Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electron mobility in modulation-doped heterostructures

Walukiewicz, W., Ruda, H. E., Lagowski, J., Gatos, H. C.·1984·Physical Review B

Abstract

A model for electron mobility in a two-dimensional electron gas confined in a triangular well was developed. All major scattering processes---i.e., deformation potential and piezoelectric acoustic, polar optical, ionized impurity, and alloy disorder---were included as well as intrasubband and intersubband scattering. The model is applied to two types of modulation-doped heterostructures, namely GaAs-GaAlAs and ${\mathrm{In}}_{0.53}$${\mathrm{Ga}}_{0.47}$As-${\mathrm{Al}}_{0.52}$${\mathrm{In}}_{0.48}$As. In the former case phonons and remote ionized impurities ultimately limit the mobility, whereas in the latter, alloy disorder is a predominant scattering process at low temperatures. The calculated mobilities are in very good agreement with recently reported experimental characteristics for both GaAs-${\mathrm{Ga}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Al}}_{x}\mathrm{As}$ and ${\mathrm{In}}_{0.53}$${\mathrm{Ga}}_{0.47}$As-${\mathrm{Al}}_{0.52}$${\mathrm{In}}_{0.48}$As modulation-doped heterostructures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.30.4571

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Walukiewicz, W., Ruda, H. E., Lagowski, J., & Gatos, H. C.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1984-10-15
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
4571-4582
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010868059
Cited by
447
References
19
FWCI
16.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.