Cited by 55Terahertz technology and applicationsLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

Theory of coherent-oscillations generation in terahertz pump-probe spectroscopy: From phonons to electronic collective modes

Open access
Udina, Mattia, Cea, Tommaso, Benfatto, Lara·2019·Physical Review B

Abstract

Time-resolved spectroscopies using intense THz pulses appear as a promising tool to address collective electronic excitations in condensed matter. In particular, recent experiments showed the possibility to selectively excite collective modes emerging across a phase transition, as is the case for superconducting and charge-density-wave (CDW) systems. One possible signature of these excitations is the emergence of coherent oscillations of the differential probe field in pump-probe protocols. While the analogy with the case of phonon modes suggests that the basic underlying mechanism should be a sum-frequency stimulated Raman process, a general theoretical scheme able to describe the experiments and to define the relevant optical quantity is still lacking. Here we provide this scheme by showing that coherent oscillations as a function of the pump-probe time delay can be linked to the convolution in the frequency domain between the squared pump field and a Raman-like nonlinear optical kernel. This approach is applied and discussed in a few paradigmatic examples: ordinary phonons in an insulator, and collective charge and Higgs fluctuations across a superconducting and a CDW transition. Our results not only account very well for the existing experimental data in a wide variety of systems, but they also offer a useful perspective to design future experiments in emerging materials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.100.165131

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two peaks of comparable amplitudes are expected when accounting for the electronic nonlinear response associated with χ(3), namely the third-order susceptibility tensor.

    “Two peaks of comparable amplitudes are, on the other hand, expected when accounting for the electronic nonlinear response associated with χ(3), namely the third-order susceptibility tensor22.”

    From Terahertz electric-field-driven dynamical multiferroicity in SrTiO3 (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    Section I (page unavailable) describes the nonlinear electronic current as controlled by a third-order tensor, supporting the χ(3) characterization. It also identifies peaks in the squared pump-field spectrum, but does not predict that two peaks in the electronic nonlinear response have comparable amplitudes; their response depends on the nonlinear kernel and resonance conditions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [9]9. R. Shimano and N. Tsuji, Higgs mode in superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, doi: 10.1146/annurev- conmatphys-031119-050813. · DOI
  2. [18]18. A. F. Volkov and S. M. Kogan, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 65, 2038 (1973) [Sov. Phys. JETP 38, 1018 (1974)].
  3. [29]29. B. Fauseweh, and L Schwarz, N. Tsuji, N. Cheng, N. Bittner, H. Krull, M. Berciu, G. S. Uhrig, A. P. Schnyder, S. Kaiser, and D. Manske, arXiv:1712.07989. · arXiv
  4. [30]30. A. Kumar and A. F. Kemper, arXiv:1902.09549. · arXiv
  5. [36]36. H. Chiu et al., arXiv:1901.06675. · arXiv
  6. [77]77. Ho, Dy, Tb), Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 246402 (2008).
  7. [78]78. T. Cea, C. Castellani, G. Seibold, and L. Benfatto, Nonrelativis- tic Dynamics of the Amplitude (Higgs) Mode in Superconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 157002 (2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Udina, M., Cea, T., & Benfatto, L.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • IMDEA Nanoscience (ES)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2019-10-17
Volume
100
Issue
16
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W2961109485
Cited by
55
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale (PGR04879)
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (PRIN 2017Z8TS5B)
  • European Commission (CNECTICT-604391)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Keywords
coherent oscillations, collective electronic excitations, phonons, superconducting transition, charge-density-wave transition, charge fluctuations, phase transitions, time-resolved spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review