The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Abstract
A state of a composite quantum system is called classically correlated if it can be approximated by convex combinations of product states, and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlated otherwise. Any classically correlated state can be modeled by a hidden-variable theory and hence satisfies all generalized Bell's inequalities. It is shown by an explicit example that the converse of this statement is false.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which implies the well known fact8 that a given Werner state is separable iff its mixing parameter is .”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“This function reduces for to the well-known result that the Werner state violates the CHSH inequality iff the mixing parameter 8.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“By comparing Eq. (26) with Eq. (8), it is clearly seen that the Werner states for the mixing parameter are entangled, although they do not violate the CHSH inequality, as was first predicted in Ref.8.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“In Ref. ͓21͔, by using a setup similar to the one shown in Fig. 1, we have experimentally generated entangled twoqubit mixed states that lie upon and below the Werner curve in the linear entropy-tangle plane ͓41͔.”
From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“For pure states, this entanglement can be efficiently concentrated into singlets by the methods of [6], which use local operations and classical communication to transform n input states Υ into m singlets with a yield m/n approaching E (Υ) as n → ∞ .”
From Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels (1996) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Conversely, given n shared singlets, local actions and classical communication suffice to prepare m arbitrarily good copies of Υ with a yield m/n approaching 1 /E (Υ) as n →∞ .”
From Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels (1996) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
Bell's theorem. Experimental tests and implications
Clauser, J. F., & Shimony, A. (1978) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/41/12/002 · Cited by 1,551
An algebraic approach to quantum field theory
Haag, R., & Kastler, D. (1964) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1704187 · Cited by 1,250
On the Foundations of Quantum Physics
Piron, C. (1976) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1440-3_7 · Cited by 554
Foundations of Quantum Mechanics I
Ludwig, G. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86751-4 · Cited by 440
Bell’s inequalities and quantum field theory. I. General setting
Summers, S. J., & Werner, R. F. (1987) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.527733 · Cited by 245
Self-citationFarkas's Lemma and the nature of reality: Statistical implications of quantum correlations
Garg, A., & Mermin, N. D. (1984) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00741645 · Cited by 71
Drieschner, M. (2002) · Brill | mentis eBooks · doi:10.30965/9783969757246 · Cited by 47
Correlation Inequalities and Hidden Variables
Garg, A., & Mermin, N. D. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1220 · Cited by 46
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- G. Wittstock, 1974, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics and Ordered Linear Spaces, Vol. 29 of Lecture Notes in Physics
- S. J. Summers, 1988, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, 49, 215
- A. M. Gleason, 1957, J. Ration. Mech. Anal., 6, 885
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,010
Interpolation of recurrence and hashing entanglement distillation protocols
Vollbrecht, K. G. H., & Verstraete, F. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.062325 · Cited by 55
Quantum entanglement and the two-photon Stokes parameters
Abouraddy, A. F., Sergienko, A. V., Saleh, B. E. A., & Teich, M. C. (2002) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(01)01645-5 · Cited by 56
Quantifying quantum discord and entanglement of formation via unified purifications
Cen, L.-X., Li, X.-Q., Shao, J., & Yan, Y. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.054101 · Cited by 55
Quantifying Bell nonlocality with the trace distance
Brito, S., Amaral, B., & Chaves, R. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.022111 · Cited by 57
Separability and Fourier representations of density matrices
Pittenger, A. O., & Rubin, M. H. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.032313 · Cited by 57
