Cited by 516High-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

High-energy photons from quark-gluon plasma versus hot hadronic gas

Kapusta, Joseph, Lichard, Peter, Seibert, David·1991·Physical Review D

Abstract

Photons in the energy range of about one-half to several GeV have been proposed as a signal of the formation of a quark-gluon plasma in high-energy collisions. To lowest order the thermal emission rate is infrared divergent for massless quarks, but we regulate this divergence using the resummation technique of Braaten and Pisarski. Photons can also be produced in the hadron phase. We find that the dominant contribution comes from the reactions $\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ and $\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\gamma}$; the decays $\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ and $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ are also significant. Comparing the thermal emission rates at a temperature $T=200$ MeV we conclude that the hadron gas shines just as brightly as the quark-gluon plasma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.44.2774

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spinodal instabilities would result in the formation and growth of pion domains with distinct observational signatures in the pion distribution.

    “Spinodal instabilities would result in the formation and growth of pion domains [142] with distinct observational signatures in the pion distribution.”

    From Phase Transitions in the Early and Present Universe (2006) · cites this paper as [142]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapusta, J., Lichard, P., & Seibert, D.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1991-11-01
Volume
44
Issue
9
Pages
2774-2788
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052222991
Cited by
516
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DEFG0287ER40328)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
quark-gluon plasma, high-energy photons, thermal photon emission, hadron gas, infrared divergences, rho meson decay, omega meson decay, pion decay, quark-gluon plasma signatures, heavy-ion collisions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review