The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum Teleportation Between Distant Matter Qubits
Abstract
Quantum teleportation is the faithful transfer of quantum states between systems, relying on the prior establishment of entanglement and using only classical communication during the transmission. We report teleportation of quantum information between atomic quantum memories separated by about 1 meter. A quantum bit stored in a single trapped ytterbium ion (Yb + ) is teleported to a second Yb + atom with an average fidelity of 90% over a replete set of states. The teleportation protocol is based on the heralded entanglement of the atoms through interference and detection of photons emitted from each atom and guided through optical fibers. This scheme may be used for scalable quantum computation and quantum communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The first experimental demonstration of DFS communication was reported in 2000 by Kwiat et al., where a controllable collective decoherence was induced on an entangled photon pair from spontaneous parametric down-conversion and one specific entangled state was observed to be immune to decoherence.
“The first experimental demonstration of DFS communication was reported in 2000 by Kwiat et al. [385], where the authors induced a controllable collective decoherence on an entangled photon pair generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion (PDC) and observing that, as predicted, one specific entangled state was immune to decoherence.”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [385]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring
Shor, P. W. (2002) · Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 · Cited by 8,713
Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing
Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (2014) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025 · Cited by 8,299
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
Kimble, H. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07127 · Cited by 6,023
Experimental quantum teleportation
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37539 · Cited by 5,545 · cited 2×
“In this case, we use four qubits (two atoms and two photons) rather than three, and our implementation is intrinsically probabilistic because the two–photon Bell states are not all deterministically distinguishable [149, 145, 65].”
MethodA single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 2×
“2), which proves quantum physics prohibits the cloning (copying) of an unknown quantum state [6].”
BackgroundQuantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733
Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J., & White, A. G. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052312 · Cited by 2,176 · cited 1×
“3 is obtained using a maximum likelihood method [147].”
MethodGottesman, D., & Chuang, I. L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46503 · Cited by 1,860
Boschi, D., Branca, S., De Martini, F., Hardy, L., & Popescu, S. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1121 · Cited by 1,777
Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer
Kielpinski, D., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00784 · Cited by 1,589
Self-citationExperimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions
Wineland, D. J., Monroe, C., Itano, W. M., Leibfried, D., King, B. E., & Meekhof, D. M. (1998) · Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · doi:10.6028/jres.103.019 · Cited by 1,497
Self-citationFrequency Ratio of Al+and Hg+Single-Ion Optical Clocks; Metrology at the 17th Decimal Place
Rosenband, T., Hume, D. B., Schmidt, P. O., Chou, C. W., Brusch, A., Lorini, L., Oskay, W. H., Drullinger, R. E., Fortier, T. M., Stalnaker, J. E., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154622 · Cited by 1,450 · cited 1×
“Since its introduction, the rf ion trap has been used for a wealth of applications, including atomic clocks, measurements of fundamental constants, mass and frequency spectroscopy [35, 36, 37, 38], and, of course, quantum information [9].”
MethodExperimental one-way quantum computing
Walther, P., Resch, K. J., Rudolph, T., Schenck, E., Weinfurter, H., Vedral, V., Aspelmeyer, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03347 · Cited by 1,273 · cited 1×
“Basic quantum operations applicable to the cluster-state model of quantum computation have been carried out using entangled photons [139, 140].”
Quantum Process Tomography of a Controlled-NOT Gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., Gilchrist, A., James, D. F. V., Langford, N. K., Ralph, T. C., & White, A. G. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.080502 · Cited by 499
Manipulation and detection of a trappedYb+hyperfine qubit
Olmschenk, S., Younge, K. C., Moehring, D. L., Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., & Monroe, C. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.052314 · Cited by 464
Self-citationBell Inequality Violation with Two Remote Atomic Qubits
Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., Moehring, D. L., Olmschenk, S., & Monroe, C. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.150404 · Cited by 392
Self-citationQuantum interference between two single photons emitted by independently trapped atoms
Beugnon, J., Jones, M. P. A., Dingjan, J., Darquié, B., Messin, G., Browaeys, A., & Grangier, P. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04628 · Cited by 324
Kiess, T. E., Shih, Y. H., Sergienko, A. V., & Alley, C. O. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.3893 · Cited by 263
Efficient Quantum Computation with Probabilistic Quantum Gates
Duan, L.-M., & Raussendorf, R. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.080503 · Cited by 185
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1126/science.282.5389.706 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature05136 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphys832 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35106500 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02570 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature02608 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1367-2630/9/7/211 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1259 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.052318 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.062324 · DOI
- R. Van Meter K. M. Itoh T. D. Ladd http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0507023. · arXiv
- 10.1038/nphys644 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature06118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.040505 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02377 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2921 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.R1727 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.110405 · DOI · Paper page
- J. B. Altepeter, E. R. Jeffrey, P. G. Kwiat, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, P. Berman, C. Lin, Eds. (Elsevier, San Diego, CA, 2006), vol. 52, pp. 105–159.
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1888 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08812 · Cited by 3,592
Self-citationRandom numbers certified by Bell’s theorem
Pironio, S., Acín, A., Massar, S., de la Giroday, A. B., Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., Olmschenk, S., Hayes, D., Luo, L., Manning, T. A., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09008 · Cited by 1,420
Self-citationPhotonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Single-Ion Atomic Clock with 3 × 10 − 18 Systematic Uncertainty
Huntemann, N., Sanner, C., Lipphardt, B., Tamm, C., & Peik, E. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.063001 · Cited by 677
Colloquium: Quantum networks with trapped ions
Duan, L.-M., & Monroe, C. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1209 · Cited by 530
Self-citationDevelopment of quantum interconnects (QuICs) for next-generation information technologies
Awschalom, D., Berggren, K. K., Bernien, H., Bhave, S., Carr, L. D., Davids, P., Economou, S. E., Englund, D., Faraon, A., Fejer, M., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.017002 · Cited by 392
Self-citationModular entanglement of atomic qubits using photons and phonons
Hucul, D., Inlek, I. V., Vittorini, G., Crocker, C., Debnath, S., Clark, S. M., & Monroe, C. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3150 · Cited by 311
Self-citationTunable ion–photon entanglement in an optical cavity
Stute, A., Casabone, B., Schindler, P., Monz, T., Schmidt, P. O., Brandstätter, B., Northup, T. E., & Blatt, R. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11120 · Cited by 243
Light-matter entanglement over 50 km of optical fibre
Krutyanskiy, V., Meraner, M., Schupp, J., Krcmarsky, V., Hainzer, H., & Lanyon, B. P. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0186-3 · Cited by 138
High-fidelity teleportation of a logical qubit using transversal gates and lattice surgery
Ryan-Anderson, C., Brown, N. C., Baldwin, C. H., Dreiling, J. M., Foltz, C., Gaebler, J. P., Gatterman, T. M., Hewitt, N., Holliman, C., Horst, C. V., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adp6016 · Cited by 52
Self-citationHyperfine and optical barium ion qubits
Dietrich, M. R., Kurz, N., Noel, T., Shu, G., & Blinov, B. B. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.052328 · Cited by 41
Robust and scalable scheme to generate large-scale entanglement webs
Fujii, K., Maeda, H., & Yamamoto, K. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.050303 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Olmschenk, S., Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., Hayes, D., Duan, L.-M., & Monroe, C.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2009-01-23
- Volume
- 323
- Issue
- 5913
- Pages
- 486-489
- ISSN
- 0036-8075
- 1095-9203
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 29
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
