Cited by 519Quantum optics and atomic interactionsStrong Light-Matter InteractionsQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity

Garraway, B. M.·1997·Physical Review A

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Atoms can nowadays be placed in increasingly exotic environments such as microscopic cavities and materials with photonic band gaps. High-Q cavities can now easily result in a strong coupling between an atom and its environment where perturbation theory should no longer be appropriate. The purpose of this paper is to describe the dynamics of a multilevel V-type atomic system (including the case of a two-level system) which interacts with a reservoir modeled by a generalized density of states. A theoretical construct, the pseudomode, is utilized to develop general methods for solution. Without using perturbation theory the equivalent master equation is developed and the relationship between the master equation, the pseudomodes, and the generalized density of states function is explored with examples. Utilizing a straightforward definition of the pseudomode, it is found that many functions for the density of states lead to problematic non-Lindblad master equations. Several examples are given, and it is shown how to convert the non-Lindblad master equations into a Lindblad form in these cases. The examples include a non-Lorentzian resonance and a simple model of a photonic band gap.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.55.2290

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups
Lindblad, G. (1976) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01608499 · Cited by 7,548
Resonance Absorption by Nuclear Magnetic Moments in a Solid
Purcell, E. M., Torrey, H. C., & Pound, R. V. (1946) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.69.37 · Cited by 6,259
An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics: Lectures Presented at the Université Libre de Bruxelles October 28 to November 4, 1991
Carmichael, H. (1993) · Lecture Notes in Physics Monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-47620-7 · Cited by 2,572
Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity
Weisbuch, C., Nishioka, M., Ishikawa, A., & Arakawa, Y. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.3314 · Cited by 2,557
Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics
Dalibard, J., Castin, Y., & Mølmer, K. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.580 · Cited by 1,979
Berechnung der nat�rlichen Linienbreite auf Grund der Diracschen Lichttheorie
Weisskopf, V. F., & Wigner, E. P. (1930) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1007/bf01336768 · Cited by 1,817
The Jaynes-Cummings Model
Shore, B. W., & Knight, P. L. (1993) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349314551321 · Cited by 1,338
Monte Carlo wave-function method in quantum optics
Mølmer, K., Castin, Y., & Dalibard, J. (1993) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.10.000524 · Cited by 1,272
Spontaneous emission near the edge of a photonic band gap
John, S., & Quang, T. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.1764 · Cited by 683
Anomalous Spontaneous Emission Time in a Microscopic Optical Cavity
Martini, F. D., Innocenti, G., Jacobovitz, G. R., & Mataloni, P. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2955 · Cited by 364

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

1995, Confined Electrons and Photons: New Physics and Applications
S. Swain, 1972, J. Phys. A, 5, 1592

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 519

Markovian semigroup from mixing noninvertible dynamical maps
Siudzińska, K. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.022605 · Cited by 14
Dual current anomalies and quantum transport within extended reservoir simulations
Wójtowicz, G., Elenewski, J. E., Rams, M. M., & Zwolak, M. P. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.165131 · Cited by 14
Markovian and non-Markovian master equations versus an exactly solvable model of a qubit in a cavity
Xia, Z., Garcia-Nila, J., & Lidar, D. A. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.014028 · Cited by 14
“In this model, the qubit system interacts with the cavity electromagnetic field through the dipole approximation [10].”
