The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-consistency and sum-rule tests in the Kramers-Kronig analysis of optical data: Applications to aluminum
Abstract
An iterative, self-consistent procedure for the Kramers-Kronig analysis of data from reflectance, ellipsometric, transmission, and electron-energy-loss measurements is presented. This procedure has been developed for practical dispersion analysis since experimentally no single optical function can be readily measured over the entire range of frequencies as required by the Kramers-Kronig relations. The present technique is applied to metallic aluminum as an example. The results are then examined for internal consistency and for systematic errors by various optical sum rules. The latter provide tests of agreement with both theoretical constraints and independently measured properties such as electron density, dc conductivity, and stopping power. The present procedure affords a systematic means of preparing a self-consistent set of optical functions provided some optical or energy-loss data are available in all important spectral regions. The analysis of aluminum discloses that currently available data exhibit an excess oscillator strength, apparently in the vicinity of the $L$ edge. A possible explanation is a systematic experimental error in the absorption-coefficient measurements resulting from surface layers---possibly oxides---present in thinfilm transmission samples. A revised set of optical functions has been prepared by an ad hoc reduction of the reported absorption coefficient above the $L$ edge by 14%. These revised data lead to a total oscillator strength consistent with the known electron density and are in agreement with dc-conductivity and stopping-power measurements as well as with absorption coefficients inferred from the cross sections of neighboring elements in the periodic table. The optical functions resulting from this study show evidence for both the redistribution of oscillator strength between energy levels and the effects on real transitions of the shielding of conduction electrons by virtual processes in the core states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Straggling in thin silicon detectors
Bichsel, H. (1988) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.60.663 · Cited by 402
Self-consistent optical constants of SiO_2 and Ta_2O_5 films
Rodríguez-de Marcos, L. V., Larruquert, J. I., Méndez, J. A., & Aznárez, J. A. (2016) · Optical Materials Express · doi:10.1364/ome.6.003622 · Cited by 323
Electron inelastic-scattering cross sections in liquid water
Dingfelder, M., Hantke, D., Inokuti, M., & Paretzke, H. G. (1998) · Radiation Physics and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0969-806x(97)00317-4 · Cited by 302
Self-citationElastic scattering of γ-rays and X-rays by atoms
Kane, P. P., Kissel, L., Pratt, R. H., & Roy, S. C. (1986) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(86)90018-9 · Cited by 267
Ding, Z. ‐., & Shimizu, R. (1996) · Scanning · doi:10.1002/sca.1996.4950180204 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Shiles, E., Sasaki, T., Inokuti, M., & Smith, D. Y.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1980-08-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1612-1628
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063765012
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-consistency and sum-rule tests in the Kramers-Kronig analysis of optical data: Applications to aluminum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.22.1612
- The paper
- Shiles, E., Sasaki, T., Inokuti, M., & Smith, D. Y. (1980). Self-consistency and sum-rule tests in the Kramers-Kronig analysis of optical data: Applications to aluminum. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.22.1612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.