CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,082

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Field test of quantum key distribution in the Tokyo QKD Network

Sasaki, M., Fujiwara, M., Ishizuka, H., Klaus, W., Wakui, K., Takeoka, M., Miki, S., Yamashita, T., Wang, Z., Tanaka, A., Yoshino, K., Nambu, Y., Takahashi, S., Tajima, A., Tomita, A., Domeki, T., Hasegawa, T., Sakai, Y., Kobayashi, H., Asai, T., Shimizu, K., Tokura, T., Tsurumaru, T., Matsui, M., Honjo, T., Tamaki, K., Takesue, H., Tokura, Y., Dynes, J. F., Dixon, A. R., Sharpe, A. W., Yuan, Z. L., Shields, A. J., Uchikoga, S., Legré, M., Robyr, S., Trinkler, P., Monat, L., Page, J.-B., Ribordy, G., Poppe, A., Allacher, A., Maurhart, O., Länger, T., Peev, M., Zeilinger, A.·2011·Optics Express
DOI 10.1364/oe.19.010387
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.19.010387

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Entanglement purification allows circumventing entanglement loss by extracting high-quality entangled pairs from an ensemble using only local transformations and classical communication.

    “Entanglement purification allows to circumvent this issue by extracting high-quality entangled pairs from a given ensemble using only local transformations and classical communication [328].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [328]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Scarani, 2009, Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, 1301, 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301 · DOI
  2. Gottesman, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 5, 325
  3. Peev, 2009, N. J. Phys., 11, 075001, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/075001 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Länger, 2009, N. J. Phys., 11, 055051, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/5/055051 · DOI
  5. Mirza, 2010, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 27, A185, 10.1364/JOSAB.27.00A185 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Yuan, 2005, Opt. Express, 13, 660, 10.1364/OPEX.13.000660 · DOI
  7. Chapuran, 2009, N. J. Phys., 11, 105001, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/105001 · DOI
  8. Wang, 2010, Opt. Lett., 35, 2454, 10.1364/OL.35.002454 · DOI
  9. Fujiwara, 2010, Opt. Express, 18, 22199, 10.1364/OE.18.022199 · DOI
  10. Hwang, 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 057901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057901 · DOI
  11. Lo, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 230504, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wang, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 230503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230503 · DOI
  13. Inoue, 2003, Phys. Rev. A, 68, 022317, 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022317 · DOI
  14. Bennett, 1992, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 557, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.557 · DOI
  15. Scarani, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 057901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.057901 · DOI
  16. Tanaka, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 11354, 10.1364/OE.16.011354 · DOI
  17. Miki, 2010, Opt. Lett., 35, 2133, 10.1364/OL.35.002133 · DOI
  18. Ma, 2005, Phys. Rev. A, 72, 012326, 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012326 · DOI
  19. Zhao, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 070502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.070502 · DOI
  20. Hayashi, 2007, Phys. Rev. A, 76, 012329, 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.012329 · DOI
  21. Hayashi, 2007, N. J. Phys., 9, 284, 10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/284 · DOI
  22. Dixon, 2010, Appl. Phys. Lett., 96, 161102, 10.1063/1.3385293 · DOI
  23. Yuan, 2007, Appl. Phys. Lett., 91, 041114, 10.1063/1.2760135 · DOI
  24. Dixon, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 18790, 10.1364/OE.16.018790 · DOI
  25. Yuan, 2007, Appl. Phys. Lett., 91, 041114, 10.1063/1.2760135 · DOI
  26. Brassard, 1994, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 765, 410, 10.1007/3-540-48285-7_35 · DOI
  27. Takesue, 2007, Nat. Photonics, 1, 343, 10.1038/nphoton.2007.75 · DOI
  28. Waks, 2006, Phys. Rev. A, 73, 012344, 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012344 · DOI
  29. Honjo, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 9053, 10.1364/OE.17.009053 · DOI
  30. Treiber, 2009, N. J. Phys., 11, 045013, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045013 · DOI
  31. Vakhitov, 2001, J. Mod. Opt., 48, 2023, 10.1080/09500340108240904 · DOI
  32. Makarov, 2005, J. Mod. Opt., 52, 691, 10.1080/09500340410001730986 · DOI
  33. Gisin, 2006, Phys. Rev. A, 73, 022320, 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022320 · DOI
  34. Makarov, 2006, Phys. Rev. A, 74, 022313, 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022313 · DOI
  35. Lamas-Linares, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 9388, 10.1364/OE.15.009388 · DOI
  36. Qi, 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 73
  37. Fung, 2007, Phys. Rev. A, 75, 032314, 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032314 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Zhao, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 78, 042333, 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042333 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Makarov, 2008, Quantum Inf. Comput., 8, 0622
  40. Nauerth, 2009, N. J. Phys., 11, 065001, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/6/065001 · DOI
  41. Lydersen, 2010, Nat. Photonics, 4, 686, 10.1038/nphoton.2010.214 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Xu, 2010, N. J. Phys., 12, 113026, 10.1088/1367-2630/12/11/113026 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sasaki, M., Fujiwara, M., Ishizuka, H., Klaus, W., Wakui, K., Takeoka, M., Miki, S., Yamashita, T., Wang, Z., Tanaka, A., Yoshino, K., Nambu, Y., Takahashi, S., Tajima, A., Tomita, A., Domeki, T., Hasegawa, T., Sakai, Y., Kobayashi, H., Asai, T., Shimizu, K., Tokura, T., Tsurumaru, T., Matsui, M., Honjo, T., Tamaki, K., Takesue, H., Tokura, Y., Dynes, J. F., Dixon, A. R., Sharpe, A. W., Yuan, Z. L., Shields, A. J., Uchikoga, S., Legré, M., Robyr, S., Trinkler, P., Monat, L., Page, J.-B., Ribordy, G., Poppe, A., Allacher, A., Maurhart, O., Länger, T., Peev, M., & Zeilinger, A.
Venue
Optics Express
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2011-05-11
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
10387
ISSN
1094-4087
DOI
10.1364/oe.19.010387
Cited by
1,082
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review