Cited by 141Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantifying, characterizing, and controlling information flow in ultracold atomic gases

Open access
Haikka, P., McEndoo, S., De Chiara, G., Palma, G. M., Maniscalco, S.·2011·Physical Review A

Abstract

We study quantum information flow in a model comprised of a trapped impurity qubit immersed in a Bose-Einstein-condensed reservoir. We demonstrate how information flux between the qubit and the condensate can be manipulated by engineering the ultracold reservoir within experimentally realistic limits. We show that this system undergoes a transition from Markovian to non-Markovian dynamics, which can be controlled by changing key parameters such as the condensate scattering length. In this way, one can realize a quantum simulator of both Markovian and non-Markovian open quantum systems, the latter ones being characterized by a reverse flow of information from the background gas (reservoir) to the impurity (system).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.84.031602

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 36 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–141 of 141

Metadata

Authors
Haikka, P., McEndoo, S., De Chiara, G., Palma, G. M., & Maniscalco, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2011-09-20
Volume
84
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W1998640974
Cited by
141
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (00343)
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
  • Emil Aaltosen Säätiö
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
quantum information flow, ultracold atoms, Bose-Einstein condensate, non-Markovian dynamics, Markovian dynamics, open quantum systems, quantum simulation, information backflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review