The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lorentz and CPT violation in neutrinos
Open accessAbstract
A general formalism is presented for violations of Lorentz and CPT symmetry in the neutrino sector. The effective Hamiltonian for neutrino propagation in the presence of Lorentz and CPT violation is derived, and its properties are studied. Possible definitive signals in existing and future neutrino-oscillation experiments are discussed. Among the predictions are direction-dependent effects, including neutrino-antineutrino mixing, sidereal and annual variations, and compass asymmetries. Other consequences of Lorentz and CPT violation involve unconventional energy dependences in oscillation lengths and mixing angles. A variety of simple models both with and without neutrino masses are developed to illustrate key physical effects. The attainable sensitivities to coefficients for Lorentz violation in the Standard-Model Extension are estimated for various types of experiments. Many experiments have potential sensitivity to Planck-suppressed effects, comparable to the best tests in other sectors. The lack of existing experimental constraints, the wide range of available coefficient space, and the variety of novel effects imply that some or perhaps even all of the existing data on neutrino oscillations might be due to Lorentz and CPT violation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CPT violation and the standard model
Colladay, D., & Kostelecký, V. A. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.6760 · Cited by 1,779
Self-citationHigh-energy tests of Lorentz invariance
Coleman, S., & Glashow, S. L. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.116008 · Cited by 1,149
Signals for Lorentz violation in electrodynamics
Kostelecký, V. A., & Mewes, M. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.056005 · Cited by 767
Self-citationConstraints on Lorentz violation from clock-comparison experiments
Kostelecký, V. A., & Lane, C. D. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.116010 · Cited by 378
Self-citationLimit on Lorentz and CPT Violation of the Neutron Using a Two-Species Noble-Gas Maser
Bear, D., Stoner, R. E., Walsworth, R. L., Kostelecký, V. A., & Lane, C. D. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.5038 · Cited by 309
Self-citationJacobson, T., Liberati, S., & Mattingly, D. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.124011 · Cited by 240
CPTand Lorentz Tests with Muons
Bluhm, R., Kostelecký, V. A., & Lane, C. D. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.1098 · Cited by 237
Self-citationSpacetime-varying couplings and Lorentz violation
Kostelecký, V. A., Lehnert, R., & Perry, M. J. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.123511 · Cited by 212
Self-citationLorentz andCPTTests with Spin-Polarized Solids
Bluhm, R., & Kostelecký, V. A. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.1381 · Cited by 201
Self-citationPast Electron-Positrong−2Experiments Yielded Sharpest Bound onCPTViolation for Point Particles
Dehmelt, H., Mittleman, R., Van Dyck, R. S., & Schwinberg, P. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4694 · Cited by 191
Cited by
Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model
Kostelecký, V. A. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.105009 · Cited by 1,368
Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance
Mattingly, D. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-5 · Cited by 1,061
Significant Excess of Electronlike Events in the MiniBooNE Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiment
Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A., Brown, B. C., Bugel, L., Cheng, G., Conrad, J. M., Cooper, R. L., Dharmapalan, R., Diaz, A., Djurcic, Z., Finley, D. A., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.221801 · Cited by 470
Event Excess in the MiniBooNE Search forν¯μ→ν¯eOscillations
Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A., Anderson, C. E., Brice, S. J., Brown, B. C., Bugel, L., Conrad, J. M., Dharmapalan, R., Djurcic, Z., Fleming, B. T., Ford, R., et al. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.181801 · Cited by 447
The Giant Radio Array for Neutrino Detection (GRAND): Science and design
Álvarez-Muñiz, J., Alves Batista, R., Balagopal V., A., Bolmont, J., Bustamante, M., Carvalho, W., Charrier, D., Cognard, I., Decoene, V., Denton, P. B., et al. (2020) · Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-018-9385-7 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Alan Kostelecký, V., & Mewes, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-01-30
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2099998178
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