BackgroundMethod
Quenched decoherence in qubit dynamics due to strong amplitude-damping noise
Wu, S.-T. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.034301 · Cited by 14
Readout of the spectral density of an environment from the dynamics of an open system
Xu, S., Shen, H. Z., Yi, X. X., & Wang, W. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032108 · Cited by 14
Pseudomodes and the corresponding transformation of the temperature-dependent bath correlation function
Schönleber, D. W., Croy, A., & Eisfeld, A. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.052108 · Cited by 14
MLQD: A package for machine learning-based quantum dissipative dynamics
Ullah, A., & Dral, P. O. (2023) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108940 · Cited by 12
Local Disclosure of Quantum Memory in Non-Markovian Dynamics
Bäcker, C., Beyer, K., & Strunz, W. T. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.060402 · Cited by 13
Systematic and efficient pseudomode method to simulate open quantum systems under a bosonic environment
Zhou, L., Jin, G., & Yang, W. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.022221 · Cited by 14
Quantum neural network approach to Markovian dissipative dynamics of many-body open quantum systems
Long, C., Cao, L., Ge, L., Li, Q., Yan, Y., Xu, R., Wang, Y., & Zheng, X. H. (2024) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0220357 · Cited by 13
Capturing non-Markovian polaron dressing with the master equation formalism
Iles-Smith, J., Diba, O., & Nazir, A. (2024) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0228779 · Cited by 14
Pseudomode expansion of many-body correlation functions
Teretenkov, A. E., Uskov, F. G., & Lychkovskiy, O. V. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.174308 · Cited by 13
Fixing detailed balance in ancilla-based dissipative state engineering
Lambert, N., Cirio, M., Lin, J.-D., Menczel, P., Liang, P., & Nori, F. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043229 · Cited by 13
Realization of controllable open system with NMR
Ho, L. B., Matsuzaki, Y., Matsuzaki, M., & Kondo, Y. (2019) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab3a25 · Cited by 13
Evolution Equations for Quantum Semi-Markov Dynamics
Megier, N., Smirne, A., & Vacchini, B. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22070796 · Cited by 13
“[52] B.”
Background
Analytic expressions for the steady-state current with finite extended reservoirs
Zwolak, M. P. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0029223 · Cited by 13
Simple but accurate estimation of light–matter coupling strength and optical loss for a molecular emitter coupled with photonic modes
Wang, S., Chuang, Y.-T., & Hsu, L. (2021) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0060171 · Cited by 13
Non-Markovian dynamics of a single excitation within many-body dissipative systems
Burgess, A., & Marian Florescu, A. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.062207 · Cited by 13
Effect of control procedures on the evolution of entanglement in open quantum systems
Goyal, S. K., Banerjee, S., & Sibasish Ghosh, A. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.012327 · Cited by 13
Control of atomic decay rates via manipulation of reservoir mode frequencies
Linington, I. E., & (4461409), B. M. G. (2006) · Figshare · Cited by 13
The method of atomic-field collective operators in problems of interaction of atoms with a complex-structure field reservoir
Mogilevtsev, D. S., & Kilin, S. Y. (2002) · Optics and Spectroscopy · doi:10.1134/1.1509817 · Cited by 13
Quantum Mpemba effect from initial system–reservoir entanglement
Longhi, S. (2025) · APL Quantum · doi:10.1063/5.0266143 · Cited by 12
Entanglement witness and entropy uncertainty of an open quantum system under the Zeno effect
Liu, R., Zou, H., Yang, J., & Lin, D. (2021) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.401094 · Cited by 12
Particle current statistics in driven mesoscale conductors
Brenes, M., Guarnieri, G., Purkayastha, A., Eisert, J., Segal, D., & Landi, G. T. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.l081119 · Cited by 17
