The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Abstract
A state of a composite quantum system is called classically correlated if it can be approximated by convex combinations of product states, and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlated otherwise. Any classically correlated state can be modeled by a hidden-variable theory and hence satisfies all generalized Bell's inequalities. It is shown by an explicit example that the converse of this statement is false.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which implies the well known fact8 that a given Werner state is separable iff its mixing parameter is .”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“This function reduces for to the well-known result that the Werner state violates the CHSH inequality iff the mixing parameter 8.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“By comparing Eq. (26) with Eq. (8), it is clearly seen that the Werner states for the mixing parameter are entangled, although they do not violate the CHSH inequality, as was first predicted in Ref.8.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“In Ref. ͓21͔, by using a setup similar to the one shown in Fig. 1, we have experimentally generated entangled twoqubit mixed states that lie upon and below the Werner curve in the linear entropy-tangle plane ͓41͔.”
From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“For pure states, this entanglement can be efficiently concentrated into singlets by the methods of [6], which use local operations and classical communication to transform n input states Υ into m singlets with a yield m/n approaching E (Υ) as n → ∞ .”
From Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels (1996) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Conversely, given n shared singlets, local actions and classical communication suffice to prepare m arbitrarily good copies of Υ with a yield m/n approaching 1 /E (Υ) as n →∞ .”
From Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels (1996) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
Bell's theorem. Experimental tests and implications
Clauser, J. F., & Shimony, A. (1978) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/41/12/002 · Cited by 1,551
An algebraic approach to quantum field theory
Haag, R., & Kastler, D. (1964) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1704187 · Cited by 1,250
On the Foundations of Quantum Physics
Piron, C. (1976) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1440-3_7 · Cited by 554
Foundations of Quantum Mechanics I
Ludwig, G. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86751-4 · Cited by 440
Bell’s inequalities and quantum field theory. I. General setting
Summers, S. J., & Werner, R. F. (1987) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.527733 · Cited by 245
Self-citationFarkas's Lemma and the nature of reality: Statistical implications of quantum correlations
Garg, A., & Mermin, N. D. (1984) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00741645 · Cited by 71
Drieschner, M. (2002) · Brill | mentis eBooks · doi:10.30965/9783969757246 · Cited by 47
Correlation Inequalities and Hidden Variables
Garg, A., & Mermin, N. D. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1220 · Cited by 46
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- G. Wittstock, 1974, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics and Ordered Linear Spaces, Vol. 29 of Lecture Notes in Physics
- S. J. Summers, 1988, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, 49, 215
- A. M. Gleason, 1957, J. Ration. Mech. Anal., 6, 885
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,010
Collective tests for quantum nonlocality
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.2685 · Cited by 179
Sudden death of entanglement at finite temperature
Al-Qasimi, A., & James, D. F. V. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.012117 · Cited by 178
Simulating Positive-Operator-Valued Measures with Projective Measurements
Oszmaniec, M., Guerini, L., Wittek, P., & Acín, A. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.190501 · Cited by 175
Jones, J. A. (2001) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/s0079-6565(00)00033-9 · Cited by 177
Hu, M., & Fan, H. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032338 · Cited by 178
Local environment can enhance fidelity of quantum teleportation
Badziąg, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.012311 · Cited by 179
One-step error correction for multipartite polarization entanglement
Deng, F. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.062316 · Cited by 176
Quantum channels and their entropic characteristics
Holevo, A. S., & Giovannetti, V. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/4/046001 · Cited by 178
Reduction criterion for separability
Cerf, N. J., Adami, C., & Gingrich, R. M. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.60.898 · Cited by 173
Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC
Afik, Y., & de Nova, J. R. M. (2021) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01902-1 · Cited by 252
Negativity and steering: A stronger Peres conjecture
Pusey, M. F. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.032313 · Cited by 173
Landsman, N. P. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044451560-5/50008-7 · Cited by 204
Are General Quantum Correlations Monogamous?
