Cited by 795Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Entanglement of Atoms via Cold Controlled Collisions

Open access
Jaksch, D., Briegel, H.-J., Cirac, J. I., Gardiner, C. W., Zoller, P.·1999·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We show that by using cold controlled collisions between two atoms one can achieve conditional dynamics in moving trap potentials. We discuss implementing two qubit quantum gates and efficient creation of highly entangled states of many atoms in optical lattices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.82.1975

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In optical lattices, tuning the polarization of trapping lasers can induce entangling interactions between neighboring atoms and create a cluster state across the whole lattice.

    “Tuning the polarization of the trapping lasers can induce entangling interactions 22,23 between neighboring atoms across the array and create a cluster state across the whole lattice 20,24,25 .”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [22]

  • State-dependent entangling operations can be realized in parallel across an optical lattice by tuning the trapping fields.

    “Statedependent entangling operations can be realised in parallel across the lattice, by tuning the trapping fields 22 .”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaksch, D., Briegel, H.-J., Cirac, J. I., Gardiner, C. W., & Zoller, P.
Affiliations
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
82
Issue
9
Pages
1975-1978
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2084336605
Cited by
795
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 21
FWCI
26.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
atom entanglement, cold atom collisions, conditional dynamics, two-qubit gates, optical lattices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review