The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving strongly correlated electron models on a quantum computer
Open accessAbstract
One of the main applications of future quantum computers will be the simulation of quantum models. While the evolution of a quantum state under a Hamiltonian is straightforward (if sometimes expensive), using quantum computers to determine the ground state phase diagram of a quantum model and the properties of its phases is more involved. Using the Hubbard model as a prototypical example, we here show all the steps necessary to determine its phase diagram and ground state properties on a quantum computer. In particular, we discuss strategies for efficiently determining and preparing the ground state of the Hubbard model starting from various mean-field states with broken symmetry. We present an efficient procedure to prepare arbitrary Slater determinants as initial states and present the complete set of quantum circuits needed to evolve from these to the ground state of the Hubbard model. We show that, using efficient nesting of the various terms each time step in the evolution can be performed with just $\mathcal{O}(N)$ gates and $\mathcal{O}(\log N)$ circuit depth. We give explicit circuits to measure arbitrary local observables and static and dynamic correlation functions, both in the time and frequency domain. We further present efficient non-destructive approaches to measurement that avoid the need to re-prepare the ground state after each measurement and that quadratically reduce the measurement error.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the long term, quantum simulation using quantum computers has great potential to wield a broad influence on the world [48, 49, 50].”
From Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond (2018) · cites this paper as [49]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“The cost of estimating the correct ground state energy depends directly on the overlap of the initial state with the ground state, and it becomes progressively more expensive as the overlap with the correct ground state decreases [20, 48–50].”
From Drug design on quantum computers (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“Even though the run-time has improved over time [48, 49], the dependence on the overlap of the initial and target states cannot be circumvented [50].”
From Drug design on quantum computers (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“Correspondingly, most of the experimental implementations so far have employed methods that better tolerate these fluctuations, such as Nelder-Mead and Particle-Swarm Optimization (PSO) 353 , which are gradient free. More recently the Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation (SPSA) has been applied 354,355 .”
From Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [354]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 · Cited by 8,436
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
The Resonating Valence Bond State in La 2 CuO 4 and Superconductivity
Anderson, P. W. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 · Cited by 7,666
Electron correlations in narrow energy bands
Hubbard, J. (1963) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1963.0204 · Cited by 6,687
Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?
Anderson, P. W. (1973) · Materials Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0025-5408(73)90167-0 · Cited by 2,852
Sachdev, S. (2011) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511973765 · Cited by 2,842
On the product of semi-groups of operators
Trotter, H. F. (1959) · Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1959-0108732-6 · Cited by 2,282
A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S., Lapan, J., Lundgren, A., & Preda, D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057726 · Cited by 2,056
Effect of Correlation on the Ferromagnetism of Transition Metals
Gutzwiller, M. C. (1963) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.10.159 · Cited by 1,905
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- M. B. Hastings, 2015, Quantum Inf. Comput., 15, 1
- D. Poulin, 2015, Quantum Inf. Comput., 15, 361
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
“ena where quantum computers seem to have a clear advantage over classical ones. In the long term, quantum simulation using quantum computers has great potential to wield a broad influence on the world [42, 43, 44]. Advances in quantum chemistry, facilitated by quantum computing, might precipitate the design of new phar…”
BackgroundQuantum computational chemistry
McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015003 · Cited by 1,621
Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J. P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P. D., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I. D., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N. P. D., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00803 · Cited by 1,560
Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J., Degroote, M., Johnson, P., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N., et al. (n.d.) · OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 1,265
