Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Native defects in gallium nitride

Bogusl/awski, P., Briggs, E. L., Bernholc, J.·1995·Physical Review B

Abstract

The results of an extensive theoretical study of native defects in hexagonal GaN are presented. We have considered cation and anion vacancies, antisites, and interstitials. The computations were carried out using ab initio molecular dynamics in supercells containing 72 atoms. N vacancy introduces a shallow donor level, and may be responsible for the n-type character of as-grown GaN. Due to the wide gap of nitrides, self-compensation effects strongly reduce both n-type and p-type doping efficiencies due to the formation of gallium vacancy and interstitial Ga, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.51.17255

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Bogusl/awski, P., Briggs, E. L., & Bernholc, J.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1995-06-15
Volume
51
Issue
23
Pages
17255-17258
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W1974463941
Cited by
469
References
7
FWCI
13.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Native defects in gallium nitride. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.51.17255
The paper
Bogusl/awski, P., Briggs, E. L., & Bernholc, J. (1995). Native defects in gallium nitride. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.51.17255

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.