Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 508

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Entanglement, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations, Bell nonlocality, and steering

Open access
Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M., Doherty, A. C.·2007·Physical Review A

Abstract

In a recent work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007)] we defined ``steering,'' a type of quantum nonlocality that is logically distinct from both nonseparability and Bell nonlocality. In the bipartite setting, it hinges on the question of whether Alice can affect Bob's state at a distance through her choice of measurement. More precisely and operationally, it hinges on the question of whether Alice, with classical communication, can convince Bob that they share an entangled state under the circumstances that Bob trusts nothing that Alice says. We argue that if she can, then this demonstrates the nonlocal effect first identified in the famous Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paper [Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)] as a universal effect for pure entangled states. This ability of Alice to remotely prepare Bob's state was subsequently called steering by Schr\"odinger, whose terminology we adopt. The phenomenon of steering has been largely overlooked, and prior to our work had not even been given a rigorous definition that is applicable to mixed states as well as pure states. Armed with our rigorous definition, we proved that steerable states are a strict subset of the entangled states, and a strict superset of the states that can exhibit Bell nonlocality. In this work we expand on these results and provide further examples of steerable states. We also elaborate on the connection with the original EPR paradox.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.76.052116

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. E. Schrödinger, 1935, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 31, 553
  2. K. Zhou, 1996, Optimal and Robust Control
  3. G. Gutoski, 2007, Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Symposium on Theory of Computing
  4. R. Cleve, 2004, Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity
  5. 10.1088/0305-4470/21/13/016 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/21/13/016

Cited by

See all 508

Metadata

Authors
Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M., & Doherty, A. C.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2007-11-28
Volume
76
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2070915873
Cited by
508
References
39
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entanglement, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations, Bell nonlocality, and steering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.76.052116
The paper
Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M., & Doherty, A. C. (2007). Entanglement, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations, Bell nonlocality, and steering. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.76.052116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.