The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correlated input-port, matter-wave interferometer: Quantum-noise limits to the atom-laser gyroscope
Abstract
I derive the quantum phase-noise limit to the sensitivity of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer in which the incident quantum particles enter via both input ports. I show that if the incident particles are entangled and correlated properly, then the phase sensitivity scales asymptotically like the Heisenberg-limited $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}=O(1/N),$ for large $N,$ where $N$ is the number of particles incident per unit time. (In a one-input-port device, the sensitivity can be at best $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}=1/\sqrt{N}.$) My calculation applies to bosons or fermions of arbitrary integer or half-integer spin. Applications to optical, atom-beam, and atom-laser gyroscopes are discussed---in particular, an atom-laser can be used to obtain the required entanglements for achieving this Heisenberg-limited sensitivity with atomic matter waves.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The states that maximize the QFI and yield the HS for decoherence-free unitary channels are typically highly entangled: the GHZ state in the case of atomic spectroscopy43, and the N00N state in the case of optical interferometry44.”
From The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology (2012) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics
Mandel, L., & Wolf, E. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644105 · Cited by 8,356
Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes
Dicke, R. H. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.93.99 · Cited by 7,445
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202
Walls, D. F., & Milburn, G. J. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79504-6 · Cited by 2,190
Kitagawa, M., & Ueda, M. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.5138 · Cited by 1,770
Observation of Interference Between Two Bose Condensates
Andrews, M. R., Townsend, C. G., Miesner, H. ‐., Durfee, D., Stamper-Kurn, D., & Ketterle, W. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5300.637 · Cited by 1,614
Cleve, R., EKERT, A. K., Macchiavello, C., & Mosca, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0164 · Cited by 1,399
SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers
Yurke, B., McCall, S. L., & Klauder, J. R. (1986) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.33.4033 · Cited by 1,381
Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states
Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Wineland, D. J., & Heinzen, D. J. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r4649 · Cited by 1,167
Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., & Heinzen, D. J. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.67 · Cited by 1,162
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104149 · Cited by 3,160
Quantum Key Distribution with High Loss: Toward Global Secure Communication
Hwang, W.-Y. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.057901 · Cited by 1,814
Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles
Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M. K., Schmied, R., & Treutlein, P. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035005 · Cited by 1,864
Quantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit
Boto, A. N., Kok, P., Abrams, D. S., Braunstein, S. L., Williams, C. P., & Dowling, J. P. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2733 · Cited by 1,494
Self-citationMultiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
“A specific twin-beam entanglement is the so-called “high NOON” type (Bouwmeester, 2004) state 26 of two beams a and b (Dowling, 1998; Kok et al., 2001, 2002): |NOON〉 = |N, 0; 0, N〉 = 1√ 2 (|N〉a|0〉b + |0〉a|N〉b).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowling, J. P.
- Affiliations
- U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dowling, Jonathan P.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4736-4746
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1985734554
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- matter-wave interferometry, Mach-Zehnder interferometer, entangled particles, Heisenberg limit, quantum noise, optical gyroscope, spin-1/2 particles, bosons and fermions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
