Cited by 107Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Quantum cosmological singularities

Gotay, Mark J., Demaret, Jacques·1983·Physical Review D

Abstract

The problem of gravitationally induced spacetime collapse is studied in the framework of quantum cosmology. We find that whether quantum collapse occurs is effectively predetermined, on the classical level, by the choice of time. The crucial distinction is between "fast" and "slow" times, that is, between times which give rise to complete or incomplete classical evolution, respectively. We conjecture that unitary slow-time quantum dynamics is always nonsingular, while unitary fast-time quantum dynamics inevitably leads to collapse. These contentions are supported by an analysis of the dust-filled Friedmann-Robertson-Walker universes in two choices of time: a cosmic time defined by the velocity potential for the dust and an intrinsic time linked to the expansion. Indeed, these quantum models avoid the classical singularity in the slow matter-time gauge but collapse in the fast geometric-time gauge. We also investigate the qualitatively different forms---unitary and contractive---that the slow-time quantum evolution may take and explore their implications regarding quantum singularity avoidance. One surprising result is that, contrary to widespread belief, this phenomenon does not depend upon the choice of boundary conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.28.2402

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions solving H|ψ>=0 are not the usual probability amplitudes; they require a Newton-Wigner/Klein-Gordon interpretation.

    “The main consequence of (4.12) is to show that, in contrast to the suggestions of [33,34] the wavefunctions q ⊥ , q, q c |ψ which solve the 'Wheeler-DeWitt equation' q ⊥ , q, q c |H |ψ = 0 do not correspond to the usual probability amplitudes, but must instead be interpreted using constructions like those associated with the Newton-Wigner operators and the Klein-Gordon inner product.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gotay, M. J., & Demaret, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Liège (BE)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1983-11-15
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
2402-2413
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009198547
Cited by
107
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
quantum cosmology, spacetime singularities, wave function collapse, unitarity, time gauge, cosmic time, geometric time, FRW universe, dust cosmology, singularity avoidance, boundary conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review