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G. H., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 · Cited by 1,031
Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer
Collaborators, G. A. Q. A., Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Boixo, S., Broughton, M., Buckley, B. B., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb9811 · Cited by 870
Self-citationElucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers
Reiher, M., Wiebe, N., Svore, K. M., Wecker, D., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1619152114 · Cited by 745
Self-citationPractical quantum advantage in quantum simulation
Daley, A. J., Bloch, I., Kokail, C., Flannigan, S., Pearson, N., Troyer, M., & Zoller, P. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04940-6 · Cited by 783
Self-citationToward the first quantum simulation with quantum speedup
Childs, A. M., Maslov, D., Nam, Y., Ross, N. J., & Su, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1801723115 · Cited by 551
Theory of Trotter Error with Commutator Scaling
Childs, A. M., Su, Y., Tran, M. C., Wiebe, N., & Zhu, S. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.011020 · Cited by 646
Self-citationOpenFermion: the electronic structure package for quantum computers
McClean, J. R., Rubin, N. C., Sung, K. J., Kivlichan, I., Bonet-Monroig, X., Cao, Y., Dai, C., Fried, E., Gidney, C., Gimby, B., et al. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab8ebc · Cited by 621
Quantum Simulation of Electronic Structure with Linear Depth and Connectivity
Kivlichan, I. D., McClean, J., Wiebe, N., Gidney, C., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Chan, G. K.-L., & Babbush, R. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.110501 · Cited by 431
Self-citationThe Hubbard Model: A Computational Perspective
Qin, M., Schäfer, T., Andergassen, S., Corboz, P., & Gull, E. (2021) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-090921-033948 · Cited by 469
Encoding Electronic Spectra in Quantum Circuits with Linear T Complexity
Babbush, R., Gidney, C., Berry, D. W., Wiebe, N., McClean, J., Paler, A., Fowler, A., & Neven, H. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.041015 · Cited by 383
Self-citationA Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor
Moses, S. A., Baldwin, C. H., Allman, M. S., Ancona, R., Ascarrunz, L., Barnes, C., Bartolotta, J., Bjork, B., Blanchard, P., Bohn, M., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041052 · Cited by 391
Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics
Bauer, C., Davoudi, Z., Balantekin, A. B., Tanmoy Bhattacharya, A., Carena, M. S., de Jong, W. A., Draper, P., El-Khadra, A. X., Gemelke, N., Hanada, M., et al. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.027001 · Cited by 503
Self-citationQuantum Computer Systems for Scientific Discovery
Alexeev, Y., Bacon, D., Brown, K. R., Calderbank, R., Carr, L. D., Chong, F. T., DeMarco, B., Englund, D. R., Farhi, E., Fefferman, B., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.017001 · Cited by 339
Quantum computing enhanced computational catalysis
von Burg, V., Low, G. H., Häner, T., Steiger, D. S., Reiher, M., Roetteler, M., & Troyer, M. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033055 · Cited by 310
Self-citationQuantum computing enhanced computational catalysis
von Burg, V., Low, G. H., Häner, T., Steiger, D. S., Reiher, M., Roetteler, M., & Troyer, M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.14460 · Cited by 258
Self-citationHybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Correlated Materials
Bauer, B., Wecker, D., Millis, A. J., Hastings, M. B., & Troyer, M. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.031045 · Cited by 277
Self-citationQuantum Computer Systems for Scientific Discovery
Alexeev, Y., Bacon, D., Brown, K. R., Calderbank, R., Carr, L. D., Chong, F. T., DeMarco, B., Englund, D., Farhi, E., Fefferman, B., et al. (2021) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · doi:10.6082/h7fqg-6vt65 · Cited by 257
Quantum optical neural networks
Steinbrecher, G. R., Olson, J. P., Englund, D. R., & Carolan, J. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0174-7 · Cited by 226
Perspective on the Current State-of-the-Art of Quantum Computing for Drug Discovery Applications
Blunt, N. S., Camps, J., Crawford, O., Izsák, R., Leontica, S., Mirani, A., Moylett, A. E., Scivier, S. A., Sünderhauf, C., Schopf, P., et al. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00574 · Cited by 192
NISQ computing: where are we and where do we go?
Lau, J. W. Z., Lim, K. H., Shrotriya, H., & Kwek, L. C. (2022) · AAPPS bulletin · doi:10.1007/s43673-022-00058-z · Cited by 199
Low rank representations for quantum simulation of electronic structure
Motta, M., Ye, E., McClean, J. R., Li, Z., Minnich, A. J., Babbush, R., & Chan, G. K. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00416-z · Cited by 207
A software methodology for compiling quantum programs
Häner, T., Steiger, D. S., Svore, K. M., & Troyer, M. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aaa5cc · Cited by 171
