Cited by 756Thermal properties of materialsThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic PhenomenaAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices

Four-phonon scattering significantly reduces intrinsic thermal conductivity of solids

Open access
Feng, Tianli, Lindsay, Lucas, Ruan, Xiulin·2017·Physical Review B

Abstract

For decades, the three-phonon scattering process has been considered to govern thermal transport in solids, while the role of higher-order four-phonon scattering has been persistently unclear and so ignored. However, recent quantitative calculations of three-phonon scattering have often shown a significant overestimation of thermal conductivity as compared to experimental values. In this Rapid Communication we show that four-phonon scattering is generally important in solids and can remedy such discrepancies. For silicon and diamond, the predicted thermal conductivity is reduced by 30% at 1000 K after including four-phonon scattering, bringing predictions in excellent agreement with measurements. For the projected ultrahigh-thermal conductivity material, zinc-blende BAs, a competitor of diamond as a heat sink material, four-phonon scattering is found to be strikingly strong as three-phonon processes have an extremely limited phase space for scattering. The four-phonon scattering reduces the predicted thermal conductivity from 2200 to 1400 W/m K at room temperature. The reduction at 1000 K is 60%. We also find that optical phonon scattering rates are largely affected, being important in applications such as phonon bottlenecks in equilibrating electronic excitations. Recognizing that four-phonon scattering is expensive to calculate, in the end we provide some guidelines on how to quickly assess the significance of four-phonon scattering, based on energy surface anharmonicity and the scattering phase space. Our work clears the decades-long fundamental question of the significance of higher-order scattering, and points out ways to improve thermoelectrics, thermal barrier coatings, nuclear materials, and radiative heat transfer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.96.161201

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent advances in atomistic simulations have enabled the calculations of phonon properties including phonon dispersions and phonon lifetimes with good accuracy, even without input parameters.

    “Recent advances in atomistic simulations have enabled the calculations of phonon properties including phonon dispersions and phonon lifetimes with good accuracy, even without input parameters. 196-200”

    From Tutorial: Time-domain thermoreflectance (TDTR) for thermal property characterization of bulk and thin film materials (2018) · cites this paper as [200]

