Cited by 733Thermal properties of materialsAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies

Measuring Thermal and Thermoelectric Properties of One-Dimensional Nanostructures Using a Microfabricated Device

Shi, Li, Li, Deyu, Yu, Choongho, Jang, Wanyoung, Kim, Dohyung, Yao, Zhen, Kim, Philip, Majumdar, Arunava·2003·Journal of Heat Transfer

Abstract

We have batch-fabricated a microdevice consisting of two adjacent symmetric silicon nitride membranes suspended by long silicon nitride beams for measuring thermophysical properties of one-dimensional nanostructures (nanotubes, nanowires, and nanobelts) bridging the two membranes. A platinum resistance heater/thermometer is fabricated on each membrane. One membrane can be Joule heated to cause heat conduction through the sample to the other membrane. Thermal conductance, electrical conductance, and Seebeck coefficient can be measured using this microdevice in the temperature range of 4–400 K of an evacuated Helium cryostat. Measurement sensitivity, errors, and uncertainty are discussed. Measurement results of a 148 nm and a 10 nm-diameter single wall carbon nanotube bundle are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.1597619

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Osman, M., and Srivastava, D., 2001, “Temperature Dependence of the Thermal Conductivity of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes,” Nanotechnology, 12, pp. 21–24.
  2. Shi, L., 2001, “Mesoscopic Thermophysical Measurements of Microstructures and Carbon Nanotubes,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, L., Li, D., Yu, C., Jang, W., Kim, D., Yao, Z., Kim, P., & Majumdar, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Venue
Journal of Heat Transfer
Published
2003-09-23
Volume
125
Issue
5
Pages
881-888
ISSN
  • 0022-1481 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-8943
OpenAlex
W2040661631
Cited by
733
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 37
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Welch Foundation
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • Basic Energy Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Keywords
thermal conductance, thermoelectric properties, Seebeck coefficient, one-dimensional nanostructures, carbon nanotubes, nanowires, nanobelts, silicon nitride membranes, Joule heating, electrical conductance, cryogenic temperature measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review