Cited by 188Metamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchNonlinear Optical Materials Research

Origin of second-harmonic generation enhancement in optical split-ring resonators

Open access
Ciracì, Cristian, Poutrina, Ekaterina, Scalora, Michael, Smith, David R.·2012·Physical Review B

Abstract

We present a study of the second-order nonlinear optical properties of metal-based metamaterials. A hydrodynamic model for electronic response is used, in which nonlinear surface contributions are expressed in terms of the bulk polarization. The model is in good agreement with published experimental results, and clarifies the mechanisms contributing to the nonlinear response. In particular, we show that the reported enhancement of the second harmonic in split-ring resonator based media is driven by the electric rather than the magnetic properties of the structure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.85.201403

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A hydrodynamic model for the electronic response in nanoplasmonic split-ring resonators explains the generation of THz radiation via optical rectification.

    “This behavior can be understood by a hydrodynamic model for the electronic response in nanoplasmonic SRRs, which was introduced first for interpreting second harmonic generation205 and then the generation of THz radiation via optical rectification200.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ciracì, C., Poutrina, E., Scalora, M., & Smith, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (US)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2012-05-15
Volume
85
Issue
20
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2078558572
Cited by
188
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Nonlinear Optical Materials Research
Keywords
second harmonic generation, split ring resonator, optical metamaterials, nonlinear optics, hydrodynamic model, bulk polarization, electric dipole response, magnetic response, nonlinear enhancement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review