Spin-resolved Andreev transport through double-quantum-dot Cooper pair splitters
Trocha, P., & Weymann, I. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.235424 · Cited by 54
Quantum entanglement and quantum discord in magnetoactive materials (Review Article)
Aldoshin, S. M., Fel’dman, E. B., & Yurishchev, M. A. (2014) · Low Temperature Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4862469 · Cited by 53
Two-setting Bell inequalities for graph states
Tóth, G., Gühne, O., & Briegel, H. J. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.022303 · Cited by 55
Consensus for Quantum Networks: Symmetry From Gossip Interactions
Mazzarella, L., Sarlette, A., & Ticozzi, F. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2336351 · Cited by 54
Information-Disturbance Tradeoff in Estimating a Maximally Entangled State
Sacchi, M. F. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.220502 · Cited by 53
Local aspects of disentanglement induced by spontaneous emission
Jamróz, A. (2006) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/24/009 · Cited by 52
Creation and protection of entanglement in systems out of thermal equilibrium
Bellomo, B., & Antezza, M. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113052 · Cited by 51
Entanglement without hidden nonlocality
Hirsch, F., Quintino, M. T., Bowles, J., Vértesi, T., & Brunner, N. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113019 · Cited by 59
Activation of Nonlocal Quantum Resources
Navascués, M., & Vértesi, T. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.060403 · Cited by 53
Positivity of linear maps under tensor powers
Müller‐Hermes, A., Reeb, D., & Wolf, M. M. (2015) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4927070 · Cited by 53
Piani, M., & Mora, C. E. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.012305 · Cited by 51
Generation and propagation of entanglement in driven coupled-qubit systems
Li, J., & Paraoanu, G. S. (2009) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/11/113020 · Cited by 53
Tomography is Necessary for Universal Entanglement Detection with Single-Copy Observables
Lu, D., Xin, T., Yu, N., Ji, Z., Chen, J., Long, G., Baugh, J., Peng, X., Zeng, B., & Laflamme, R. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.230501 · Cited by 53
Tripartite Entanglement: Foundations and Applications
Cunha, M. M., Fonseca, A., & Silva, E. O. (2019) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe5100209 · Cited by 59
Quantum state tomography with quantum shot noise
Samuelsson, P., & Büttiker, Μ. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.041305 · Cited by 56
Quantum Correlations and Secret Bits
Acín, A., & Gisin, N. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.020501 · Cited by 53
Purification of entangled coherent statesPreprint
Jeong, H., & Kim, M. S. (2002) · doi:10.5555/2011430.2011434 · Cited by 53
When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein debate
Landsman, N. P. (2005) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.10.002 · Cited by 58
Geometry of two-qubit states with negative conditional entropy
Friis, N., Bulusu, S., & Bertlmann, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa5dfd · Cited by 53
Feedback Control of Quantum Correlations in a Cavity Magnomechanical System with Magnon Squeezing
Amazioug, M., Singh, S. K., Teklu, B., & Asjad, M. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25101462 · Cited by 53
Separability Transitions in Topological States Induced by Local Decoherence
Chen, Y.-H., & Grover, T. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.170602 · Cited by 52
Four-qubit entangled symmetric states with positive partial transpositions
Tura, J., Augusiak, R., Hyllus, P., Kuś, M., Samsonowicz, J., & Lewenstein, M. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.060302 · Cited by 52
Two-qubit Bell inequality for which positive operator-valued measurements are relevant
Vértesi, T., & Bene, E. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.062115 · Cited by 52
Nourmandipour, A., Tavassoly, M. K., & Rafiee, M. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.022327 · Cited by 51
Entanglement cost and quantum channel simulation
Wilde, M. M. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.042338 · Cited by 53
Detecting two-party quantum correlations in quantum-key-distribution protocols
Curty, M., Gühne, O., Lewenstein, M., & Lütkenhaus, N. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.022306 · Cited by 52
Electrical current noise of a beamsplitter as a test of spin entanglement
