Cited by 281Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pair creation of black holes during inflation

Open access
Bousso, Raphael, Hawking, Stephen W.·1996·Physical Review D

Abstract

Black holes came into existence together with the universe through the quantum process of pair creation in the inflationary era. We present the instantons responsible for this process and calculate the pair creation rate from the no boundary proposal for the wave function of the universe. We find that this proposal leads to physically sensible results, which fit in with other descriptions of pair creation, while the tunneling proposal makes unphysical predictions. We then describe how the pair-created black holes evolve during inflation. In the classical solution, they grow with the horizon scale during the slow roll down of the inflaton field; this is shown to correspond to the flux of field energy across the horizon according to the first law of black hole mechanics. When quantum effects are taken into account, however, it is found that most black holes evaporate before the end of inflation. Finally, we consider the pair creation of magnetically charged black holes, which cannot evaporate. In standard Einstein-Maxwell theory we find that their number in the presently observable universe is exponentially small. We speculate how this conclusion may change if dilatonic theories are applied.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.54.6312

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mass per unit area of the brane is equal to the brane tension and is given by T2 = 2Qm/√3.

    “The mass per unit area is equal to the brane tension and is given by [7, 26] T 2 = 2Q m √ 3 .(48)”

    From Transdimensional tunneling in the multiverse (2010) · cites this paper as [26]

    Section 6, “Charged Black Holes” (page unavailable), discusses magnetic charge and black-hole mass, but not branes, brane tension, or mass per unit area. Searches for the stated formula and for brane tension yielded no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For Schwarzschild-de Sitter there is a more natural choice of normalization of the time-translation Killing vector, owed to Bousso and Hawking, resulting in a non-vanishing Nariai temperature.

    “However, for Schwarzschild-de Sitter there is a more natural choice of normalization of the time-translation Killing vector, owed to Bousso and Hawking [140], resulting in a non-vanishing Nariai temperature.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [140]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. A. D. Linde, 1983, Phys. Lett., 129B, 177, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. S. W. Hawking, 1984, Nucl. Phys., B239, 257, 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90093-2 · DOI
  3. A. D. Linde, 1986, Phys. Lett. B, 175, 395, 10.1016/0370-2693(86)90611-8 · DOI · Paper page
  4. A. D. Linde, 1986, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 1, 81, 10.1142/S0217732386000129 · DOI · Paper page
  5. S. W. Hawking, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3382, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3382 · DOI
  6. R. Emparan, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3386, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3386 · DOI
  7. D. M. Eardley, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3390, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3390 · DOI
  8. R. Gregory, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 5598, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5598 · DOI
  9. G. W. Gibbons, 1986, Fields and Geometry 1986
  10. D. Garfinkle, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 958, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.958 · DOI
  11. F. Dowker, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 2909, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2909 · DOI
  12. F. Dowker, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 50, 2662, 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2662 · DOI
  13. S. W. Hawking, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 4302, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4302 · DOI
  14. R. B. Mann, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 2254, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.2254 · DOI · Paper page
  15. S. W. Hawking, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 5865, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5865 · DOI
  16. R. R. Caldwell, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 53, 7103, 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.7103 · DOI
  17. P. Ginsparg, 1983, Nucl. Phys., B222, 245, 10.1016/0550-3213(83)90636-3 · DOI
  18. A. Vilenkin, 1986, Phys. Rev. D, 33, 3560, 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.3560 · DOI · Paper page
  19. A. Vilenkin, 1973, Euclidean Quantum Gravity
  20. R. Bousso, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 5659, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5659 · DOI
  21. G. F. Smoot, 1992, Astrophys. J., 396, L1, 10.1086/186504 · DOI
  22. J. J. Halliwell, 1985, Phys. Rev. D, 31, 1777, 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1777 · DOI · Paper page
  23. A. D. Linde, 1984, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 87, 369
  24. G. W. Gibbons, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 2752, 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752 · DOI · Paper page
  25. F. Mellor, 1989, Class. Quantum Grav., 6, 1379, 10.1088/0264-9381/6/10/008 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bousso, R., & Hawking, S. W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1996-11-15
Volume
54
Issue
10
Pages
6312-6322
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2079512099
Cited by
281
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
black hole pair creation, inflation (cosmology), instantons, no-boundary proposal, wave function of the universe, black hole evaporation, black hole growth, slow-roll inflation, first law of black hole thermodynamics, magnetically charged black holes, Einstein-Maxwell theory, primordial black holes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review