The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relation between physical and gravitational geometry
Open accessAbstract
The appearance of two geometries in a single gravitational theory is familiar. Usually, as in the Brans-Dicke theory or in string theory, these are conformally related Riemannian geometries. Is this the most general relation between the two geometries allowed by physics? We study this question by supposing that the physical geometry on which matter dynamics takes place could be Finslerian rather than just Riemannian. An appeal to the weak equivalence principle and causality then leads us to the conclusion that the Finsler geometry has to reduce to a Riemann geometry whose metric, the physical metric, is related to the gravitational metric by a generalization of the conformal transformation involving a scalar field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of Gravitation
Brans, C., & Dicke, R. H. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 · Cited by 5,621
A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis
Milgrom, M. (1983) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/161130 · Cited by 3,316
Does the missing mass problem signal the breakdown of Newtonian gravity?
Bekenstein, J., & Milgrom, M. (1984) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/162570 · Cited by 966
Self-citationMach's Principle and Invariance under Transformation of Units
Dicke, R. H. (1962) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.125.2163 · Cited by 844
Long range forces and broken symmetries
Dirac, P. A. M. (1973) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1973.0070 · Cited by 510
Mass discrepancies in galaxies: dark matter and alternatives
Sanders, R. H. (1990) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/bf00873540 · Cited by 165
Zur Theorie der Gravitation vom Standpunkt des Relativitätsprinzips
Nordström, G. (1913) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19133471303 · Cited by 160
Are particle rest masses variable? Theory and constraints from solar system experiments
Bekenstein, J. D. (1977) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.1458 · Cited by 74
Self-citationConformal invariance, microscopic physics, and the nature of gravitation
Bekenstein, J. D., & Meisels, A. (1980) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.1313 · Cited by 72
Self-citationTHE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN GENERAL RELATIVITY AND EXPERIMENT: A 1992 UPDATE
Will, C. M. (1992) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271892000033 · Cited by 45
Cited by
The fundamental constants and their variation: observational and theoretical status
Uzan, J.-P. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.403 · Cited by 1,162
Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Avgoustidis, A., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., et al. (2018) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0010-3 · Cited by 1,009
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Cosmological tests of modified gravity
Koyama, K. (2016) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046902 · Cited by 713
The effective field theory of dark energy
Gubitosi, G., Piazza, F., & Vernizzi, F. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032 · Cited by 510
Metadata
- Authors
- Bekenstein, J. D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1993-10-15
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3641-3647
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092963173
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.