CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 309Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Limit on Lorentz and CPT Violation of the Neutron Using a Two-Species Noble-Gas Maser

Open access
Bear, D., Stoner, R. E., Walsworth, R. L., Kostelecký, V. Alan, Lane, Charles D.·2000·Physical Review Letters
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.85.5038
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A search for sidereal variations in the frequency difference between co-located ${}^{129}\mathrm{Xe}$ and ${}^{3}\mathrm{He}$ Zeeman masers sets the most stringent limit to date on leading-order Lorentz and CPT violation involving the neutron, consistent with no effect at the level of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}31}\mathrm{GeV}$.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.85.5038

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The best overall limit is in the neutron sector of the mSME and comes from a 3He/129Xe maser system.

    “The best overall limit is in the neutron sector of the mSME and comes from a 3He/129Xe maser system [44, 45].”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. V. W. Hughes, H. G. Robinson, and V. Beltran-Lopez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 342 (1960).
  2. R. W. P. Drever, Philos. Mag. 6, 683 (1961).
  3. J. D. Prestage et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2387 (1985).
  4. S. K. Lamoreaux et al., Phys. Rev. A 39, 1082 (1989).
  5. T. E. Chupp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1541 (1989).
  6. C. J. Berglund et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1879 (1995);
  7. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997); 58, 116002 (1998).
  8. V. A. Kostelecký and C. D. Lane, Phys. Rev. D 60, 116010 (1999);
  9. J. Math. Phys. 40, 6425 (1999).
  10. V. A. Kostelecký and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 224 (1989);
  11. Phys. Rev. D 40, 1886 (1989);
  12. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1811 (1991).
  13. V. A. Kostelecký and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 39, 683 (1989);
  14. Phys. Lett. B 381, 89 (1996); hep-th /0008252;
  15. V. A. Kostelecký, M. Perry, and R. Potting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4541 (2000).
  16. R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecký, and N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1432 (1997);
  17. Phys. Rev. D 57, 3932 (1998).
  18. R. Bluhm and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1381 (2000).
  19. R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecký, and N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2254 (1999).
  20. S. M. Carroll, G. B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990).
  21. R. Jackiw and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3572 (1999). See also M. Pérez-Victoria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2518 (1999);
  22. J. M. Chung, Phys. Lett. B 461, 138 (1999).
  23. R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecký, and C. D. Lane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1098 (2000).
  24. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Lett. B 344, 259 (1995);
  25. Phys. Rev. D 52, 6224 (1995);
  26. V. A. Kostelecký and R. Van Kooten, Phys. Rev. D 54, 5585 (1996);
  27. V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1818 (1998);
  28. O. Bertolami et al., Phys. Lett. B 395, 178 (1997).
  29. S. Coleman and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D 59, 116008 (1999).
  30. G. Gabrielse et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3198 (1999).
  31. R. K. Mittleman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2116 (1999).
  32. H. G. Dehmelt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4694 (1999).
  33. M. G. Harris, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, 1998.
  34. B. Heckel, in Proceedings of the International Confer- ence on Orbis Scientiae 1999, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (Plenum, New York, 2000).
  35. Y. B. Hsiung, in Proceedings of the KAON 99 Conference, Chicago, 1999 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2000).
  36. OPAL Collaboration, R. Ackerstaff et al., Z. Phys. C 76, 401 (1997);
  37. R. E. Stoner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3971 (1996).
  38. D. Bear et al., Phys. Rev. A 57, 5006 (1998).
  39. T. E. Chupp et al., Phys. Rev. A 38, 3998 (1988).
  40. G. D. Cates et al., Phys. Rev. A 45, 4631 (1992).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Bear, D., Stoner, R. E., Walsworth, R. L., Kostelecký, V. A., & Lane, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
ORCID
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2000-12-11
Volume
85
Issue
24
Pages
5038-5041
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.85.5038
OpenAlex
W2044644075
Cited by
309
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Lorentz violation, CPT violation, neutrons, sidereal variation, frequency difference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review