Bath-induced interactions and transient dynamics in open quantum systems at strong coupling: Effective Hamiltonian approach
Brenes, M., Min, B., Anto-Sztrikacs, N., Bar‐Gill, N., & Segal, D. (2024) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0207028 · Cited by 13
Dynamics of a Quantum System Interacting with White Non-Gaussian Baths: Poisson Noise Master Equation
Funo, K., & Ishizaki, A. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.170402 · Cited by 12
“(3) yields the following master equation as the Poisson white noise limit of the bath, where Γ +1 and Γ +2 are the noise rates; a is the noise strength that varies according to the probability p ( a ) = The figure shows that as Γ − 1 increases, the condition Γ + i ≪ Γ − 1 , λ is better satisfied…”
Background
Modeling the unphysical pseudomode model with physical ensembles: Simulation, mitigation, and restructuring of non-Markovian quantum noise
Cirio, M., Luo, S., Liang, P., Nori, F., & Lambert, N. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033083 · Cited by 12
Adapted projection operator technique for the treatment of initial correlations
Trevisan, A., Smirne, A., Megier, N., & Vacchini, B. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.052215 · Cited by 13
On the relationship between non-Markovianity and entanglement protection
Hamann, A. R., Massoni, E., & Zela, F. D. (2012) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/45/9/095501 · Cited by 12
Non-Markovian dynamics in atom-laser outcoupling from a double-well Bose–Einstein condensate
Lazarou, C., Nikolopoulos, G. M., & Lambropoulos, P. (2007) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/40/12/024 · Cited by 12
Few-photon quantum electrodynamics in a structured continuum
Nikolopoulos, G. M., & Lambropoulos, P. (2001) · Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/3/3/308 · Cited by 12
Quantum speed limit in terms of coherence variations
Mai, Z.-Y., & Yu, C. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.042425 · Cited by 12
“Suppose a two-level atom interacts with a leaky single-mode cavity [27, 85, 87].”
Pseudomode treatment of strong-coupling quantum thermodynamics
Albarelli, F., Vacchini, B., & Smirne, A. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad9499 · Cited by 11
“As anticipated in the introduction, we are going to exploit a nonperturbative method for the open-system evolution, which is based on the replacement of the physical bath with a simpler effective environment composed of dissipative surrogate oscillators, the pseudomodes [42, 43, 48].”
Method
Entropy production in open quantum systems: exactly solvable qubit models
Morozov, & RÖPKE, G. (2012) · Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.5488/cmp.15.43004 · Cited by 11
Steady State in Ultrastrong Coupling Regime: Expansion and First Orders
Latune, C. L. (2022) · Quanta · doi:10.12743/quanta.v11i1.167 · Cited by 11
Classical-driving-assisted quantum synchronization in non-Markovian environments
Xiao, X. M., Lu, T.-X., Zhong, W.-J., & Li, Y. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.022221 · Cited by 13
Quantum Speed Limit under Brachistochrone Evolution
Dou, F.-Q., Han, M.-P., & Shu, C. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.014031 · Cited by 11
Effects of relative phase and interactions on atom-laser outcoupling from a double-well Bose–Einstein condensate: Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics
Nikolopoulos, G. M., Lazarou, C., & Lambropoulos, P. (2008) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/41/2/025301 · Cited by 11
Some entanglement features exhibited by two, three and four qubits interacting with an environment in a non-Markovian regime
Hamadou-Ibrahim, A., Plastino, A. R., & Zander, C. (2010) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/5/055305 · Cited by 11
Quantum networks for single photon detection
Propp, T. B., & van Enk, S. J. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.033836 · Cited by 11
Graviton Physics: A Concise Tutorial on the Quantum Field Theory of Gravitons, Graviton Noise, and Gravitational Decoherence
