Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 606

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Study of constrained minimal supersymmetry

Open access
Kane, G. L., Kolda, Chris, Roszkowski, Leszek, Wells, James D.·1994·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.49.6173
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Taking seriously the phenomenological indications for supersymmetry we have made a detailed study of unified minimal SUSY, including many effects at the few percent level in a consistent fashion. We report here a general analysis of what can be studied without choosing a particular gauge group at the unification scale. Firstly, we find that the encouraging SUSY unification results of recent years do survive the challenge of a more complete and accurate analysis. Taking into account effects at the 5-10% level leads to several improvements of previous results and allows us to sharpen our predictions for SUSY in the light of unification. We perform a thorough study of the parameter space and look for patterns to indicate SUSY predictions, so that they do not depend on arbitrary choices of some parameters or untested assumptions. Our results can be viewed as a fully constrained minimal SUSY standard model. The resulting model forms a well-defined basis for comparing the physics potential of different facilities. Very little of the acceptable parameter space has been excluded by CERN LEP or Fermilab so far, but a significant fraction can be covered when these accelerators are upgraded. A number of initial applications to the understanding of the values of ${m}_{h}$ and ${m}_{t}$the SUSY spectrum, detectability of SUSY at LEP II or Fermilab, $B(b\ensuremath{\rightarrow}s\ensuremath{\gamma})$, $\ensuremath{\Gamma}(Z\ensuremath{\rightarrow}b\overline{b})$, dark matter, etc., are included in a separate section that might be of more interest to some readers than the technical aspects of model building. We formulate an approach to extracting SUSY parameters from data when superpartners are detected. For small $tan\ensuremath{\beta}$ or large ${m}_{t}$ both ${m}_{\frac{1}{2}}$ and ${m}_{0}$ are entirely bounded from above at \AA{} 1 TeV without having to use a fine-tuning constraint.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.49.6173

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 606

Metadata

Authors
Kane, G. L., Kolda, C., Roszkowski, L., & Wells, J. D.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
1994-06-01
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
6173-6210
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.49.6173
OpenAlex
W2129819598
Cited by
606
References
66
FWCI
25.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.