The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Abstract
A state of a composite quantum system is called classically correlated if it can be approximated by convex combinations of product states, and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlated otherwise. Any classically correlated state can be modeled by a hidden-variable theory and hence satisfies all generalized Bell's inequalities. It is shown by an explicit example that the converse of this statement is false.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which implies the well known fact8 that a given Werner state is separable iff its mixing parameter is .”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“This function reduces for to the well-known result that the Werner state violates the CHSH inequality iff the mixing parameter 8.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“By comparing Eq. (26) with Eq. (8), it is clearly seen that the Werner states for the mixing parameter are entangled, although they do not violate the CHSH inequality, as was first predicted in Ref.8.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“In Ref. ͓21͔, by using a setup similar to the one shown in Fig. 1, we have experimentally generated entangled twoqubit mixed states that lie upon and below the Werner curve in the linear entropy-tangle plane ͓41͔.”
From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“For pure states, this entanglement can be efficiently concentrated into singlets by the methods of [6], which use local operations and classical communication to transform n input states Υ into m singlets with a yield m/n approaching E (Υ) as n → ∞ .”
From Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels (1996) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Conversely, given n shared singlets, local actions and classical communication suffice to prepare m arbitrarily good copies of Υ with a yield m/n approaching 1 /E (Υ) as n →∞ .”
From Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels (1996) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
Bell's theorem. Experimental tests and implications
Clauser, J. F., & Shimony, A. (1978) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/41/12/002 · Cited by 1,551
An algebraic approach to quantum field theory
Haag, R., & Kastler, D. (1964) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1704187 · Cited by 1,250
On the Foundations of Quantum Physics
Piron, C. (1976) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1440-3_7 · Cited by 554
Foundations of Quantum Mechanics I
Ludwig, G. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86751-4 · Cited by 440
Bell’s inequalities and quantum field theory. I. General setting
Summers, S. J., & Werner, R. F. (1987) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.527733 · Cited by 245
Self-citationFarkas's Lemma and the nature of reality: Statistical implications of quantum correlations
Garg, A., & Mermin, N. D. (1984) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00741645 · Cited by 71
Drieschner, M. (2002) · Brill | mentis eBooks · doi:10.30965/9783969757246 · Cited by 47
Correlation Inequalities and Hidden Variables
Garg, A., & Mermin, N. D. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1220 · Cited by 46
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- G. Wittstock, 1974, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics and Ordered Linear Spaces, Vol. 29 of Lecture Notes in Physics
- S. J. Summers, 1988, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, 49, 215
- A. M. Gleason, 1957, J. Ration. Mech. Anal., 6, 885
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,010
Inflationary spectra and violations of Bell inequalities
Campo, D., & Parentani, R. (2006) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.025001 · Cited by 102
Testing quantum devices: Practical entanglement verification in bipartite optical systems
Häseler, H., Moroder, T., & Lütkenhaus, N. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.032303 · Cited by 89
From limits of quantum operations to multicopy entanglement witnesses and state-spectrum estimation
Horodecki, P. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.052101 · Cited by 98
Deterministic polarization entanglement purification using time-bin entanglement
Sheng, Y., & Zhou, L. (2014) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-2011/11/8/085203 · Cited by 88
Experimental measurement-device-independent verification of quantum steering
Kocsis, S., Hall, M. J. W., Bennet, A., Saunders, D. J., & Pryde, G. J. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6886 · Cited by 87
Distribution of entanglement in large-scale quantum networks
Perseguers, S., Lapeyre, G. J., Cavalcanti, D., Lewenstein, M., & Acín, A. (2013) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/9/096001 · Cited by 106
Al-Qasimi, A., & James, D. F. V. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.032101 · Cited by 87
Demonstration of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering with enhanced subchannel discrimination
Sun, K., Ye, X.-J., Xiao, Y., Xu, X.-Y., Wu, Y.-C., Xu, J.-S., Chen, J.-L., Li, C.-F., & Guo, G.-C. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0067-1 · Cited by 86
Noise robustness of the incompatibility of quantum measurements
Heinosaari, T., Kiukas, J., & Reitzner, D. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022115 · Cited by 86
Experimental Bound Entanglement in a Four-Photon State
Lavoie, J., Kaltenbaek, R., Piani, M., & Resch, K. J. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.130501 · Cited by 86
Conclusive Experimental Demonstration of One-Way Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering
Tischler, N., Ghafari, F., Baker, T. J., Slussarenko, S., Patel, R. B., Weston, M. M., Wollmann, S., Shalm, L. K., Verma, V. B., Nam, S. W., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.100401 · Cited by 87
Hirsch, F., Quintino, M. T., Vértesi, T., Navascués, M., & Brunner, N. (2017) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2017-04-25-3 · Cited by 86
Device-Independent Entanglement Certification of All Entangled States
Bowles, J., Šupić, I., Cavalcanti, D., & Acín, A. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.180503 · Cited by 91
A comparative study of relative entropy of entanglement, concurrence and negativity
Miranowicz, A., & Grudka, A. (2004) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/6/12/009 · Cited by 86
Separability criterion for separate quantum systems
Raymer, M. G., Funk, A., Sanders, B. C., & de Guise, H. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.052104 · Cited by 83
FROZEN DISCORD IN NON-MARKOVIAN DEPHASING CHANNELS
MAZZOLA, L., Piilo, J., & Maniscalco, S. (2011) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s021974991100754x · Cited by 83
A Few Steps More Towards NPT Bound Entanglement
Pankowski, Ł., Piani, M., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, P. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2010.2050810 · Cited by 89
Universal freezing of quantum correlations within the geometric approach
Cianciaruso, M., Bromley, T. R., Roga, W., Lo Franco, R., & Adesso, G. (2015) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 85
Quantum Steering: Practical Challenges and Future Directions
Xiang, Y., Cheng, S., Gong, Q., Ficek, Z., & He, Q. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.030102 · Cited by 92
Local unitary equivalence and entanglement of multipartite pure states
Kraus, B. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.032121 · Cited by 89
Family of Bell-like Inequalities as Device-Independent Witnesses for Entanglement Depth
Liang, Y.-C., Rosset, D., Bancal, J.-D., Pütz, G., Barnea, T. J., & Gisin, N. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.190401 · Cited by 83
Interplay between computable measures of entanglement and other quantum correlations
Girolami, D., & Adesso, G. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.052110 · Cited by 82
Tools for quantum network design
Azuma, K., Bäuml, S., Coopmans, T. J., Elkouss, D., & Li, B. (2021) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0024062 · Cited by 96
Pozas-Kerstjens, A., Gisin, N., & Tavakoli, A. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.010403 · Cited by 90
Asymptotic relative entropy of entanglement for orthogonally invariant states
Audenaert, K., Moor, B. D., Vollbrecht, K. G. H., & Werner, R. F. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.032310 · Cited by 84
Self-citationRole of memory errors in quantum repeaters
Hartmann, L., Kraus, B., Briegel, H. J., & Dür, W. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.032310 · Cited by 85
Quantum and classical separability of spin-orbit laser modes
Pereira, L. J., Khoury, A. Z., & Dechoum, K. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.053842 · Cited by 84
Three-tangle for mixtures of generalized GHZ and generalized W states
Eltschka, C., Osterloh, A., Siewert, J., & Uhlmann, A. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/4/043014 · Cited by 84
Classical states versus separable states
Li, N., & Luo, S. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.024303 · Cited by 83
All quantum states useful for teleportation are nonlocal resources
Cavalcanti, D., Acín, A., Brunner, N., & Vértesi, T. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.042104 · Cited by 83
Ashby-Pickering, R., Barr, A. J., & Wierzchucka, A. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2023)020 · Cited by 127
Proper monogamy inequality for arbitrary pure quantum states
Ou, Y.-C., Fan, H., & Fei, S.-M. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.012311 · Cited by 81
Horst, B., Bartkiewicz, K., & Miranowicz, A. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.042108 · Cited by 80
Semi-device-independent bounds on entanglement
Liang, Y.-C., Vértesi, T., & Brunner, N. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.022108 · Cited by 84
Obstructions to Bell CMB experiments
Martin, J., & Vennin, V. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.063501 · Cited by 96
Spotlighting quantum critical points via quantum correlations at finite temperatures
Werlang, T., Ribeiro, G. A. P., & Rigolin, G. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.062334 · Cited by 81
Structural approximations to positive maps and entanglement-breaking channels
Korbicz, J. K., Almeida, M. L., Bae, J., Lewenstein, M., & Acín, A. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.062105 · Cited by 79
Entanglement and Open Systems in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory
Clifton, R., & Halvorson, H. (2001) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(00)00033-2 · Cited by 82
Entanglement and Entropy Engineering of Atomic Two-Qubit States
Clark, S., & Parkins, A. S. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.047905 · Cited by 81
Guaranteed violation of a Bell inequality without aligned reference frames or calibrated devices
Shadbolt, P., Vértesi, T., Liang, Y.-C., Branciard, C., Brunner, N., & O’Brien, J. L. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00470 · Cited by 79
Steering criteria from general entropic uncertainty relations
Costa, A. C. S., Uola, R., & Gühne, O. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.050104 · Cited by 82
Augusiak, R., & Horodecki, P. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.010305 · Cited by 83
Quasiprobabilities for multipartite quantum correlations of light
Agudelo, E., Sperling, J., & Vogel, W. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.033811 · Cited by 79
Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality
Hirsch, F., Quintino, M. T., & Brunner, N. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.012129 · Cited by 77
Experimental violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality under decoherence
Xu, J., Li, C., Zou, X., & Guo, G. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00101 · Cited by 87
Spin squeezing and entanglement for an arbitrary spin
Vitagliano, G., Apellaniz, I., Egusquiza, I. L., & Tóth, G. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.032307 · Cited by 77
General Method for Constructing Local Hidden Variable Models for Entangled Quantum States
Cavalcanti, D., Guerini, L., Rabelo, R., & Skrzypczyk, P. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.190401 · Cited by 82
Relativity and Lorentz Invariance of Entanglement Distillability
Lamata, L., Martin-Delgado, M. A., & Solano, E. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.250502 · Cited by 78
Convergence to equilibrium under a random Hamiltonian
Brandão, F. G. S. L., Ćwikliński, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Korbicz, J. K., & Mozrzymas, M. (2012) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.86.031101 · Cited by 78
Nonequilibrium entanglement and noise in coupled qubits
Lambert, N., Aguado, R., & Brandes, T. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.045340 · Cited by 78
Asymmetry and coherence weight of quantum states
Bu, K., Anand, N., & Singh, U. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.032342 · Cited by 81
Self-testing of Pauli observables for device-independent entanglement certification
Bowles, J., Šupić, I., Cavalcanti, D., & Acín, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.042336 · Cited by 88
Bruß, D., Erdélyi, G., Meyer, T., Riege, T., & Rothe, J. (2007) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1242471.1242474 · Cited by 78
Bell inequalities and entanglement at quantum phase transitions in the XXZ model
Justino, L., & de Oliveira, T. R. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.052128 · Cited by 77
Witnessing bipartite entanglement sequentially by multiple observers
Bera, A., Mal, S., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.062304 · Cited by 74
Bilocal Bell Inequalities Violated by the Quantum Elegant Joint Measurement
Tavakoli, A., Gisin, N., & Branciard, C. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.220401 · Cited by 81
Dynamics of entropic measurement-induced nonlocality in structured reservoirs
Hu, M., & Fan, H. (2012) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2012.04.003 · Cited by 76
Postulates for measures of genuine multipartite correlations
Bennett, C. H., Grudka, A., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.012312 · Cited by 76
Further results on entanglement detection and quantification from the correlation matrix criterion
de Vicente, J. I. (2008) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/6/065309 · Cited by 76
Algorithmic Construction of Local Hidden Variable Models for Entangled Quantum States
Hirsch, F., Quintino, M. T., Vértesi, T., Pusey, M. F., & Brunner, N. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.190402 · Cited by 80
Quantum and Classical Correlations in Quantum Brownian Motion
Eisert, J., & Plenio, M. B. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.137902 · Cited by 82
Entanglement transfer from continuous variables to qubits
SON, W., KIM, M. S., LEE, J., & AHN, D. (2002) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340110120941 · Cited by 75
Nonlocality criteria for quantum teleportation
Gisin, N. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(96)80002-8 · Cited by 76
Information-theoretic aspects of the generalized amplitude-damping channel
Khatri, S., Sharma, K., & Wilde, M. M. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.012401 · Cited by 86
Tensor products of convex sets and the volume of separable states onNqudits
Aubrun, G., & Szarek, S. J. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.022109 · Cited by 74
Ghiu, I. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.012323 · Cited by 76
Entanglement swapping of noisy states: A kind of superadditivity in nonclassicality
Sen, A., Sen, U., Brukner, Č., Bužek, V., & Żukowski, M. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.042310 · Cited by 77
Nonlocality and entanglement in the XY model
Batle, J. A. I., & Casas, M. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.062101 · Cited by 73
Optimal entanglement witnesses for qubits and qutrits
Bertlmann, R. A., Durstberger-Rennhofer, K., Hiesmayr, B. C., & Krammer, P. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.052331 · Cited by 77
Quantum States with a Positive Partial Transpose are Useful for Metrology
Tóth, G., & Vértesi, T. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.020506 · Cited by 74
Concept of Orbital Entanglement and Correlation in Quantum Chemistry
Ding, L., Mardazad, S., Das, S., Szalay, S., Schollwöck, U., Zimborás, Z., & Schilling, C. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00559 · Cited by 77
Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair production at the LHC
Aoude, R., Madge, E., Fabio Maltoni, B., & Mantani, L. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.055007 · Cited by 81
Yao, Y., Li, H.-W., Zhang, C.-M., Yin, Z., Chen, W., Guo, G., & Han, Z. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.042102 · Cited by 76
Entropy exchange and entanglement in the Jaynes-Cummings model
Boukobza, E., & Tannor, D. J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.063821 · Cited by 74
Verifying the quantumness of a channel with an untrusted device
Pusey, M. F. (2015) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.32.000a56 · Cited by 70
2000]: ‘Entanglement and Open Systems in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory
Clifton, R., & Halvorson, H. (2000) · Cited by 73
Quantum teleportation via a two-qubit HeisenbergXYchain—effects of anisotropy and magnetic field
Yeo, Y., Liu, T., Lu, Y.-E., & Yang, Q.-Z. (2005) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/14/012 · Cited by 74
Principles of Quantum Communication Theory: A Modern ApproachPreprint
Khatri, S., Lami, L., & Wilde, M. M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.04672 · Cited by 297
Machine Learning Detection of Bell Nonlocality in Quantum Many-Body Systems
Deng, D.-L. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.240402 · Cited by 77
A new entanglement measure induced by the Hilbert-Schmidt norm
Witte, C., & Trucks, M. (1998) · Cited by 72
Conditional entropies and their relation to entanglement criteria
Vollbrecht, K. G. H., & Wolf, M. M. (2002) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1498490 · Cited by 75
Quantum coherence of steered states
Hu, X., Milne, A., Zhang, B., & Fan, H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19365 · Cited by 75
Schumann, R. H. (2018) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789813237230_0009 · Cited by 78
Measurement incompatibility does not give rise to Bell violation in general
Bene, E., & Vértesi, T. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa9ca3 · Cited by 77
Optimal Entanglement Certification from Moments of the Partial Transpose
Yu, X., Imai, S., & Gühne, O. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.060504 · Cited by 77
Quantum correlations and distinguishability of quantum states
Spehner, D. (2014) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4885832 · Cited by 70
Efficient quantum entanglement distribution over an arbitrary collective-noise channel
Sheng, Y., & Deng, F. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.042332 · Cited by 70
Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., & Yu, C. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11701 · Cited by 70
Entanglement, Bell Inequalities and Decoherence in Particle Physics
Bertlmann, R. A. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/11398448_1 · Cited by 80
Robust entanglement preparation against noise by controlling spatial indistinguishability
Nosrati, F., Castellini, A., Compagno, G., & Franco, R. L. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0271-7 · Cited by 71
Yang–Baxterizations, Universal Quantum Gates and Hamiltonians
Zhang, Y., Kauffman, L. H., & Ge, M. (2005) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-005-7655-7 · Cited by 75
Disentanglement and decoherence from classical non-Markovian noise: random telegraph noise
Zhou, D., Lang, A., & Joynt, R. (2010) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-010-0165-2 · Cited by 70
Quantum discord and multipartite correlations
Okrasa, M., & Walczak, Z. (2011) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/96/60003 · Cited by 70
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, P. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.1799 · Cited by 67
Méthot, A. A., & Scarani, V. (2007) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5555/2011706.2011716 · Cited by 69
Security of device-independent quantum key distribution protocols: a review
Primaatmaja, I. W., Goh, K. T., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Khoo, J. T.-F., Ghorai, S., & Lim, C. C. W. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-03-02-932 · Cited by 86
A new criterion for indecomposability of positive maps
Hall, W. (2006) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/45/020 · Cited by 67
Entanglement, EPR steering, and Bell-nonlocality criteria for multipartite higher-spin systems
He, Q., Drummond, P. D., & Reid, M. D. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.032120 · Cited by 66
Distributing Multipartite Entanglement over Noisy Quantum Networks
Bugalho, L., Coutinho, B. C., Monteiro, F. A., & Omar, Y. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-09-920 · Cited by 67
Quantum entanglement in analogue Hawking radiation: When is the final state nonseparable?
Busch, X., & Parentani, R. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.105024 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Werner, R. F.
- Affiliations
- Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Werner, Reinhard F.
- ORCID
- Werner, Reinhard F.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1989-10-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4277-4281
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062292260
- Cited by
- 4,062
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 124 · 2025: 199 · 2024: 200 · 2023: 225 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 189 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 188 · 2018: 166 · 2017: 169 · 2016: 205 · 2015: 163 · 2014: 160 · 2013: 181 · 2012: 190
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations, hidden variable models, generalized Bell inequalities, composite quantum systems, product states
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
