Cited by 151Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsAtomic and Molecular PhysicsNuclear physics research studies

Test of the linearity of quantum mechanics by rf spectroscopy of theBe+9ground state

Bollinger, J. J., Heinzen, D. J., Itano, Wayne M., Gilbert, S. L., Wineland, D. J.·1989·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

A hyperfine transition in the ground state of $^{9}\mathrm{Be}^{+}$ was used to test a nonlinear generalization of quantum mechanics recently formulated by Weinberg. We searched for a dependence of the frequency of a coherent superposition of two hyperfine states on the populations of the states. We are able to set a limit of 4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}27}$ on the fraction of binding energy per nucleon of the $^{9}\mathrm{Be}^{+}$ nucleus that could be due to nonlinear corrections to quantum mechanics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.63.1031

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A constraint on the dimension-five neutron operators of Equation (40) was derived using limits on the spatial variation of the Be+ hyperfine nuclear spin transition as a function of the angle between the spin axis and an external magnetic field.

    “A constraint of the dimension five operators of Equation (40) for neutrons was recently derived in [52] using limits on the spatial variation of the hyperfine nuclear spin transition in Be+ as a function of the angle between the spin axis and an external magnetic field [64].”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bollinger, J. J., Heinzen, D. J., Itano, W. M., Gilbert, S. L., & Wineland, D. J.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1989-09-04
Volume
63
Issue
10
Pages
1031-1034
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002719646
Cited by
151
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
Keywords
linearity of quantum mechanics, nonlinear quantum mechanics, hyperfine transitions, coherent superposition, RF spectroscopy, binding energy per nucleon, quantum foundations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review