Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Self-consistency and sum-rule tests in the Kramers-Kronig analysis of optical data: Applications to aluminum

Shiles, E., Sasaki, Taizo, Inokuti, Mitio, Smith, D. Y.·1980·Physical Review B

Abstract

An iterative, self-consistent procedure for the Kramers-Kronig analysis of data from reflectance, ellipsometric, transmission, and electron-energy-loss measurements is presented. This procedure has been developed for practical dispersion analysis since experimentally no single optical function can be readily measured over the entire range of frequencies as required by the Kramers-Kronig relations. The present technique is applied to metallic aluminum as an example. The results are then examined for internal consistency and for systematic errors by various optical sum rules. The latter provide tests of agreement with both theoretical constraints and independently measured properties such as electron density, dc conductivity, and stopping power. The present procedure affords a systematic means of preparing a self-consistent set of optical functions provided some optical or energy-loss data are available in all important spectral regions. The analysis of aluminum discloses that currently available data exhibit an excess oscillator strength, apparently in the vicinity of the $L$ edge. A possible explanation is a systematic experimental error in the absorption-coefficient measurements resulting from surface layers---possibly oxides---present in thinfilm transmission samples. A revised set of optical functions has been prepared by an ad hoc reduction of the reported absorption coefficient above the $L$ edge by 14%. These revised data lead to a total oscillator strength consistent with the known electron density and are in agreement with dc-conductivity and stopping-power measurements as well as with absorption coefficients inferred from the cross sections of neighboring elements in the periodic table. The optical functions resulting from this study show evidence for both the redistribution of oscillator strength between energy levels and the effects on real transitions of the shielding of conduction electrons by virtual processes in the core states.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.22.1612

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Shiles, E., Sasaki, T., Inokuti, M., & Smith, D. Y.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1980-08-15
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
1612-1628
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063765012
Cited by
420
References
0
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-consistency and sum-rule tests in the Kramers-Kronig analysis of optical data: Applications to aluminum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.22.1612
The paper
Shiles, E., Sasaki, T., Inokuti, M., & Smith, D. Y. (1980). Self-consistency and sum-rule tests in the Kramers-Kronig analysis of optical data: Applications to aluminum. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.22.1612

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.