Streltsov, A., Adesso, G., Piani, M., & Bruß, D. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.050503 · Cited by 164
Unified quantification of nonclassicality and entanglement
Vogel, W., & Sperling, J. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.052302 · Cited by 170
Measurement-Device-Independent Entanglement Witnesses for All Entangled Quantum States
Branciard, C., Rosset, D., Liang, Y.-C., & Gisin, N. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.060405 · Cited by 164
Unified view of quantum correlations and quantum coherence
Tan, K. C., Kwon, H., Park, C.-Y., & Jeong, H. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.022329 · Cited by 178
Direct measurement of finite-time disentanglement induced by a reservoir
Santos, M. F., Milman, P., Davidovich, L., & Zagury, N. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.040305 · Cited by 169
A Postquantum Theory of Classical Gravity?
Oppenheim, J. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041040 · Cited by 243
Standard model physics and the digital quantum revolution: thoughts about the interface
Klco, N., Roggero, A., & A, M. J. S. (2022) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac58a4 · Cited by 209
OPEN QUANTUM DYNAMICS: COMPLETE POSITIVITY AND ENTANGLEMENT
Benatti, F., & Roberto Floreanini, B. (2005) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979205032097 · Cited by 166
Disproving the Peres conjecture by showing Bell nonlocality from bound entanglement
Vértesi, T., & Brunner, N. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6297 · Cited by 170
Multipartite Entanglement Witnesses
Sperling, J., & Vogel, W. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.110503 · Cited by 163
Noh, K., Albert, V. V., & Jiang, L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2018.2873764 · Cited by 152
Quantifying entanglement in macroscopic systems
Vedral, V. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07124 · Cited by 156
Designing a quantum network protocol
Kozlowski, W., Dahlberg, A., & Wehner, S. (2020) · ACM International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT) · doi:10.1145/3386367.3431293 · Cited by 178
Separability in 2×N composite quantum systems
Kraus, B., Cirac, J. I., Karnas, S., & Lewenstein, M. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.062302 · Cited by 154
Entanglement and Permutational Symmetry
Tóth, G., & Gühne, O. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.170503 · Cited by 157
Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum Fisher information
Tóth, G., & Petz, D. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.032324 · Cited by 157
Experimental Machine Learning of Quantum States
Gao, J., Qiao, L., Jiao, Z., Ma, Y., Hu, C.-Q., Ren, R.-J., Yang, A.-L., Tang, H. L., Yung, M., & Jin, X. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.240501 · Cited by 153
Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics?
Laloë, F. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108569361 · Cited by 171
Converse Bounds for Private Communication Over Quantum Channels
Wilde, M. M., Tomamichel, M., & Berta, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2017.2648825 · Cited by 162
Environment-Induced Sudden Transition in Quantum Discord Dynamics
Auccaise, R., Céleri, L. C., Soares-Pinto, D. O., DeAzevedo, E. R., Maziero, J., Souza, A. M., Bonagamba, T. J., Sarthour, R. S., Oliveira, I. S., & Serra, R. M. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.140403 · Cited by 155
Optimal entanglement witnesses for continuous-variable systems
Hyllus, P., & Eisert, J. (2006) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/8/4/051 · Cited by 154
Generalizations of entanglement based on coherent states and convex sets
Barnum, H., Knill, E. H., Ortíz, G., & Viola, L. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.032308 · Cited by 158
Geometric picture of entanglement and Bell inequalities
Bertlmann, R. A., Narnhofer, H., & Thirring, W. E. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.032319 · Cited by 160
On Duality between Quantum Maps and Quantum States
Życzkowski, K., & Bengtsson, I. (2004) · Open Systems & Information Dynamics · doi:10.1023/b:opsy.0000024753.05661.c2 · Cited by 160
Entanglement in fermionic systems
Bañuls, M. C., Cirac, J. I., & Wolf, M. M. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.022311 · Cited by 143
Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Timpson, C. G. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296460.001.0001 · Cited by 152
Operational criterion and constructive checks for the separability of low-rank density matrices
Horodecki, P., Lewenstein, M., Vidal, G., & Cirac, J. I. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.032310 · Cited by 151
Entanglement of Formation of Bipartite Quantum States
Chen, K., Albeverio, S. A., & Fei, S.-M. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210501 · Cited by 147
Quantum versus classical uncertainty
Luo, S. (2005) · Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s11232-005-0098-6 · Cited by 149
16-qubit IBM universal quantum computer can be fully entangled
Wang, Y., Li, Y., Yin, Z.-Q., & Zeng, B. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0095-x · Cited by 148
Geometry of Bloch vectors in two-qubit system
