Cited by 77Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum-Dot Cellular Automata

Five two-qubit gates are necessary for implementing the Toffoli gate

Open access
Yu, Nengkun, Duan, Runyao, Ying, Mingsheng·2013·Physical Review A

Abstract

In this Rapid Communication, we consider the open problem of the minimum cost of two-qubit gates for simulating the Toffoli gate and show that five two-qubit gates are necessary. Before our work, it was known that five two-qubit gates are sufficient to implement the Toffoli gate, and numerical evidence indicates that five two-qubit gates are also necessary. The idea introduced here can also be used to solve the problem of optimal simulation of Deutsch three-qubit gates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.88.010304

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Five two-qubit gates are necessary for 2-controlled phase shift gates.

    “Since 5 two-qubit gates are necessary for 2-controlled phase shift gates [62], this decomposition is essentially optimal.”

    From High-Round QAOA for MAX $k$-SAT on Trapped Ion NISQ Devices (2023) · cites this paper as [62]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. A. M. Childs et al., in Proceedings of the 35th ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC 2003) (ACM, New York, 2003), pp. 59-68.
  2. D. P. DiVincenzo and J. A. Smolin, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Physics and Computation: Physcomp '94 (Dallas, Texas, 1994).
  3. Y. Shi, Quantum Inf. Comput. 3, 1 (2003).
  4. G. Song and A. Klappenecker, Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 5 (2004).
  5. V. V. Shende and I. L. Markov, Quantum Inf. Comput. 9, 5 (2009).
  6. C. Moraga, Facta universitatis -series: Electronics and Energet- ics 2011, vol. 24, br. 3, str. 423-435.
  7. N. Yu and M. Ying, arXiv:1301.3727. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, N., Duan, R., & Ying, M.
Affiliations
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2013-07-30
Volume
88
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W1994839488
Cited by
77
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61179030)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Australian Research Council (DP120103776, FT120100449, DP110103473)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata
Keywords
Toffoli gate, two-qubit gates, gate decomposition, quantum circuit simulation, lower bounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review