Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Limits to multipartite entanglement generation with bosons and fermions

Tichy, Malte C., Mintert, Florian, Buchleitner, Andreas·2013·Physical Review A

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.87.022319

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This is a proof for atomic bunching.

    “and as such a proof for atomic bunching [193].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [193]

  • In the 4He BEC experiment, the cross-correlation measurements showed a clear dip with visibility 0.65±0.07, above the classical limit of 0.5.

    “the results show a clear dip in the cross-correlation measurements with a visibility of 0.65±0.07,which is above the classical limit of 0.5”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [193]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 87

  1. J. Bell, 1964, Phys., 1, 195, 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.460 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2921 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1345 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/nphys507 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150501 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.020503 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.020504 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.354 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/ncomms1556 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.022311 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nature07125 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.130503 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2594 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.180502 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.220501 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.240401 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.110503 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.012306 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.010503 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.050304 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.022308 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.193602 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.033833 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.022312 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.053601 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.053842 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062311 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3295 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.116 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.030301 · DOI · Paper page
  36. S. Aaronson, 2011, STOC '11 Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.022328 · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.070503 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.020504 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.050501 · DOI
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.052330 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.180502 · DOI
  43. 10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093015 · DOI
  44. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022306 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.130502 · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.1167209 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042324 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/lpor.200810007 · DOI
  50. 10.1088/0953-4075/44/19/192001 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1002/prop.200310051 · DOI
  53. 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.012109 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/prop.201200079 · DOI
  55. M. A. Nielsen, 2000, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
  56. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042326 · DOI
  58. D. S. Bernstein, 2009, Matrix Mathematics, 10.1515/9781400833344 · DOI
  59. 10.1364/OE.20.023126 · DOI
  60. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.436 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1080/09500340008244048 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.042332 · DOI
  63. 10.1007/BF02960953 · DOI
  64. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.012113 · DOI
  65. V. N. Sachkov, 2002, Combinatorics of Non-Negative Matrices, 10.1090/mmono/213 · DOI
  66. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2513 · DOI
  67. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062111 · DOI
  68. 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.030101 · DOI
  69. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.052315 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1140/epjd/e2010-10337-2 · DOI
  71. 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.034309 · DOI
  72. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042321 · DOI
  73. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.060504 · DOI
  74. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.012314 · DOI
  75. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.080504 · DOI
  76. 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.012104 · DOI
  77. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/073025 · DOI
  78. 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.052315 · DOI
  79. 10.1038/nature11361 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.052308 · DOI
  82. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.030502 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.020501 · DOI
  84. 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.052112 · DOI
  85. 10.1098/rsta.1894.0004 · DOI
  86. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1924-1501282-2 · DOI
  87. 10.1080/14786449408620669 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tichy, M. C., Mintert, F., & Buchleitner, A.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2013-02-14
Volume
87
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
Cited by
12
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review