Self-citationTapering off qubits to simulate fermionic HamiltoniansPreprint
Bravyi, S., Gambetta, J., Mezzacapo, A., & Temme, K. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.08213 · Cited by 356
Kivlichan, I. D., Gidney, C., Berry, D. W., Wiebe, N., McClean, J., Sun, W., Jiang, Z., Rubin, N., Fowler, A., Aspuru-Guzik, A., et al. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-07-16-296 · Cited by 173
Self-citationVariational quantum eigensolver with fewer qubits
Liu, J.-G., Zhang, Y.-H., Wan, Y., & Wang, L. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.023025 · Cited by 166
Standard model physics and the digital quantum revolution: thoughts about the interface
Klco, N., Roggero, A., & A, M. J. S. (2022) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac58a4 · Cited by 209
Sawaya, N. P. D., Menke, T., Kyaw, T. H., Johri, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Guerreschi, G. G. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0278-0 · Cited by 163
Quantum Algorithms to Simulate Many-Body Physics of Correlated Fermions
Jiang, Z., Sung, K. J., Kechedzhi, K., Smelyanskiy, V. N., & Boixo, S. (2018) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.9.044036 · Cited by 175
Quantum Algorithms for Simulating the Lattice Schwinger Model
Shaw, A. F., Lougovski, P., Stryker, J. R., & Wiebe, N. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-08-10-306 · Cited by 179
Self-citationExact Ising model simulation on a quantum computer
Cervera-Lierta, A. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-12-21-114 · Cited by 157
Fermionic Partial Tomography via Classical Shadows
Zhao, A., Rubin, N. C., & Miyake, A. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.110504 · Cited by 169
Drug design on quantum computers
(2024) · doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02411-5 · Cited by 132
Self-citationAdaptive Variational Quantum Dynamics Simulations
Yao, Y.-X., Gomes, N., Zhang, F., Wang, C.-Z., Ho, K.-M., Iadecola, T., & Orth, P. P. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030307 · Cited by 152
Electron-Phonon Systems on a Universal Quantum Computer
Macridin, A., Spentzouris, P., Amundson, J. F., & Harnik, R. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.110504 · Cited by 120
Quantum Computing and Simulations for Energy Applications: Review and Perspective
Paudel, H. P., Syamlal, M., Crawford, S. E., Lee, Y., Shugayev, R., Lu, P., Ohodnicki, P. R., Mollot, D., & Duan, Y. (2022) · ACS Engineering Au · doi:10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00033 · Cited by 153
Low-depth circuit ansatz for preparing correlated fermionic states on a quantum computer
Dallaire-Demers, P.-L., Romero, J., Veis, L., Sim, S., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab3951 · Cited by 119
qHiPSTER: The Quantum High Performance Software Testing EnvironmentPreprint
Smelyanskiy, M., Sawaya, N. P. D., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1601.07195 · Cited by 218
Measuring the Rényi entropy of a two-site Fermi-Hubbard model on a trapped ion quantum computer
Linke, N. M., Johri, S., Figgatt, C., Landsman, K. A., Matsuura, A. Y., & Monroe, C. R. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052334 · Cited by 115
Quantum Algorithm for Spectral Measurement with a Lower Gate Count
Poulin, D., Kitaev, A., Steiger, D. S., Hastings, M. B., & Troyer, M. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.010501 · Cited by 108
Self-citationQuantum Power Method by a Superposition of Time-Evolved States
Seki, K., & Yunoki, S. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010333 · Cited by 109
Adaptive Variational Quantum Dynamics Simulations
Yao, Y., Gomes, N., Zhang, F., Wang, C., Ho, K., Iadecola, T., & Orth, P. P. (2021) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · Cited by 104
Calculating energy derivatives for quantum chemistry on a quantum computer
O’Brien, T. E., Senjean, B., Sagastizabal, R., Bonet-Monroig, X., Dutkiewicz, A., Buda, F., DiCarlo, L., & Visscher, L. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0213-4 · Cited by 108
Many-Body Physics in the NISQ Era: Quantum Programming a Discrete Time Crystal
Ippoliti, M., Kechedzhi, K., Moessner, R., Sondhi, S. L., & Khemani, V. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030346 · Cited by 105
Stanisic, S., Bosse, J. L., Gambetta, F. M., Santos, R. A., Mruczkiewicz, W., O’Brien, T. E., Ostby, E. P., & Montanaro, A. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33335-4 · Cited by 97
Jastrow-type Decomposition in Quantum Chemistry for Low-Depth Quantum Circuits
Matsuzawa, Y., & Kurashige, Y. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00963 · Cited by 104
Operator locality in the quantum simulation of fermionic models
Havlíček, V., Troyer, M., & Whitfield, J. D. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.032332 · Cited by 92
Self-citationLocal, expressive, quantum-number-preserving VQE ansätze for fermionic systems
Anselmetti, G.-L., Wierichs, D., Gogolin, C., & Parrish, R. M. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac2cb3 · Cited by 123
Calculation of the Green's function on near-term quantum computers
