The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trojan-horse attacks on quantum-key-distribution systems
Open accessAbstract
General Trojan-horse attacks on quantum-key-distribution systems, i.e., attacks on Alice or Bob's system via the quantum channel, are analyzed. We illustrate the power of such attacks with today's technology and conclude that all systems must implement active counter measures. In particular, all systems must include an auxiliary detector that monitors any incoming light. We show that such counter measures can be efficient, provided that enough additional privacy amplification is applied to the data. We present a practical way to reduce the maximal information gain that an adversary can gain using Trojan-horse attacks. This does reduce the security analysis of the two-way plug-and-play implementation to those of the standard one-way systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Self-citationQuantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
(2002) · doi:10.1007/0-306-47120-5 · Cited by 1,029
Cited by
Advances in quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., et al. (2020) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.361502 · Cited by 2,033
Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,543
Field test of quantum key distribution in the Tokyo QKD Network
Sasaki, M., Fujiwara, M., Ishizuka, H., Klaus, W., Wakui, K., Takeoka, M., Miki, S., Yamashita, T., Wang, Z., Tanaka, A., et al. (2011) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.19.010387 · Cited by 1,082
Self-citationZhao, Y., Fung, C.-H. F., Qi, B., Chen, C., & Lo, H.-K. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.042333 · Cited by 511
Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system
Gerhardt, I., Liu, Q., Lamas-Linares, A., Skaar, J., Kurtsiefer, C., & Makarov, V. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1348 · Cited by 436
Metadata
- Authors
- Gisin, N., Fasel, S., Kraus, B., Zbinden, H., & Ribordy, G.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2006-02-13
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1968204762
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trojan-horse attacks on quantum-key-distribution systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.73.022320
- The paper
- Gisin, N., Fasel, S., Kraus, B., Zbinden, H., & Ribordy, G. (2006). Trojan-horse attacks on quantum-key-distribution systems. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.73.022320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
