The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum hacking: Experimental demonstration of time-shift attack against practical quantum-key-distribution systems
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If the maximally mixed polarization state is created by using one photon from a maximally entangled singlet state, then 2/3 of the time the other photon in the singlet state will have the orthogonal polarization of the cloned states, and 1/3 of the time the same polarization, effectively implementing an optimal universal NOT gate.
“Suppose we created the maximally mixed polarization state by using one of the photons from a maximally entangled singlet state.Then 2/3 of the time, the other photon in the singlet state will have the orthogonal polarization of the cloned states, and 1/3 of the time the same polarization.This effectively implements an optimal universal NOT gate [118,119]-itself a non-unitary operation.”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [118]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- C. H. Bennett, 1984, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing
- 10.1145/382780.382781 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.283.5410.2050 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2818 · DOI · Paper page
- D. Gottesman, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 325
- 10.1140/epjd/e2007-00010-4 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057901 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230503 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012326 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012322 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.070502 · DOI
- Y. Zhao, 2006, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.010503 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1418 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/447372a · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022313 · DOI
- V. Makarov, 2008, Quantum Inf. Comput., 8, 0622
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.042327 · DOI
- 10.1364/OE.15.009388 · DOI
- B. Qi, 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 73
- 10.1088/1367-2630/9/9/319 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/341 · DOI
- 10.1049/el:20071726 · DOI
- G. Brassard, 1994, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- H.-K. Lo, 2005, Quantum Inf. Comput., 5, 413
- 10.1088/1742-6596/36/1/016 · DOI
- M. Ben-Or, 2005, Theory of Cryptography: Second Theory of Cryptography Conference, TCC 2005
- R. Renner, 2005, Theory of Cryptography: Second Theory of Cryptography Conference, TCC 2005
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022320 · DOI
- C. H. Bennett, 1992, Jet Cryptogr., 5, 3
- 2005, Proceedings of IEEE Information Theory Workshop on Theory and Practice in Information Theoretic Security
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem
Pironio, S., Acín, A., Massar, S., de la Giroday, A. B., Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., Olmschenk, S., Hayes, D., Luo, L., Manning, T. A., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09008 · Cited by 1,420
Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber
Yin, H.-L., Chen, T.-Y., Yu, Z.-W., Liu, H., You, L.-X., Zhou, Y.-H., Chen, S.-J., Mao, Y., Huang, M.-Q., Zhang, W.-J., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.190501 · Cited by 836
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Security of practical private randomness generation
Pironio, S., & Massar, S. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.012336 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Fung, C.-H. F., Qi, B., Chen, C., & Lo, H.-K.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-10-28
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