Endo, S., Kurata, I., & Nakagawa, Y. O. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033281 · Cited by 106
Quantum computing for neutrino-nucleus scattering
Roggero, A., Li, A. C. Y., Carlson, J., Gupta, R., & Perdue, G. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.074038 · Cited by 103
Digital quantum computation of fermion-boson interacting systems
Macridin, A., Spentzouris, P., Amundson, J. F., & Harnik, R. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.042312 · Cited by 94
Complexity of Quantum Impurity Problems
Bravyi, S., & Gosset, D. (2017) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2976-9 · Cited by 106
Quantum-optimal-control-inspired ansatz for variational quantum algorithms
Choquette, A., Di Paolo, A., Barkoutsos, P. K., Sénéchal, D., Tavernelli, I., & Blais, A. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023092 · Cited by 86
Babbush, R., Berry, D. W., Sanders, Y. R., Kivlichan, I., Scherer, A., Wei, A. Y., Love, P. J., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa9463 · Cited by 85
Jiang, Z., Kalev, A., Mruczkiewicz, W., & Neven, H. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-06-04-276 · Cited by 110
Simulating quantum materials with digital quantum computers
Oftelie, L. B., Urbánek, M., Metcalf, M., Carter, J. T., Kemper, A. F., & de Jong, W. A. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac1ca6 · Cited by 83
Resource Estimation for Quantum Variational Simulations of the Hubbard Model
Cai, Z. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.014059 · Cited by 78
NISQ Computers: A Path to Quantum Supremacy
AbuGhanem, M., & Eleuch, H. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3432330 · Cited by 94
Observation of separated dynamics of charge and spin in the Fermi-Hubbard modelPreprint
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Bengtsson, A., Boixo, S., Broughton, M., Buckley, B. B., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.07965 · Cited by 201
Local spin operators for fermion simulations
Whitfield, J. D., Havlíček, V., & Troyer, M. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.030301 · Cited by 70
Self-citationQuantum Filter Diagonalization with Compressed Double-Factorized Hamiltonians
Cohn, J., Motta, M., & Parrish, R. M. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040352 · Cited by 85
Toward scalable simulations of lattice gauge theories on quantum computers
Mathis, S. V., Mazzola, G., & Tavernelli, I. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.094501 · Cited by 65
Entanglement spectroscopy on a quantum computer
Johri, S., Steiger, D. S., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.195136 · Cited by 65
Self-citationTime-dependent unbounded Hamiltonian simulation with vector norm scaling
An, D., Fang, D., & Lin, L. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-05-26-459 · Cited by 64
Quantum embedding theories to simulate condensed systems on quantum computers
Vorwerk, C., Sheng, N., Govoni, M., Huang, B., & Galli, G. (2022) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-022-00279-0 · Cited by 73
Generalization despite overfitting in quantum machine learning models
Peters, E., & Schuld, M. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-12-20-1210 · Cited by 95
Time-marching based quantum solvers for time-dependent linear differential equations
Fang, D., Lin, L., & Tong, Y. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-03-20-955 · Cited by 91
Majorana Loop Stabilizer Codes for Error Mitigation in Fermionic Quantum Simulations
Zhang, J., McClean, J. R., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2019) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.12.064041 · Cited by 64
Nearly tight Trotterization of interacting electrons
Su, Y., Huang, H.-Y., & Campbell, E. T. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-07-05-495 · Cited by 79
AFS: Accurate, Fast, and Scalable Error-Decoding for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers
Das, P., Pattison, C. A., Manne, S., Carmean, D. M., Svore, K. M., Qureshi, M. K., & Delfosse, N. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca53966.2022.00027 · Cited by 74
Quantum codes for quantum simulation of fermions on a square lattice of qubits
Steudtner, M., & Wehner, S. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022308 · Cited by 62
Quantum inverse iteration algorithm for programmable quantum simulators
Kyriienko, O. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0239-7 · Cited by 66
A Leap among Quantum Computing and Quantum Neural Networks: A Survey
Massoli, F. V., Vadicamo, L., Amato, G. M., & Falchi, F. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3529756 · Cited by 78
Simulating key properties of lithium-ion batteries with a fault-tolerant quantum computer
Delgado, A., Casares, P. A. M., dos Reis, R., Zini, M. S., Campos, R., Hernández, N. C., Voigt, A.-C., Lowe, A., Jahangiri, S., Martin-Delgado, M. A., et al. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.032428 · Cited by 71
Boundaries of quantum supremacy via random circuit sampling
Zlokapa, A., Villalonga, B., Boixo, S., & Lidar, D. A. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00703-x · Cited by 66