Jakóbczyk, L., & Siennicki, M. (2001) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(01)00455-8 · Cited by 148
General Paradigm for Distilling Classical Key From Quantum States
Horodecki, K., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Oppenheim, J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2008.2009798 · Cited by 148
Shor, P. W., Smolin, J. A., & Terhal, B. M. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.2681 · Cited by 149
Large Violation of Bell Inequalities with Low Entanglement
Junge, M., & Palazuelos, C. (2011) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-011-1296-8 · Cited by 136
Terhal, B. M. (2003) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 166
Quantum entanglement and Bell inequalities in Heisenberg spin chains
Wang, X., & Paolo Zanardi, A. (2002) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 145
Superactivation of Quantum Nonlocality
Palazuelos, C. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.190401 · Cited by 156
Genuine Hidden Quantum Nonlocality
Hirsch, F., Quintino, M. T., Bowles, J., & Brunner, N. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.160402 · Cited by 146
Teleportation via thermally entangled states of a two-qubit HeisenbergXXchain
Yeo, Y. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.062312 · Cited by 144
The Mathematical Language of Quantum Theory: From Uncertainty to Entanglement
Heinosaari, T., & Ziman, M. (2012) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 168
More efficient Bell inequalities for Werner states
Vértesi, T. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.032112 · Cited by 144
Unbounded Violation of Tripartite Bell Inequalities
Pérez-Garcı́a, D., Wolf, M. M., Palazuelos, C., Villanueva, I., & Junge, M. (2008) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0418-4 · Cited by 135
Quantum Communication Complexity
Gilles Brassard, A. (2003) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1026009100467 · Cited by 146
Detection of multipartite entanglement in the vicinity of symmetric Dicke states
Tóth, G. (2007) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.24.000275 · Cited by 141
Martin, J., & Vennin, V. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.023505 · Cited by 139
Unified criteria for multipartite quantum nonlocality
Cavalcanti, E. G., He, Q., Reid, M. D., & Wiseman, H. M. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.032115 · Cited by 143
Causal and causally separable processes
Oreshkov, O., & Giarmatzi, C. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093020 · Cited by 186
Perseguers, S., Lewenstein, M., Acín, A., & Cirac, J. I. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1665 · Cited by 139
Separability of Mixed Quantum States: Linear Contractions and Permutation Criteria
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (2006) · Open Systems & Information Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11080-006-7271-8 · Cited by 139
Lectures on General Quantum Correlations and their Applications
Dhar, H. S., Pal, A. K., Rakshit, D., De, A. S., & Sen, U. (2017) · Quantum science and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53412-1 · Cited by 153
Jiang, M., Luo, S., & Fu, S. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.022310 · Cited by 137
All Bipartite Entangled States Display Some Hidden Nonlocality
Masanes, L., Liang, Y.-C., & Doherty, A. C. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.090403 · Cited by 138
Quantum extension of conditional probability
Cerf, N. J., & Adami, C. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.60.893 · Cited by 136
All Bipartite Entangled States Are Useful for Information Processing
Masanes, L. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.150501 · Cited by 136
Non-Markovian quantum dynamics: Correlated projection superoperators and Hilbert space averaging
Breuer, H.-P., Gemmer, J., & Michel, M. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.73.016139 · Cited by 134
Not all pure entangled states are useful for sub-shot-noise interferometry
Hyllus, P., Gühne, O., & Smerzi, A. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.012337 · Cited by 137
Toward a Photonic Demonstration of Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution
Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Zhen, Y.-Z., Li, M.-H., Liu, Y., Fan, J., Xu, F., Zhang, Q., & Pan, J.-W. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.050502 · Cited by 162
Entanglement can enhance the distinguishability of entanglement-breaking channels
Sacchi, M. F. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.014305 · Cited by 134
Classifying Directional Gaussian Entanglement, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering, and Discord
He, Q., Gong, Q., & Reid, M. D. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.060402 · Cited by 134
Negativity of quantumness and its interpretations
Nakano, T., Piani, M., & Adesso, G. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.012117 · Cited by 133
Li, Z., Xue, K., Li, J., Chen, L., Li, R., Wang, Z., Yu, N., Wei, D. S. L., Sun, Q., & Lu, J. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3294240 · Cited by 149
Noise Robustness of the Nonlocality of Entangled Quantum States