Hsiang, J.-T., Cho, H.-T., & Hu, B. L. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10080306 · Cited by 23
Spectral theory of non-Markovian dissipative phase transitions
Debecker, B., Martin, J., & Damanet, F. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.042201 · Cited by 10
Critical frequency control for arbitrarily slow decoherence of a qubit
Giraldi, F., & Petruccione, F. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.062107 · Cited by 10
Macroscopic QED for quantum nanophotonics: emitter-centered modes as a minimal basis for multiemitter problems
Feist, J., Fernández‐Domínguez, A. I., & García-Vidal, F. J. (2021) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110710687-038 · Cited by 13
Accumulative reservoir construction: Bridging continuously relaxed and periodically refreshed extended reservoirs
Wójtowicz, G., Purkayastha, A., Zwolak, M., & Rams, M. M. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.035150 · Cited by 11
Entropy production in the mesoscopic-leads formulation of quantum thermodynamics
Lacerda, A. M., Kewming, M. J., Brenes, M., Jackson, C., Clark, S. R. L., Mitchison, M. T., & Goold, J. (2024) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.110.014125 · Cited by 10
Environment-assisted non-Markovian speedup dynamics control
Xu, K. D., Han, W., Zhang, Y., Xia, Y., & Fan, H. (2017) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2017.10.017 · Cited by 11
Deterministic quantum controlled-PHASE gates based on non-Markovian environments
Zhang, R., Chen, T., & Wang, X. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa9510 · Cited by 10
Quantum transport of energy in controlled synthetic quantum magnets
Bermúdez, A., & Schaetz, T. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083006 · Cited by 10
Recovering the lost steerability of quantum states within non-Markovian environments by utilizing quantum partially collapsing measurements
Sun, W.-Y., Wang, D., Ding, Z.-Y., & Ye, L. (2017) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/aa8e86 · Cited by 12
Non-Markovian entanglement dynamics of open quantum systems with continuous measurement feedback
Jiang, W., Wu, F.-Z., & Yang, G. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052134 · Cited by 10
Quantumness protection for open systems in a double-layer environment
Qiao, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Jing, J., & Zhu, S.-Y. (2019) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1459-2 · Cited by 11
Reservoir for inverse-power-law decoherence of a qubit
Giraldi, F., & Petruccione, F. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.012107 · Cited by 10
Comment on “Resonance fluorescence near a photonic band edge: Dressed-state Monte Carlo wave-function approach”
Mølmer, K., & Bay, S. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.904 · Cited by 10
Measurement of the linewidth of a home-built vacuum ultraviolet comb by frequency comb spectroscopy on NO2
Zhu, M., Xiao, Z., Zhang, H., Hua, L., Liu, Y., Zuo, Z., Xu, S., & Liu, X. (2024) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.519912 · Cited by 9
Tensor Network Approach to Sensing Quantum Light-Matter Interactions
Khan, A., Albarelli, F., & Datta, A. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/ljh3-3l4j · Cited by 16
Hierarchical equations of motion solved with the multiconfigurational Ehrenfest ansatz
Shi, Z., Zhou, H., Huang, L., Xie, R., & Wang, L. (2025) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0301142 · Cited by 13
Coupled Lindblad Pseudomode Theory for Simulating Open Quantum Systems
Huang, Z., Park, G., Chan, G. K., & Lin, L. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/qfkp-jc7s · Cited by 9
Long-time Markovianity of Multi-level Systems in the Rotating Wave Approximation
Teretenkov, A. E. (2021) · Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1995080221100218 · Cited by 9
“This model and its particular cases are widely used as a test model for many approaches to the open quantum systems [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 15].”