Optimizing quantum phase estimation for the simulation of Hamiltonian eigenstates
Cruz, P. M. Q., Catarina, G., Gautier, R., & Fernández-Rossier, J. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abaa2c · Cited by 53
Robust quantum compilation and circuit optimisation via energy minimisation
Jones, T., & Benjamin, S. C. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-01-24-628 · Cited by 84
LILLIPUT: a lightweight low-latency lookup-table decoder for near-term Quantum error correction
Das, P., Locharla, A., & Jones, C. (2022) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) · doi:10.1145/3503222.3507707 · Cited by 84
Davoudi, Z., Shaw, A. F., & Stryker, J. R. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-12-20-1213 · Cited by 92
Variational Quantum Simulation for Quantum Chemistry
Li, Y., Hu, J., Zhang, X., Song, Z., & Yung, M. (2019) · Advanced Theory and Simulations · doi:10.1002/adts.201800182 · Cited by 56
Quantum computing with and for many-body physics
Ayral, T., Besserve, P., Denis Lacroix, A., & Guzman, E. A. R. (2023) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01141-1 · Cited by 71
QVECTOR: an algorithm for device-tailored quantum error correction
Johnson, P. D., Romero, J., Olson, J., Cao, Y., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.02249 · Cited by 50
Nonequilibrium quantum impurity problems via matrix-product states in the temporal domain
Thoenniss, J., Lerose, A., & Abanin, D. A. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.195101 · Cited by 54
Floquet Quantum Simulation with Superconducting Qubits
Kyriienko, O., & Sørensen, A. S. (2018) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.9.064029 · Cited by 48
Quantum-classical simulation of two-site dynamical mean-field theory on noisy quantum hardware
Keen, T., Maier, T., Johnston, S., & Lougovski, P. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab7d4c · Cited by 56
Hybridized Methods for Quantum Simulation in the Interaction Picture
Rajput, A., Roggero, A., & Wiebe, N. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-08-17-780 · Cited by 62
Self-citationHamiltonian Simulation with Random Inputs
Zhao, Q., Zhou, Y., Shaw, A. F., Li, T., & Childs, A. M. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.270502 · Cited by 48
Near- and long-term quantum algorithmic approaches for vibrational spectroscopy
Sawaya, N. P. D., Paesani, F., & Tabor, D. P. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.062419 · Cited by 54
Nearly tight Trotterization of interacting electrons
Su, Y., Huang, H.-Y., & Campbell, E. T. (2020) · CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) · Cited by 49
Dynamical mean field theory algorithm and experiment on quantum computersPreprint
Rungger, I., Fitzpatrick, N., Chen, H., Alderete, C. H., Apel, H., Cowtan, A., Patterson, A., Ramo, D. M., Zhu, Y., Nguyen, N. H., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.04735 · Cited by 73
Reliability Modeling of NISQ- Era Quantum Computers
Liu, J., & Zhou, H. (2020) · IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization · doi:10.1109/iiswc50251.2020.00018 · Cited by 47
Quantum Hamiltonian-Based Models and the Variational Quantum Thermalizer Algorithm
Verdon, G., Marks, J., Nanda, S., Leichenauer, S., & Hidary, J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.02071 · Cited by 45
Qubit-efficient encoding scheme for quantum simulations of electronic structure
Shee, Y., Tsai, P.-K., Hong, C.-L., Cheng, H., & Goan, H. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023154 · Cited by 53
Kreula, J. M., Clark, S. R., & Jaksch, D. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep32940 · Cited by 52
Programming quantum computers using design automation
Soeken, M., Häner, T., & Roetteler, M. (2018) · Design, Automation, and Test in Europe · doi:10.23919/date.2018.8341993 · Cited by 49
Autonomous Tuning and Charge-State Detection of Gate-Defined Quantum Dots
Darulová, J., Pauka, S., Wiebe, N., Chan, K. W., Gardener, G. C., Manfra, M. J., Cassidy, M. C., & Troyer, M. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.13.054005 · Cited by 46
Self-citationNonunitary Operations for Ground-State Calculations in Near-Term Quantum Computers
Mazzola, G., Ollitrault, P. J., Barkoutsos, P. K., & Tavernelli, I. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.130501 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Wecker, D., Hastings, M. B., Wiebe, N., Clark, B. K., Nayak, C., & Troyer, M.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2015-12-10
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2167110831
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1066293)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- European Research Council (SIMCOFE)
- Aspen Center for Physics
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Keywords
- Hubbard model, strongly correlated electrons, quantum simulation, ground state preparation, phase diagram, Slater determinants, quantum circuits, circuit depth, correlation functions, non-destructive measurement, measurement error reduction, quantum computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