Almeida, M. L., Pironio, S., Barrett, J., Tóth, G., & Acín, A. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.040403 · Cited by 133
Approximate transformations and robust manipulation of bipartite pure-state entanglement
Vidal, G., Jonathan, D., & Nielsen, M. A. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.012304 · Cited by 139
Sufficient criterion for guaranteeing that a two-qubit state is unsteerable
Bowles, J., Hirsch, F., Quintino, M. T., & Brunner, N. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.022121 · Cited by 131
Disentanglement in a quantum-critical environment
Sun, Z., Wang, X., & Sun, C. P. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.062312 · Cited by 131
Li, Y., & Lin, H. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.052323 · Cited by 130
Hu, M., & Fan, H. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.022314 · Cited by 130
Separability properties of tripartite states with U ⊗ U ⊗ U symmetry
Eggeling, T., & Werner, R. F. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.63.042111 · Cited by 127
Self-citationQuantum networks reveal quantum nonlocality
Cavalcanti, D., Almeida, M. L., Scarani, V., & Acín, A. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1193 · Cited by 130
An Introduction to Entanglement Theory
Plenio, M. B., & Virmani, S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04063-9_8 · Cited by 126
The Structure of Bipartite Quantum States - Insights from Group Theory and CryptographyPreprint
Christandl, M. (2006) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0604183 · Cited by 188
Hyllus, P., Pezzè, L., & Smerzi, A. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.120501 · Cited by 130
On the quantification of entanglement in infinite-dimensional quantum systems
Eisert, J., Simon, C., & Plenio, M. B. (2002) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/17/307 · Cited by 125
Hierarchy of Steering Criteria Based on Moments for All Bipartite Quantum Systems
Kogias, I., Skrzypczyk, P., Cavalcanti, D., Acín, A., & Adesso, G. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.210401 · Cited by 128
Qubit Teleportation and Transfer across Antiferromagnetic Spin Chains
Venuti, L. C., Boschi, C. D. E., & Roncaglia, M. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.060401 · Cited by 127
Wu, S., Poulsen, U. V., & Mølmer, K. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.032319 · Cited by 127
Cerf, N. J., & Adami, C. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.3371 · Cited by 127
Teleportation Systems Toward a Quantum Internet
Valivarthi, R., Davis, S. I., Peña, C., Xie, S., Lauk, N., Narváez, L., Allmaras, J. P., Beyer, A. D., Gim, Y., Hussein, M., et al. (2020) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.1.020317 · Cited by 140
Lower bounds on concurrence and separability conditions
de Vicente, J. I. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.052320 · Cited by 120
Purifying Noisy Entanglement Requires Collective Measurements
Linden, N., Massar, S., & Popescu, S. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3279 · Cited by 121
Algebraic characterization ofX-states in quantum information
Rau, A. R. P. (2009) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/41/412002 · Cited by 124
Entanglement Distribution in a Quantum Network: A Multicommodity Flow-Based Approach
Chakraborty, K., Elkouss, D., Rijsman, B., & Wehner, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2020.3028172 · Cited by 135
Mixed-state sensitivity of several quantum-information benchmarks
Peters, N. A., Wei, T.-C., & Kwiat, P. G. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052309 · Cited by 126
Detecting multipartite entanglement
Doherty, A. C., Parrilo, P. A., & Spedalieri, F. M. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.032333 · Cited by 125
Entanglement in indistinguishable particle systems
Benatti, F., Roberto Floreanini, B., Franchini, F., & Marzolino, U. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.07.003 · Cited by 127
The Information-Disturbance Tradeoff and the Continuity of Stinespring's Representation
Kretschmann, D., Schlingemann, D., & Werner, R. F. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2008.917696 · Cited by 122
Self-citationBose, S., & Vedral, V. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.040101 · Cited by 122
Multipartite Bound Entangled States that Violate Bell’s Inequality
Dür, W. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.230402 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Werner, R. F.
- Affiliations
- Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Werner, Reinhard F.
- ORCID
- Werner, Reinhard F.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1989-10-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4277-4281
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062292260
- Cited by
- 4,062
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 124 · 2025: 199 · 2024: 200 · 2023: 225 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 189 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 188 · 2018: 166 · 2017: 169 · 2016: 205 · 2015: 163 · 2014: 160 · 2013: 181 · 2012: 190
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations, hidden variable models, generalized Bell inequalities, composite quantum systems, product states
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