Method
Quantum speed limit for time-fractional open systems
Wei, D., Liu, H., Li, Y., Gao, F., Qin, S., & Wen, Q. (2023) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114065 · Cited by 11
Exact Hidden Markovian Dynamics in Quantum Circuits
Wang, H.-R., Yang, X.-Y., & Wang, Z. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.170402 · Cited by 9
Generation of entanglement density within a reservoir
Lazarou, C., Garraway, B. M., Piilo, J., & Maniscalco, S. (2011) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/6/065505 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Coping with attenuation of quantum correlations of two qubit systems in dissipative environments: multi-photon transitions
Golkar, S., & Tavassoly, M. K. (2018) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2018-90212-x · Cited by 9
Master equation for structured reservoirs
Mogilevtsev, D. S., Kilin, S. Y., & Cavalcanti, S. B. (2005) · Photonics and Nanostructures - Fundamentals and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.photonics.2005.07.001 · Cited by 9
Spontaneous emission properties of a quasi-continuum
Paspalakis, E., & Knight, P. L. (2000) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(99)00484-8 · Cited by 9
Coarse grained open system quantum dynamics
Thanopulos, I., Brumer, P. W., & Shapiro, M. (2008) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3010370 · Cited by 9
Nonequilibrium boundary-driven quantum systems: Models, methods, and properties
Landi, G. T., Poletti, D., & Schaller, G. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.045006 · Cited by 256
Standard form of master equations for general non-Markovian jump processes: The Laplace-space embedding framework and asymptotic solution
Kanazawa, K., & Sornette, D. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.023270 · Cited by 8
Entanglement revive and information flow within the decoherent environment
Shi, J., Wang, D., & Ye, L. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep30710 · Cited by 8
Generalized-rate-operator quantum jumps via realization-dependent transformations
Settimo, F., Luoma, K., Chruściński, D., Vacchini, B., Smirne, A., & Piilo, J. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.062201 · Cited by 10
Coarse-graining master equation for periodically driven systems
Hotz, R., & Schaller, G. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.052219 · Cited by 9
Quantum-parametric-oscillator heat engines in squeezed thermal baths: Foundational theoretical issues
Arısoy, O., Hsiang, J.-T., & Hu, B. L. (2022) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.105.014108 · Cited by 8
“[37] B. M. Garraway, Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity, Phys.”
Background
Non-Markovianity criteria for mixtures of noninvertible Pauli dynamical maps
Siudzińska, K. (2022) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac65c0 · Cited by 9
Adiabatic speedup and quantum heat current in an open system
Wu, J., Ren, F.-H., He, R.-H., Nie, S.-S., & Wang, Z.-M. (2022) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ac6d06 · Cited by 8
Time-Convolutionless Master Equations for Composite Open Quantum Systems
Karasev, A. Y., & Teretenkov, A. E. (2023) · Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1995080223060239 · Cited by 9
“This is due to the fact that these models are related by the pseudomode approach [37, 38, 39, 36, 40].”
Background
Dynamics of quantum discord in photonic crystals
Wang, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Huang, T., Sun, S., & Zhang, H. (2012) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2012.02.022 · Cited by 8
Modelling non-Markovian dynamics in photonic crystals with recurrent neural networks
Burgess, A., & Florescu, M. (2021) · Optical Materials Express · doi:10.1364/ome.425263 · Cited by 8
Transient properties of atomic coherence induced by an nonsingular-DOM reservoir
Du, C., Hu, Z., & Li, S. (2004) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2004.01.032 · Cited by 8
Exact decoherence dynamics of a single-mode optical field
An, J.-H., Yeo, Y., & Oh, C. H. (2009) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2009.04.005 · Cited by 8
A solvable dissipative Jaynes–Cummings model with initial correlation
Kitajima, S., Ban, M., & Shibata, F. (2013) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/46/22/224004 · Cited by 8
Reservoir cross-over in entanglement dynamics
Mazzola, L., Maniscalco, S., Suominen, K., & Garraway, B. M. (2009) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-009-0135-8 · Cited by 7
“We solved the dynamics using the pseudomode approach [ 15 ,16].Thepseudomode masterequation describes acoherent Tavis-Cummings type interaction between the qubits and the pseudomode, and the dissipative part involves the pseudomode only which leaks into a Markovian reservoir.”