    The paper’s Abstract (page not provided) reports first-principles calculations of phonon scattering rates and optical phonon lifetimes for BAs, Si, and diamond. Our copy does not establish accurate calculation of phonon dispersions or validate the calculated lifetimes against measurements, so those parts of the broader claim are not supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. D. A. Broido, M. Malorny, G. Birner, N. Mingo, and D. A. Stewart, Applied Physics Letters 91, 231922 (2007), ISSN 00036951, URL http://aip.scitation.org/doi/ 10.1063/1.2822891. · DOI · Paper page
  2. L. Lindsay, D. A. Broido, and T. L. Reinecke, Physical Review Letters 111, 025901 (2013), ISSN 0031-9007, URL http:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.025901. · DOI
  3. A. Seko, A. Togo, H. Hayashi, K. Tsuda, L. Chaput, and I. Tanaka, Physical Review Letters 115, 205901 (2015), ISSN 0031-9007, 1506.06439, URL http://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.205901. · DOI
  4. M. Novikov, T. Ositinskaya, O. Shulzhenko, O. Podoba, O. Sokolov, and I. Petrusha, Dopovidi Akademii Nauk Ukrain- skoi Rsr Seriya A-Fiziko-Matematichni Ta Technichni Nauki pp. 72-75 (1983).
  5. L.-D. Zhao, S.-H. Lo, Y. Zhang, H. Sun, G. Tan, C. Uher, C. Wolverton, V. P. Dravid, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Nature 508, 373 (2014).
  6. R. Guo, X. Wang, Y. Kuang, and B. Huang, Physical Review B 92, 115202 (2015).
  7. H. Ma, C. Li, S. Tang, J. Yan, A. Alatas, L. Lindsay, B. C. Sales, and Z. Tian, Physical Review B 94, 220303 (2016), ISSN 2469-9950, URL http://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.220303. · DOI
  8. J. Kim, D. A. Evans, D. P. Sellan, O. M. Williams, E. Ou, A. H. Cowley, and L. Shi, Applied Physics Letters 108 (2016), ISSN 00036951, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4950970. · DOI
  9. T. Feng and X. Ruan, Physical Review B 93, 045202 (2016), ISSN 2469-9950, URL http://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.045202. · DOI
  10. A. Maradudin and A. Fein, Physical Review 128, 2589 (1962), URL http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v128/ i6/p2589_1.
  11. H. Bao, B. Qiu, Y. Zhang, and X. Ruan, Journal of Quanti- tative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 113, 1683 (2012), ISSN 00224073, URL http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0022407312002336.
  12. S. I. Kim, K. H. Lee, H. a. Mun, H. S. Kim, S. W. Hwang, J. W. Roh, D. J. Yang, W. H. Shin, X. S. Li, Y. H. Lee, et al., Science 348, 109 (2015), ISSN 0036-8075, URL http://science. sciencemag.org/content/348/6230/109.
  13. M. Hong, T. C. Chasapis, Z.-G. Chen, L. Yang, M. G. Kanatzidis, G. J. Snyder, and J. Zou, ACS Nano 10, 4719 (2016), ISSN 1936-0851.
  14. A. Debernardi, Phys. Rev. B 57, 12847 (1998), URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.12847. · DOI
  15. L. Lindsay, D. Broido, and N. Mingo, Physical Review B 80, 125407 (2009), ISSN 1098-0121, URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.125407. · DOI
  16. S.-i. Tamura, Physical Review B 27, 858 (1983), URL http://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevB.27.858. · DOI
  17. T. Ruf, R. Henn, M. Asen-Palmer, E. Gmelin, M. Cardona, H.-J. Pohl, G. Devyatych, and P. Sennikov, Solid State Communica- tions 115, 243 (2000).
  18. B. Abeles, D. Beers, G. Cody, and J. Dismukes, Physical re- view 125, 44 (1962), URL https://journals.aps.org/pr/ abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.125.44. · DOI
  19. C. J. Glassbrenner and G. A. Slack, Physical Review 134, A1058 (1964), URL http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v134/ i4A/pA1058_1.
  20. L. Wei, P. K. Kuo, R. L. Thomas, T. R. Anthony, and W. F. Banholzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3764 (1993), URL https:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3764. · DOI
  21. D. G. Onn, A. Witek, Y. Z. Qiu, T. R. Anthony, and W. F. Banholzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2806 (1992), URL https:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2806. · DOI
  22. J. R. Olson, R. O. Pohl, J. W. Vandersande, A. Zoltan, T. R. Anthony, and W. F. Banholzer, Phys. Rev. B 47, 14850 (1993), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.47.14850. · DOI
  23. R. Berman, P. R. W. Hudson, and M. Martinez, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 8, L430 (1975), URL http: //stacks.iop.org/0022-3719/8/i=21/a=003.
  24. S.-Y. Yue, X. Zhang, G. Qin, S. R. Phillpot, and M. Hu, Phys. Rev. B 95, 195203 (2017), URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.195203. · DOI
  25. G. A. Slack and P. Andersson, Physical Review B 26, 1873 (1982).
  26. S. Mukhopadhyay, D. Bansal, O. Delaire, D. Perrodin, E. Bourret-Courchesne, D. J. Singh, and L. Lindsay, Physical Review B 96, 100301 (2017).
  27. L. Lindsay, D. A. Broido, and T. L. Reinecke, Physical Review B 88, 144306 (2013).

Authors
Feng, T., Lindsay, L., & Ruan, X.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2017-10-27
Volume
96
Issue
16
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W2765499981
Cited by
756
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 117 · 2025: 158 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 37
FWCI
15.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011-15-2-0037)
  • National Science Foundation (1150948)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Office of Science
  • Basic Energy Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Keywords
four-phonon scattering, thermal conductivity, three-phonon scattering, silicon, diamond, optical phonon scattering, phonon bottleneck, anharmonicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review