Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum optics of lossy beam splitters

Barnett, Stephen M., Jeffers, John, Gatti, Alessandra, Loudon, Rodney·1998·Physical Review A

Abstract

The familiar input-output relations for an optical beam splitter are generalized to allow for linear absorption by the medium forming the mirror. Beam-splitter losses generally affect the noise levels detectable in experiments involving nonclassical light. When employed to investigate two-photon interference effects, a lossy beam splitter can lead to apparent nonlinear absorption, which, in the most extreme case, leads to either both or neither of the photons being absorbed. The degree of second-order coherence of antibunched light can be maintained on transmission through the beam splitter but any amplitude squeezing in the incident light is degraded.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.57.2134

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. H. J. Kimble, 1977, Phys. Rev. Lett., 39, 691, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.691 · DOI · Paper page
  2. D. F. Walls, 1994, Quantum Optics, 10.1007/978-3-642-79504-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. H. Khosravi, 1991, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 433, 337, 10.1098/rspa.1991.0052 · doi:10.1098/rspa.1991.0052
  4. H. Khosravi, 1992, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 436, 373, 10.1098/rspa.1992.0024 · doi:10.1098/rspa.1992.0024
  5. L. Allen, 1992, Opt. Commun., 93, 253, 10.1016/0030-4018(92)90537-2 · doi:10.1016/0030-4018(92)90537-2
  6. R. Matloob, 1995, Phys. Rev. A, 52, 4823, 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.4823 · DOI · Paper page
  7. R. Matloob, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 53, 4567, 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.4567 · DOI
  8. B. J. Dalton, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 54, 2292, 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.2292 · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.2292
  9. K. J. Blow, 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 42, 4102, 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.4102 · DOI · Paper page
  10. S. Prasad, 1987, Opt. Commun., 62, 139, 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90015-0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Z. Y. Ou, 1987, Opt. Commun., 63, 118, 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90271-9 · DOI · Paper page
  12. H. Fearn, 1987, Opt. Commun., 64, 485, 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90275-6 · DOI · Paper page
  13. R. A. Campos, 1989, Phys. Rev. A, 40, 1371, 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1371 · DOI · Paper page
  14. F. Wooten, 1972, Optical Properties of Solids
  15. B. Huttner, 1992, Phys. Rev. A, 46, 4306, 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.4306 · DOI · Paper page
  16. W. K. Lai, 1991, Phys. Rev. A, 43, 6323, 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.6323 · DOI · Paper page
  17. J. Janszky, 1991, J. Mod. Opt., 38, 2467, 10.1080/09500349114552601 · doi:10.1080/09500349114552601
  18. S. M. Barnett, 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 1739, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1739 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1739
  19. A. Bandilla, 1989, J. Mod. Opt., 36, 435, 10.1080/09500348914550531 · doi:10.1080/09500348914550531
  20. J. Jeffers, 1993, Phys. Rev. A, 47, 3291, 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.3291 · DOI
  21. J. Jeffers, 1994, J. Mod. Opt., 41, 1121, 10.1080/09500349414551061 · doi:10.1080/09500349414551061
  22. H. Fearn, 1989, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 6, 917, 10.1364/JOSAB.6.000917 · DOI
  23. R. Loudon, 1983, The Quantum Theory of Light
  24. D. Falkoff, 1969, Quantum Optics, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi,” Course 42
  25. G. Yeoman, 1993, J. Mod. Opt., 40, 1497, 10.1080/09500349314551561 · doi:10.1080/09500349314551561
  26. J. Brendel, 1988, Europhys. Lett., 5, 233, 10.1209/0295-5075/5/3/007 · DOI
  27. R. Lange, 1988, Europhys. Lett., 5, 619, 10.1209/0295-5075/5/7/008 · DOI
  28. J. G. Rarity, 1988, Photon Localization, Detection, Amplification and Antibunching
  29. R. Loudon, 1990, Coherence and Quantum Optics VI
  30. R. P. Feynman, 1965, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals
  31. L. H. Ryder, 1985, Quantum Field Theory
  32. R. J. Rivers, 1987, Path Integral Methods in Quantum Field Theory, 10.1017/CBO9780511564055 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511564055
  33. S. M. Barnett, 1991, Phys. Rev. A, 43, 6418, 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.6418 · doi:10.1103/physreva.43.6418
  34. A. Gatti, 1997, Phys. Rev. A, 56, 877, 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.877 · DOI
  35. M. B. Spencer, 1972, Phys. Rev. A, 5, 884, 10.1103/PhysRevA.5.884 · doi:10.1103/physreva.5.884
  36. R. Lang, 1973, Phys. Rev. A, 7, 1788, 10.1103/PhysRevA.7.1788 · DOI
  37. B. Baseia, 1984, Opt. Acta, 31, 39, 10.1080/713821390 · doi:10.1080/713821390
  38. J. C. Penaforte, 1984, Phys. Rev. A, 30, 1401, 10.1103/PhysRevA.30.1401 · doi:10.1103/physreva.30.1401
  39. J. C. Penaforte, 1985, Phys. Lett., 107A, 250, 10.1016/0375-9601(85)90208-7 · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(85)90208-7
  40. M. Ley, 1987, J. Mod. Opt., 34, 227, 10.1080/09500348714550251 · DOI
  41. P. M. Vissier, 1997, Opt. Commun., 136, 470, 10.1016/S0030-4018(96)00704-3 · doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(96)00704-3
  42. T. J. Shepherd, 1997, Phys. Rev. E, 55, 6024, 10.1103/PhysRevE.55.6024 · doi:10.1103/physreve.55.6024

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Barnett, S. M., Jeffers, J., Gatti, A., & Loudon, R.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
2134-2145
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2007101066
Cited by
186
References
6
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum optics of lossy beam splitters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.57.2134
The paper
Barnett, S. M., Jeffers, J., Gatti, A., & Loudon, R. (1998). Quantum optics of lossy beam splitters. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.57.2134

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.