Samuelsson, P., Sukhorukov, E. V., & Büttiker, Μ. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.115330 · Cited by 52
Entanglement thresholds for random induced statesPreprint
Aubrun, G., Law, S., Szarek, J., & Ye, D. (2014) · Cited by 58
Entanglement without hidden nonlocality
Hirsch, F., Quintino, M. T., Bowles, J., Vértesi, T., & Brunner, N. (2016) · Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) · Cited by 51
From Time-Reversal Symmetry to Quantum Bayes’ Rules
Parzygnat, A. J., & Fullwood, J. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020334 · Cited by 78
Computable Cross-norm Criterion for Separability
Rudolph, O. (2004) · Letters in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s11005-004-0767-7 · Cited by 52
Test for entanglement using physically observable witness operators and positive maps
Chen, K., & Wu, L.-A. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.022312 · Cited by 51
Asymptotic dynamics of quantum discord in open quantum systems
Berrada, K., Eleuch, H., & Hassouni, Y. (2011) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/14/145503 · Cited by 51
Generalized Information Theoretic Measure to Discern the Quantumness of Correlations
Devi, A. R. U., & Rajagopal, A. K. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.140502 · Cited by 51
ENTROPIC MEASURES OF NON-CLASSICAL CORRELATIONS
LANG, M. D., Caves, C. M., & Shaji, A. (2011) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s021974991100826x · Cited by 51
DYNAMICS AND EXTRACTION OF QUANTUM DISCORD IN A MULTIPARTITE OPEN SYSTEM
Bellomo, B., Compagno, G., Franco, R. L., Ridolfo, A., & Savasta, S. (2011) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749911008283 · Cited by 51
Experimental Validation of Quantum Steering Ellipsoids and Tests of Volume Monogamy Relations
Zhang, C., Cheng, S., Li, L., Liang, Q., Liu, B., Huang, Y., Li, C., Guo, G., Hall, M. J. W., Wiseman, H. M., et al. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.070402 · Cited by 52
Efficient Optimization of Cut-offs in Quantum Repeater Chains
Li, B., Coopmans, T. J., & Elkouss, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/qce49297.2020.00029 · Cited by 62
Distillability of entanglement in accelerated frames
Moradi, S. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.064301 · Cited by 51
Conditionalq-entropies and quantum separability: a numerical exploration
Batle, J. A. I., Plastino, A. R., Casas, M., & Plastino, A. R. (2002) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/48/307 · Cited by 51
Activating Distillation with an Infinitesimal Amount of Bound Entanglement
Vollbrecht, K. G. H., & Wolf, M. M. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.247901 · Cited by 57
Lower Bound for Electron Spin Entanglement from Beam Splitter Current Correlations
Burkard, G., & Loss, D. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.087903 · Cited by 53
Multipartite Entanglement of a Two-Separable State
Gerke, S., Sperling, J., Vogel, W., Cai, Y., Roslund, J., Treps, N., & Fabre, C. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.110502 · Cited by 50
Entanglement Thresholds for Random Induced States
Aubrun, G., Szarek, S. J., & Ye, D. (2013) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.21460 · Cited by 50
Banerjee, S., Ravishankar, V., & Srikanth, R. (2010) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.01.003 · Cited by 48
Generalized Smolin states and their properties
Augusiak, R., & Horodecki, P. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.012318 · Cited by 51
Entanglement reactivation in separable environments
Pirandola, S. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113046 · Cited by 49
Storage of hyperentanglement in a solid-state quantum memory
Tiranov, A., Lavoie, J., Ferrier, A., Goldner, P., Verma, V. B., Nam, S. W., Mirin, R. P., Lita, A. E., Marsili, F., Herrmann, H., et al. (2015) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.2.000279 · Cited by 50
Measure of nonlocality which is maximal for maximally entangled qutrits
Fonseca, E. A., & Parisio, F. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.030101 · Cited by 49
Evans, D. A., & Wiseman, H. M. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.012114 · Cited by 50
Quasiprobability representation of quantum coherence
Sperling, J., & Walmsley, I. A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.062327 · Cited by 51
Most incompatible measurements for robust steering tests
Bavaresco, J., Quintino, M. T., Guerini, L., Maciel, T. O., Cavalcanti, D., & Cunha, M. T. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.022110 · Cited by 50
