The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Axiomatic approach to electromagnetic and gravitational radiation reaction of particles in curved spacetime
Open accessAbstract
The problem of determining the electromagnetic and gravitational ``self-force'' on a particle in a curved spacetime is investigated using an axiomatic approach. In the electromagnetic case, our key postulate is a ``comparison axiom,'' which states that whenever two particles of the same charge $e$ have the same magnitude of acceleration, the difference in their self-force is given by the ordinary Lorentz force of the difference in their (suitably compared) electromagnetic fields. We thereby derive an expression for the electromagnetic self-force which agrees with that of DeWitt and Brehme as corrected by Hobbs. Despite several important differences, our analysis of the gravitational self-force proceeds in close parallel with the electromagnetic case. In the gravitational case, our final expression for the (reduced order) equations of motion shows that the deviation from geodesic motion arises entirely from a ``tail term,'' in agreement with recent results of Mino et al. Throughout the paper, we take the view that ``point particles'' do not make sense as fundamental objects, but that ``point particle equations of motion'' do make sense as means of encoding information about the motion of an extended body in the limit where not only the size but also the charge and mass of the body go to zero at a suitable rate. Plausibility arguments for the validity of our comparison axiom are given by considering the limiting behavior of the self-force on extended bodies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wald, R. M. (1984) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001 · Cited by 7,188
Self-citationPenrose, R., & Rindler, W. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511564048 · Cited by 2,172
Does back reaction enforce the averaged null energy condition in semiclassical gravity?
Flanagan, E. E., & Wald, R. M. (1996) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.6233 · Cited by 352
Self-citation
Cited by
Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with Gravitational Waves
Sathyaprakash, B. S., & Schutz, B. F. (2009) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2009-2 · Cited by 874
Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
Bern, Z., Cheung, C., Roiban, R., Shen, C.-H., Solon, M. P., & Zeng, M. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.201603 · Cited by 522
Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity
Barack, L., & Pound, A. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aae552 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Quinn, T. C., & Wald, R. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1997-09-15
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3381-3394
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2107449727
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Axiomatic approach to electromagnetic and gravitational radiation reaction of particles in curved spacetime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.56.3381
- The paper
- Quinn, T. C., & Wald, R. M. (1997). Axiomatic approach to electromagnetic and gravitational radiation reaction of particles in curved spacetime. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.56.3381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.