Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Security of quantum key distribution with entangled photons against individual attacks

Open access
Waks, Edo, Zeevi, Assaf, Yamamoto, Yoshihisa·2002·Physical Review A

Abstract

We investigate the security of quantum key distribution with entangled photons, focusing on the two-photon variation of the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol proposed in 1992 by Bennett, Brasard, and Mermin (BBM92). We present a proof of security which applies to realistic sources, and to untrustable sources which can be placed outside the labs of the two receivers. The proof is restricted to individual eavesdropping attacks, and assumes that the detection apparatus is trustable. We find that the average collision probability for the BBM92 protocol is the same as that of the BB84 protocol with an ideal single-photon source. This indicates that there is no analog in BBM92 to photon splitting attacks, and that the source can be placed between the two receivers without changing the form of the collision probability. We then compare the communication rate of both protocols as a function of distance, and show that BBM92 has potential for much longer communication distances, up to 170 km, in the presence of realistic experimental imperfections. Finally, we propose a scheme based on entanglement swapping that can lead to even longer distance communication. The limiting factor in this scheme is the channel loss, which imposes very slow communication rates at longer distances.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.65.052310

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. C. H. Bennett, 1992, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 3121, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3121 · DOI · Paper page
  2. B. Huttner, 1995, Phys. Rev. A, 51, 1863, 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.1863 · DOI · Paper page
  3. C. H. Bennett, 1992, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 557, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.557 · DOI · Paper page
  4. W. T. Buttler, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 5652, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5652 · DOI · Paper page
  5. P. D. Townsend, 1998, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 10, 1048, 10.1109/68.681313 · DOI
  6. C. Marand, 1995, Opt. Lett., 20, 1695, 10.1364/OL.20.001695 · DOI · Paper page
  7. G. Rigbordy, 2000, J. Mod. Opt., 47, 517, 10.1080/09500340008244057 · DOI
  8. M. Bourennane, 1999, Opt. Express, 4, 383, 10.1364/OE.4.000383 · DOI
  9. W. Tittel, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 4150, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4150 · DOI
  10. T. Jennewein, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 4729, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4729 · DOI · Paper page
  11. W. Tittel, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 4737, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4737 · DOI · Paper page
  12. D. S. Naik, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 4733, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4733 · DOI · Paper page
  13. A. K. Ekert, 1994, Phys. Rev. A, 50, 1047, 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.1047 · DOI
  14. B. Huttner, 1994, J. Mod. Opt., 41, 2455, 10.1080/09500349414552301 · DOI
  15. C. A. Fuchs, 1997, Phys. Rev. A, 56, 1163, 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.1163 · DOI · Paper page
  16. B. A. Slutsky, 1998, Phys. Rev. A, 57, 2383, 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.2383 · DOI
  17. N. Lütkenhaus, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 3301, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3301 · DOI
  18. N. Lütkenhaus, 2000, Phys. Rev. A, 61, 052304, 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052304 · DOI · Paper page
  19. E. Biham, 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 2256, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2256 · DOI
  20. D. Mayers, 2001, J. ACM, 48, 351, 10.1145/382780.382781 · DOI · Paper page
  21. P. W. Shor, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 441, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441 · DOI · Paper page
  22. H. K. Lo, 1999, Science, 283, 2050, 10.1126/science.283.5410.2050 · DOI · Paper page
  23. G. Brassard and, 1994, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  24. C. H. Bennett, 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 41, 1915, 10.1109/18.476316 · DOI · Paper page
  25. C. Cachin, 1997, J. Cryptology, 10, 97, 10.1007/s001459900023 · DOI
  26. O. Benson, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 2513, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2513 · DOI · Paper page
  27. J. W. Pan, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 3891, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3891 · DOI · Paper page
  28. N. Lütkenhaus, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 54, 97, 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.97 · DOI

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Waks, E., Zeevi, A., & Yamamoto, Y.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2002-04-25
Volume
65
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W1966784816
Cited by
261
References
3
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Security of quantum key distribution with entangled photons against individual attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.65.052310
The paper
Waks, E., Zeevi, A., & Yamamoto, Y. (2002). Security of quantum key distribution with entangled photons against individual attacks. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.65.052310

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.