Synthesizing arbitrary two-photon polarization mixed states
Wei, T.-C., Altepeter, J. B., Branning, D. A., Goldbart, P. M., James, D. F. V., Jeffrey, E. R., Kwiat, P. G., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Peters, N. A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.032329 · Cited by 48
DISTILLABILITY AND POSITIVITY OF PARTIAL TRANSPOSES IN GENERAL QUANTUM FIELD SYSTEMS
Verch, R., & WERNER, R. F. (2005) · Reviews in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1142/s0129055x05002364 · Cited by 58
Self-citationHe, J., Xu, S., & Ye, L. (2016) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.073 · Cited by 49
Local noise can enhance two-qubit teleportation
Yeo, Y. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.022334 · Cited by 49
Mixedness in the Bell violation versus entanglement of formation
Sibasish Ghosh, A., Kar, G., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.044301 · Cited by 47
Spectrum and entanglement of phonons in quantum fluids of light
Busch, X., Carusotto, I., & Parentani, R. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.043819 · Cited by 55
A family of generalized quantum entropies: definition and properties
Bosyk, G. M., Zozor, S., Holik, F., Portesi, M., & Lamberti, P. W. (2016) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-016-1329-5 · Cited by 48
Correlations between outcomes of random measurements
Tran, M. C., Dakić, B., Laskowski, W., & Paterek, T. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.042302 · Cited by 48
Genuinely entangled subspace with all-encompassing distillable entanglement across every bipartition
Agrawal, S., Halder, S., & Banik, M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032335 · Cited by 48
Gaussian entanglement revisited
Lami, L., Serafini, A., & Adesso, G. (2018) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 48
GHZ States, Almost-Complex Structure and Yang–Baxter Equation
Zhang, Y., & Ge, M. (2007) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-007-0064-3 · Cited by 48
Characterization of Combinatorially Independent Permutation Separability Criteria
Wocjan, P., & Horodecki, M. (2005) · Open Systems & Information Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11080-005-4483-2 · Cited by 48
Circulant states with positive partial transpose
Chruściński, D., & Kossakowski, A. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.032308 · Cited by 48
Distillability and positivity of partial transposes in general quantum field systemsPreprint
Verch, R., & Werner, R. F. (2004) · Cited by 52
Self-citationMachine learning meets quantum foundations: A brief survey
Bharti, K., Haug, T., Vedral, V., & Kwek, L.-C. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0007529 · Cited by 59
Entangled symmetric states of N qubits with all positive partial transpositions
Augusiak, R., Tura, J., Samsonowicz, J., & Lewenstein, M. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.042316 · Cited by 47
When Do Local Operations and Classical Communication Suffice for Two-Qubit State Discrimination?
Chitambar, E., Duan, R., & Hsieh, M.-H. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2013.2295356 · Cited by 47
Nonlocality in sequential correlation scenarios
Gallego, R., Würflinger, L. E., Chaves, R., Acín, A., & Navascués, M. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033037 · Cited by 47
Entanglement witnessing and quantum cryptography with nonideal ferromagnetic detectors
Kłobus, W., Grudka, A., Baumgartner, A., Tomaszewski, D., Schönenberger, C., & Martinek, J. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.125404 · Cited by 47
Entanglement robustness and geometry in systems of identical particles
Benatti, F., Roberto Floreanini, B., & Marzolino, U. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.042329 · Cited by 47
A Framework for Quantum-Secure Device-Independent Randomness Expansion
Brown, P. J., Ragy, S., & Colbeck, R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2019.2960252 · Cited by 53
Experimental demonstration of measurement-device-independent measure of quantum steering
Zhao, Y., Ku, H.-Y., Chen, S.-L., Chen, H., Nori, F., Xiang, G., Li, C., Guo, G., & Chen, Y.-N. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00307-9 · Cited by 47
Note on separability of the Werner states in arbitrary dimensions
Pittenger, A. O., & Rubin, M. H. (2000) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(00)00612-x · Cited by 47
Decoherence and entropy of primordial fluctuations. I. Formalism and interpretation
