatial dependence of coherence and polarization in vectorial light, as well as in quantum entangled states for imaging, where spatial correlations are vital.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.108.053502

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using classical light, results on depolarization and decoherence are directly transferable to quantum skyrmions due to the close mathematical analogy between hybrid entangled biphoton states and classical vector beams.

    “Using classical light, we can easily probe the effects of depolarization and decoherence, with the results being directly transferable to quantum skyrmions due to the close mathematical analogy between hybrid entangled biphoton states and classical vector beams (60, 69, 70).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1038/s41566-021-00780-4 · DOI
  2. 10.1063/5.0138224 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/s42254-022-00467-x · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41377-022-00897-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1116/1.5112027 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1088/2040-8986/aaeb7d · DOI
  7. 10.1002/lpor.202100533 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1023/A:1018703709245 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/bs.po.2018.11.001 · DOI
  10. 10.1364/AOP.1.000001 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.1260635 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41566-022-01023-w · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1364/AOP.11.000067 · DOI
  14. 10.1364/OL.36.004110 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.153901 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s42254-020-0193-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nphys607 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.062308 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052325 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41567-018-0347-x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041042 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/s42254-019-0056-0 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.022313 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.06.003 · DOI
  27. 10.1088/1402-4896/ac44b5 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.210403 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/ncomms1988 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41567-018-0203-z · DOI
  31. 10.1038/s41467-019-10810-z · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.233601 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.010308 · DOI
  34. 10.22331/q-2020-12-24-376 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.023833 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.063842 · DOI
  37. 10.1088/2040-8986/ac5a7d · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peters, C., Ornelas, P., Nape, I., & Forbes, A.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2023-11-03
Volume
108
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
Cited by
13
References
2
Language
en
Funders
National Research Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review