Cited by 30Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systems

Elementary proof of the bound on the speed of quantum evolution

Open access
Kosiński, Piotr, Zych, Magdalena·2006·Physical Review A

Abstract

An elementary proof is given of the bound on "ortogonalization time".

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.73.024303

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Margolus-Levitin theorem states that the shortest time for a quantum state to evolve into an orthogonal state is limited by the initial energy.

    “The Margolus-Levitin theorem [6] suggests that the shortest time for a quantum state to evolve into an orthogonal state is limited by the initial energy.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [3][3] S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002), 237901 -
  2. [6][6] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, Proc. of the SPIE, vol. 5111 (2003), 1 -
  3. [7][7] L. Mandelstam, I. Tamm, Journ. Phys. (USSR) 9 (1945), 249 -
  4. [12][12] L. Vaidman, Am. Journ. Phys. 60 (1992), 182 -
  5. [14][14] P. Pfeifer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993), 3365 -
  6. [15][15] J. Uffink, Am. Jour. Phys. 61 (1993), 935 -
  7. [16][16] J. Anandan, Y. Aharonov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990), 1697 -
  8. [21][21] M. Reed, B. Simon, 'Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics', vol.1, Academic Press New York, Londyn,1972

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kosiński, P., & Zych, M.
Affiliations
University of Łódź (PL)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2006-02-14
Volume
73
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2040238505
Cited by
30
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum state evolution, elementary proof

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review