CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protecting the entanglement of twisted photons by adaptive optics

Leonhard, Nina, Sorelli, Giacomo, Shatokhin, Vyacheslav N., Reinlein, Claudia, Buchleitner, Andreas·2018·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.97.012321
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.97.012321

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alignment-free OAM states have unlocked advancements in free-space quantum key distribution and quantum communication with high bit exchange rates.

    “These features have unlocked a number of advancements in free-space quantum key distribution and quantum communication [67,81,86,[96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103] with high bit exchange rates [104,105].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Introduction discusses OAM states in free-space quantum cryptography and reports prior quantum key distribution and entanglement distribution; the Conclusion suggests adaptive optics could improve OAM-based quantum communication. Neither section describes the states as alignment-free or establishes that they unlocked the claimed advancements. The high-bit-exchange-rate phrase has its own citations [104,105], so it is not attributed to this source by the printed sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nphys607 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.1402365111 · DOI
  4. 2012, The Angular Momentum of Light
  5. 10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/033033 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3313 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012306 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.153901 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1612023113 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.060503 · DOI
  11. 10.1364/OPTICA.4.001006 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1073/pnas.1517574112 · DOI
  13. 10.1088/2040-8978/19/1/013001 · DOI
  14. 10.1119/1.19310 · DOI
  15. R. Tyson, 2011, Principles of Adaptive Optics
  16. 10.1364/OL.39.002845 · DOI
  17. 10.1364/OPTICA.1.000376 · DOI
  18. 10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033020 · DOI
  19. 10.1364/OE.22.031337 · DOI
  20. 10.1088/1367-2630/9/4/094 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1364/OE.19.006671 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.012312 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.012345 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.012326 · DOI
  25. 10.1088/1751-8113/47/19/195302 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245 · DOI · Paper page
  27. L. C. Andrews, 2005, Laser Beam Propagation through Random Media, 10.1117/3.626196 · DOI
  28. J. D. Schmidt, 2010, Numerical Simulation of Optical Wave Propagation with Examples in MATLAB, 10.1117/3.866274 · DOI
  29. 10.1364/AO.41.004897 · DOI
  30. 10.1088/0959-7174/2/3/003 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s10946-015-9540-x · DOI
  32. 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1364/AO.47.002414 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1117/1.OE.55.11.111611 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.210503 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leonhard, N., Sorelli, G., Shatokhin, V. N., Reinlein, C., & Buchleitner, A.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
97
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
DOI
10.1103/physreva.97.012321
Cited by
41
References
2
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BU 1337/17-1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review