Cited by 915

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiparty entanglement in graph states

Hein, M., Eisert, J., Briegel, H. J.·2004·Physical Review A

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.69.062311

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Z measurement removes a qubit from a cluster and severs all its bonds; an X measurement removes the qubit but transfers all its bonds to a neighbour, and other neighbours become singly connected to that neighbour.

    “A Z measurement removes a qubit from a cluster and severs all the bonds that it had with the cluster (Raussendorf et al. 2003;Hein et al. 2004).An X measurement on a qubit in a cluster removes that qubit from the cluster, and it will transfer all the bonds of the original qubit to a neighbour.All the other neighbours become single connected qubits to the neighbour that inherited the bonds (Rauss”

    From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Hein et al. 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. D. B. West, 2001, Introduction to Graph Theory
  2. R. Diestel, 2000, Graph Theory
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.107903 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.910 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022306 · DOI
  7. D. Schlingemann, 2002, Quantum Inf. Comput., 2, 307, 10.26421/QIC2.4-4 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.032110 · DOI · Paper page
  9. J. I. Latorre, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 048, 10.26421/QIC4.1-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.042327 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.087903 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.022112 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.052302 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.027901 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012322 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.012313 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.062108 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/325 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042307 · DOI
  21. 10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/305 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147902 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/0012-365X(93)90357-Y · DOI
  25. M. A. Nielsen, 2000, Quantum Computation and Information
  26. D. Gottesman, 1999, Proceedings of the XXII International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052317 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.032302 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.090402 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.012307 · DOI
  31. 10.1088/0305-4470/33/48/316 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.012308 · DOI
  33. A. Acin, 2003, Quantum Inf. Comput., 3, 55, 10.26421/QIC3.1-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hein, M., Eisert, J., & Briegel, H. J.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2004-06-09
Volume
69
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
Cited by
915
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review