Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Holography and defect conformal field theories

DeWolfe, Oliver, Freedman, Daniel Z., Ooguri, Hirosi·2002·Physical Review D

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.66.025009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One realization of the Karch-Randall construction is a D5-probe brane intersecting a stack of D3 branes, leading to a doubly holographic interpretation.

    “Rather, one realization is that of a D5-probe brane intersecting a stack of D3 branes [16,327], leading to a doubly holographic interpretation (Section 3.1).”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [327]

  • Stringy realizations of the KR construction were uncovered in [16,[326][327][328] (and more recently,[59]).

    “Stringy realizations of the KR construction were uncovered in[16,[326][327][328] (and more recently,[59]).”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [327]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. J. Maldacena, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. O. Aharony, 2000, Phys. Rep., 323, 183, 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083-6 · DOI
  3. J.L. Cardy, 1984, Nucl. Phys., B240, 514, 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90241-4 · DOI
  4. D.M. McAvity, 1995, Nucl. Phys., B455, 522, 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00476-9 · DOI
  5. A. Karch, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 061601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.061601 · DOI · Paper page
  6. A. Karch, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 06, 063, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/06/063 · DOI · Paper page
  7. A. Karch, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 05, 008, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/05/008 · DOI · Paper page
  8. S. Sethi, 1998, Nucl. Phys., B523, 158, 10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00302-2 · DOI
  9. A. Kapustin, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 571, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n3.a6 · DOI
  10. C. Bachas, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 02, 025, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/02/025 · DOI
  11. A. Hanany, 1997, Nucl. Phys., B492, 152, 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00157-0 · DOI
  12. A. Karch, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 12, 016, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/12/016 · DOI
  13. M. Porrati, 1985, Phys. Rev. D, 32, 389, 10.1103/PhysRevD.32.389 · DOI
  14. H.J. Kim, 1985, Phys. Rev. D, 32, 389, 10.1103/PhysRevD.32.389 · DOI
  15. H.J. Boonstra, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 01, 003, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/01/003 · DOI
  16. S.M. Lee, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 697, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n4.a1 · DOI
  17. D.Z. Freedman, 1999, Nucl. Phys., B546, 96, 10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00053-X · DOI
  18. J. Maldacena, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 106006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.106006 · DOI
  19. P. Breitenlohner, 1982, Phys. Lett., 115B, 197, 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90643-8 · DOI · Paper page
  20. P. Breitenlohner, 1982, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 144, 249, 10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. O. DeWolfe, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 064033, 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.064033 · DOI
  22. D.Z. Freedman, 1984, Nucl. Phys., B237, 342, 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90164-0 · DOI
  23. S.J. Gates, 1984, Nucl. Phys., B238, 349, 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90456-5 · DOI
  24. E.A. Mirabelli, 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 58, 065002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.065002 · DOI
  25. P. Horava, 1996, Nucl. Phys., B475, 94, 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00308-2 · DOI · Paper page
  26. H. Georgi, 2001, Phys. Lett. B, 506, 207, 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00408-7 · DOI
  27. W.D. Goldberger, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 025011, 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.025011 · DOI
  28. A.N. Redlich, 1984, Phys. Rev. Lett., 52, 18, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.18 · DOI
  29. A.N. Redlich, 1984, Phys. Rev. D, 29, 2366, 10.1103/PhysRevD.29.2366 · DOI
  30. L. Alvarez-Gaume, 1984, Nucl. Phys., B234, 269, 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90066-X · DOI
  31. D.Z. Freedman, 1992, Nucl. Phys., B371, 353, 10.1016/0550-3213(92)90240-C · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DeWolfe, O., Freedman, D. Z., & Ooguri, H.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2002-07-10
Volume
66
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821
  • 1089-4918
Cited by
265
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review