Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 185 of the 185 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty

Open access
Secco, L. F., Samuroff, S., Krause, E., Jain, B., Blazek, J., Raveri, M., Campos, A., Amon, A., Chen, A., Doux, C., Choi, A., Gruen, D., Bernstein, G. M., Chang, C., DeRose, J., Myles, J., Ferté, A., Lemos, P., Huterer, D., Prat, J., Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Liddle, A. R., Kacprzak, T., Fang, X., Sánchez, C., Pandey, S., Dodelson, S., Chintalapati, P., Hoffmann, K., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E. J., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Brandao-Souza, A., Camacho, H., Carnero Rosell, A., Carrasco Kind, M., Cawthon, R., Cordero, J. P., Crocce, M., Davis, C., Di Valentino, E., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elidaiana, M., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P.-F., Muir, J., Mccullough, J., Navarro Alsina, A., Omori, Y., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Rollins, R., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E. S., Shin, T., Troja, A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., De Vicente, J., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Lin, H., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Plazas Malagón, A. A., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Romer, A. K., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Scolnic, D., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., DES Collaboration·2022·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.105.023515
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. [Phys. Rev. D 105, 023514 (2022)], present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter ${S}_{8}\ensuremath{\equiv}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}\sqrt{{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}_{\mathrm{m}}/0.3}$ at the 3% level in $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$: ${S}_{8}=0.75{9}_{\ensuremath{-}0.023}^{+0.025}$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angular scale cuts that are optimized for the $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ analysis: ${S}_{8}=0.77{2}_{\ensuremath{-}0.017}^{+0.018}$ (68% CL). With cosmic shear alone, we find no statistically significant constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at our present statistical power. We carry out our analysis blind, and compare our measurement with constraints from two other contemporary weak lensing experiments: the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and Hyper-Suprime Camera Subaru Strategic Program (HSC). We additionally quantify the agreement between our data and external constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Our DES Y3 result under the assumption of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ is found to be in statistical agreement with Planck 2018, although favors a lower ${S}_{8}$ than the CMB-inferred value by $2.3\ensuremath{\sigma}$ (a $p$-value of 0.02). This paper explores the robustness of these cosmic shear results to modeling of intrinsic alignments, the matter power spectrum and baryonic physics. We additionally explore the statistical preference of our data for intrinsic alignment models of different complexity. The fiducial cosmic shear model is tested using synthetic data, and we report no biases greater than $0.3\ensuremath{\sigma}$ in the plane of ${S}_{8}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}_{\mathrm{m}}$ caused by uncertainties in the theoretical models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.105.023515

Cites

185 of 185 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 185 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Secco, L. F., Samuroff, S., Krause, E., Jain, B., Blazek, J., Raveri, M., Campos, A., Amon, A., Chen, A., Doux, C., Choi, A., Gruen, D., Bernstein, G. M., Chang, C., DeRose, J., Myles, J., Ferté, A., Lemos, P., Huterer, D., Prat, J., Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Liddle, A. R., Kacprzak, T., Fang, X., Sánchez, C., Pandey, S., Dodelson, S., Chintalapati, P., Hoffmann, K., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E. J., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Brandao-Souza, A., Camacho, H., Carnero Rosell, A., Carrasco Kind, M., Cawthon, R., Cordero, J. P., Crocce, M., Davis, C., Di Valentino, E., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elidaiana, M., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P.-F., Muir, J., Mccullough, J., Navarro Alsina, A., Omori, Y., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Rollins, R., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E. S., Shin, T., Troja, A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., De Vicente, J., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Lin, H., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Plazas Malagón, A. A., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Romer, A. K., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Scolnic, D., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., & DES Collaboration
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2022-01-13
Volume
105
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.105.023515
OpenAlex
W3166030703
Cited by
384
References
185
FWCI
32.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.105.023515
The paper
Secco, L. F., Samuroff, S., Krause, E., Jain, B., Blazek, J., Raveri, M., Campos, A., Amon, A., Chen, A., Doux, C., Choi, A., Gruen, D., Bernstein, G. M., Chang, C., DeRose, J., Myles, J., Ferté, A., Lemos, P., Huterer, D., . . . DES Collaboration. (2022). Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.105.023515

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.