MethodSelf-citation
Method of collective operators for resonance fluorescence near a photonic band edge
Mogilevtsev, D. S., & Kilin, S. Y. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.023815 · Cited by 8
Unifying methods for optimal control in non-Markovian quantum systems via process tensors
Ortega-Taberner, C., O'Neill, E., Butler, E. P., Fux, G. E., & Eastham, P. R. (2024) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0226031 · Cited by 7
q-entropies and the entanglement dynamics of two-qubits interacting with an environment
Hamadou-Ibrahim, A., Plastino, A. R., & Plastino, A. R. (2009) · Brazilian Journal of Physics · doi:10.1590/s0103-97332009000400010 · Cited by 7
Comparison of entanglement trapping among different photonic band gap models
Zhang, Y.-J., Yang, X.-Q., Han, W., & Xia, Y. (2013) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/22/9/090307 · Cited by 7
Regular patterns in the information flow of local dephasing channels
Giraldi, F. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.022109 · Cited by 8
Quantum speed limit time for the damped Jaynes-Cummings and Ohmic-like dephasing models in Schwarzschild space-time
Haseli, S. (2019) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7129-1 · Cited by 8
Exact Non-Markovian Evolution with Several Reservoirs
Teretenkov, A. E. (2020) · Physics of Particles and Nuclei · doi:10.1134/s1063779620040711 · Cited by 7
“Following [17] we call such degrees of freedom pseudomodes and following [20] we call the matrix V the optical potential.”
Method
Jump probabilities in the non-Markovian quantum jump method
Härkönen, K. (2010) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/6/065302 · Cited by 7
Nonequilibrium dynamics of the dispersive Jaynes–Cummings model by a non-Markovian quantum master equation
Ban, M. (2010) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/33/335305 · Cited by 7
Effects of interatomic collisions on atom-laser outcoupling
Nikolopoulos, G. M., Lambropoulos, P., & Proukakis, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/36/13/310 · Cited by 7
Reservoir cross-over in entanglement dynamics
(13697218), L. M., Maniscalco, S., Suominen, K., & (4461409), B. M. G. (2009) · Figshare · Cited by 7
Master equation for structured reservoirs
Mogilevtsev, D. S., Kilin, S. Y., & Cavalcanti, S. B. (2004) · Photonics and Nanostructures - Fundamentals and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.photonics.2004.08.002 · Cited by 7
Variational Approach to Entangled Non-Hermitian Open Systems
Zeng, J., Xie, W.-Q., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00018 · Cited by 7
Grassmann time-evolving matrix product operators: An efficient numerical approach for fermionic path integral simulations
Xu, X., Guo, C., & Chen, R. (2024) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0226167 · Cited by 6
“A family of master equation methods, including the pseudomode approach 69–72 and the auxiliary master equation 73–75 , is based on the concept of Markovian embedding by studying an extended effective system that captures non-Markovian dynamics under Markovian master equations.”
Method
Exact Quantum Electrodynamics of Radiative Photonic Environments
Yuen, B., & Demetriadou, A. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.203604 · Cited by 8
Parametric approximation as an open-quantum-system problem
Karasev, A. Y., & Teretenkov, A. E. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.052203 · Cited by 6
“It is also worth noting that the methods of unitary perturbation theory, which take into account the reversible depletion of the pump [25], are not directly applicable in this case.”
How to project onto an arbitrary single-photon wave packet
Propp, T. B., & van Enk, S. J. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.053707 · Cited by 6
“[100–104].”
Freezing and revival of quantum coherence in decoherent reservoir
Shi, J., Wang, Y., Liu, C., He, J., Yu, L., & Wu, T. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02892-2 · Cited by 6
Transport in a periodically driven tilted lattice via the extended reservoir approach: Stability criterion for recovering the continuum limit
De, B., Wójtowicz, G., Zakrzewski, J., Zwolak, M. P., & Rams, M. M. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.235148 · Cited by 6

Authors: Garraway, B. M.
Affiliations: Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author: Garraway, B. M.
ORCID: Garraway, B. M.
Venue: Physical Review A
Publisher: American Physical Society (APS)
Published: 1997-03-01
Volume: 55
Issue: 3
Pages: 2290-2303
ISSN: 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
1050-2947
1094-1622
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.55.2290
OpenAlex: W2069207980
Cited by: 518
References: 31
Citations by year: 2026: 53 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 19
FWCI: 5.75
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Locations: Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
Funders: European Commission
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics: Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords: atom-cavity coupling, two-level system, pseudomodes, Lindblad master equation, photonic band gap, high-Q cavity, open quantum systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks