Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy

Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Heinzen, D. J.·1994·Physical Review A

Abstract

We investigate the properties of angular-momentum states which yield high sensitivity to rotation. We discuss the application of these ``squeezed-spin'' or correlated-particle states to spectroscopy. Transitions in an ensemble of N two-level (or, equivalently, spin-1/2) particles are assumed to be detected by observing changes in the state populations of the particles (population spectroscopy). When the particles' states are detected with 100% efficiency, the fundamental limiting noise is projection noise, the noise associated with the quantum fluctuations in the measured populations. If the particles are first prepared in particular quantum-mechanically correlated states, we find that the signal-to-noise ratio can be improved over the case of initially uncorrelated particles. We have investigated spectroscopy for a particular case of Ramsey's separated oscillatory method where the radiation pulse lengths are short compared to the time between pulses. We introduce a squeezing parameter ${\ensuremath{\xi}}_{\mathit{R}}$ which is the ratio of the statistical uncertainty in the determination of the resonance frequency when using correlated states vs that when using uncorrelated states. More generally, this squeezing parameter quantifies the sensitivity of an angular-momentum state to rotation. Other squeezing parameters which are relevant for use in other contexts can be defined. We discuss certain states which exhibit squeezing parameters ${\ensuremath{\xi}}_{\mathit{R}}$\ensuremath{\simeq}${\mathit{N}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1/2}$. We investigate possible experimental schemes for generation of squeezed-spin states which might be applied to the spectroscopy of trapped atomic ions. We find that applying a Jaynes-Cummings--type coupling between the ensemble of two-level systems and a suitably prepared harmonic oscillator results in correlated states with ${\ensuremath{\xi}}_{\mathit{R}}$1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.50.67

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,166

Metadata

Authors
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., & Heinzen, D. J.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1994-07-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
67-88
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2059235845
Cited by
1,166
References
4
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.50.67
The paper
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., & Heinzen, D. J. (1994). Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.50.67

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.