Campo, D., & Parentani, R. (2008) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.065044 · Cited by 60
Decoherence effects in interacting qubits under the influence of various environments
Das, S., & Agarwal, G. S. (2009) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/42/20/205502 · Cited by 49
Explicit product ensembles for separable quantum states
Schack, R., & Caves, C. M. (2000) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340008244050 · Cited by 44
Separability of two-party Gaussian states
Englert, B., & Wódkiewicz, K. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.054303 · Cited by 47
Polyhedral duality in Bell scenarios with two binary observables
Fritz, T. (2012) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4734586 · Cited by 46
PSEUDO-TELEPATHY: INPUT CARDINALITY AND BELL-TYPE INEQUALITIES
Gisin, N., Méthot, A. A., & Scarani, V. (2007) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s021974990700289x · Cited by 46
Shareability of correlations in multiqubit states: Optimization of nonlocal monogamy inequalities
Batle, J. A. I., Naseri, M., GHORANNEVISS, M., Farouk, A., Alkhambashi, M., & Elhoseny, M. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.032123 · Cited by 46
Classical and quantum tensor product expanders
Hastings, M. B., & Harrow, A. W. (2009) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic9.3-4-9 · Cited by 46
Tree-level entanglement in quantum electrodynamics
Fedida, S., & Serafini, A. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.116007 · Cited by 52
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment with Two Bose-Einstein Condensates
Colciaghi, P., Li, Y., Treutlein, P., & Zibold, T. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.021031 · Cited by 58
Quantifying nonclassicality with local unitary operations
Gharibian, S. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.042106 · Cited by 46
Entanglement and tensor product decomposition for two fermions
Caban, P., Podlaski, K., Rembieliński, J., Smoliński, K. A., & Walczak, Z. (2005) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/6/l02 · Cited by 46
QUANTUM LOCKING OF CLASSICAL CORRELATIONS AND QUANTUM DISCORD OF CLASSICAL-QUANTUM STATES
Boixo, S., Aolita, L., Cavalcanti, D., Modi, K. K., & Winter, A. (2011) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749911008301 · Cited by 45
Uncertainty relation in Schwarzschild spacetime
Feng, J., Zhang, Y.-Z., Gould, M. D., & Fan, H. (2015) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.058 · Cited by 46
Representation of entanglement by negative quasiprobabilities
Sperling, J., & Vogel, W. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.042337 · Cited by 46
Characterization and measurement of qubit-environment-entanglement generation during pure dephasing
Roszak, K., & Cywiński, Ł. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.032310 · Cited by 46
Measurement-induced nonlocality based on Wigner-Yanase skew information
Li, L., Wang, Q., Shen, S., & Li, M. (2016) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/114/10007 · Cited by 46
Separability of diagonal symmetric states: a quadratic conic optimization problem
Tura, J., Aloy, A., Quesada, R., Lewenstein, M., & Sanpera, A. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-01-12-45 · Cited by 46
High-Dimensional Entanglement in States with Positive Partial Transposition
Huber, M., Lami, L., Lancien, C., & Müller‐Hermes, A. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.200503 · Cited by 46
Quantum correlations in separable multi-mode states and in classically entangled light
Korolkova, N., & Leuchs, G. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab0c6b · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Werner, R. F.
- Affiliations
- Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Werner, Reinhard F.
- ORCID
- Werner, Reinhard F.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1989-10-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4277-4281
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062292260
- Cited by
- 4,062
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 124 · 2025: 199 · 2024: 200 · 2023: 225 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 189 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 188 · 2018: 166 · 2017: 169 · 2016: 205 · 2015: 163 · 2014: 160 · 2013: 181 · 2012: 190
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations, hidden variable models, generalized Bell inequalities, composite quantum systems, product states
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
